Quantcast
Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
EHP Science Education Website

EHP on Twitter

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 110, Number 1, January 2002 Open Access
spacer
The Effect of Interior Lead Hazard Controls on Children's Blood Lead Concentrations: A Systematic Evaluation

Erin Haynes,1,2 Bruce P. Lanphear,2 Ellen Tohn,3 Nick Farr,4 and George G. Rhoads5

1University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; 2Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; 3ERT Associates, Wayland, Massachusetts, USA; 4The National Center for Lead-Safe Housing, Columbia, Maryland, USA; 5The Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey School of Public Health Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Dust control is often recommended to prevent children's exposure to residential lead hazards, but the effect of these controls on children's blood lead concentrations is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials of low-cost, lead hazard control interventions to determine the effect of lead hazard control on children's blood lead concentration. Four trials met the inclusion criteria. We examined mean blood lead concentration and elevated blood lead concentrations (greater than or equal to 10 µg/dL, greater than or equal to 15 µg/dL, and greater than or equal to 20 µg/dL) and found no significant differences in mean change in blood lead concentration for children by random group assignment (children assigned to the intervention group compared with those assigned to the control group) . We found no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the percentage of children with blood lead greater than or equal to 10 µg/dL, 29% versus 32% [odds ratio (OR) , 0.85 ; 95% confidence interval (CI) , 0.56-1.3], but there was a significant difference in the percentage of children with blood lead greater than or equal to 15 µg/dL between the intervention and control groups, 6% versus 14% (OR, 0.40 ; 95% CI, 0.21-0.80) and in the percentage of children with blood lead greater than or equal to 20 µg/dL between the intervention and control groups, 2% versus 6% (OR, 0.29 ; 95% CI, 0.10-0.85) . We conclude that although low-cost, interior lead hazard control was associated with 50% or greater reduction in the proportion of children who had blood lead concentrations exceeding 15 µg/dL and greater than or equal to 20 µg/dL, there was no substantial effect on mean blood lead concentration. Key words: , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 110:103-107 (2002) . [Online 19 December 2001]

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/110p103-107haynes/ abstract.html

Address correspondence to B.P. Lanphear, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039 USA. Telephone: (513) 636-3778. Fax: (513) 636-4402. E-mail: bruce.lanphear@chmcc.org

We acknowledge the contributions of S. Hilts, A. Aschengrau, and D. Copenhafer. W. Galke and J. Wilson reviewed the manuscript and provided comments.

This study was funded by the National Center for Lead-Safe Housing and the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation.

Received 27 March 2001 ; accepted 1 June 2001.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access USA.gov

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files located on this site.