Big Biking Payoff: Alternative Transportation Could Net Midwest over $8 Billion
Kellyn S. Betts
Kellyn S. Betts has written about environmental contaminants, hazards, and technology for solving environmental problems for publications including EHP and Environmental Science & Technology for more than a dozen years.
Environ Health Perspect 120:a34-a34 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.120-a34b [online 01 January 2012]
A New Year’s resolution to bike rather than drive for short trips could improve both personal health and regional air quality. A team led by researchers from the University of Wisconsin at Madison is the first to quantify these benefits in the United States to show they may have a significant economic payoff [EHP 120(1):68–76; Grabow et al.].
In 2010 another team concluded that the health benefits of biking substantially outweigh the risks posed by accidents and exposure to pollution based on a literature review comparing the use of cars and bikes for trips under 5 miles [EHP 118(8):1109–1116]. The new study expands that concept by combining data on transportation, automotive emissions, and health effects of exposure to air pollution to estimate how switching to biking for round trips under 5 miles could impact both air quality and health care costs. Short trips contribute disproportionately to air pollution because a large fraction of toxic automotive emissions, including 25% of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 19% of the primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5), are generated in the first few miles of travel before pollution control devices have reached their operating temperatures.
The new study focused on 11 urban and suburban Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The model for air-quality improvement assumed that car use for all trips of 5 miles or less round trip from April through October were replaced by an alternative means of transportation such as walking, biking, or mass transit. The model for health benefits assumed that 50% of these short trips were taken by bicycle.
Under these conditions the authors project that annual average urban PM2.5 concentrations would decline by 0.1 µg/m3. Estimating effects of vehicle emissions on ground-level ozone is less straightforward; because VOCs can limit the production of ozone in urban areas, reducing automotive emissions (and thus VOC concentrations) would slightly increase ozone in most cities. But the nonlinear interplay of emissions and meteorology in atmospheric chemistry and transport means reductions in automotive VOCs and nitrogen oxides would still reduce ozone at a regional level.
The models pegged the net health benefit from improved air quality—a benefit that extends beyond city limits—at $4.94 billion per year. The $3.8 billion in estimated annual health benefits that urbanites would accrue from biking were the result of avoided mortality and reduced health care costs through increased physical activity.
Strengths of the study include its cross-disciplinary focus and use of up-to-date models incorporating highly localized emissions and travel data. Although the study acknowledges the health costs associated with car and bike crashes as well as the benefits of increased walking to public transportation, it does not attempt to quantify them.
Related EHP Articles
Come visit with EHP’s Science Editor, Jane Schroeder, at the 2016 ISEE Meeting in Rome, Italy, from 1–4 September 2016. This is a great opportunity to meet a member of our team, and to learn more about the journal. A number of our Associate Editors will be in attendance as well. Jane is also co-hosting a half-day writing and publishing workshop on 4 September, following the conference.
EHP is pleased to present the abstracts from the 28th annual meeting of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE), held in Rome, Italy, 1–4 September 2016, and hosted by the Department of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, and the Italian Epidemiological Association. The focus of this year’s conference is current and future challenges in exposure assessment, study design, and data analyses.
Featured Children’s Health
Birgit Claus Henn, Adrienne S. Ettinger, Marianne R. Hopkins, Rebecca Jim, Chitra Amarasiriwardena, David C. Christiani, Brent A. Coull, David C. Bellinger, and Robert O. Wright
Diane Gilbert-Diamond, Jennifer A. Emond, Emily R. Baker, Susan A. Korrick, and Margaret R. Karagas
Benjamin B. Green, Margaret R. Karagas, Tracy Punshon, Brian P. Jackson, David J. Robbins, E. Andres Houseman, and Carmen J. Marsit