[ Citation in PubMed ] [ Related Articles ]
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2
Rayne Laboratory, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Key words : asbestos, fiber, MMVF, RCF, free radicals, oxidative stress, glutathione, transcription factors
This paper is based on a presentation at The Sixth International Meeting on the Toxicology of Natural and Man-Made Fibrous and Non-Fibrous Particles held 15-18 September 1996 in Lake Placid, New York. Manuscript received at EHP 27 March 1997; accepted 11July 1997.We acknowledge the help of W. Nicholson in this study and the Health and Savety Executive for their support of DMB.
Address correspondence to Dr. P.S. Gilmour, Applied Chemical and Physical Sciences, Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK. Telephone: 0131 455 2505. Fax: 0131 455 2290. E-mail: p.gilmour@napier.ac.uk
Abbreviations used: AP-1, activator protein 1; BSO, buthionine sulfoximine; CME, cysteine methyl ester; DSF-B, desferrioxamine-B; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; LFA, long-fiber amosite; LPS, lipopolysacharride; Man, mannitol; MMVF, man-made vitreous fiber(s); NF
B, nuclear factor
B; RCC, Research and Consulting Company; RCF, refractory ceramic fiber(s); TIMA, Thermal Insulation Manufacturers' Association.
In the present study we examine the free radical activity of three fibers and relate this to the release of iron and its ability to cause oxidative stress and to activate nuclear transcription factors AP-1 and NF
B in alveolar macrophages.
Measurement of Iron Release from Fibers
All fiber types were suspended in either pH 4.6 or pH 7.2 citric acid/NaHPO
4
buffer at a fiber concentration of 8.24
10
7
fibers/ml and iron release over 8 hr at 37°C was assessed using desferrioxamine-B (DSF-B) for Fe
2+
, or ferrozine 10 mM for Fe
3+
(
8
). The amount of iron present in solution after 8 hr of incubation was expressed as µM Fe
2+
or Fe
3+
/8.24
10
7
fibers.
Measurement of Induction of Fiber-mediated Free Radical
Damage to DNA
As described in detail by Gilmour et al. (
8
),
X174 RF1 closed-circular supercoiled DNA was used to detect free radical activity.
Alveolar Macrophage Preparation
Alveolar macrophages were obtained by lavage from in-house-bred, adult Wistar rats, as described previously. Macrophages were seeded into 24-well plates at a concentration of 1
10
6
cells/ml and allowed to attach for 1 hr, after which nonadherent cells were removed by washing with medium and cell treatments were performed in the culture medium for 4 hr. For gel mobility shift assays 3
10
6
rat alveolar macrophages were seeded and incubated with treatment for 16 hr.
GSH and GSSG Assays
The alveolar macrophages were assessed for GSH and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) by spectrophotometry according to the modified method of Tietze (
11,12
). The protein content of the cell lysates was measured by the BioRad Bradford protein reagent BioRad Laboratories (Hemel, Hempstead, UK) to allow the GSH and GSSG to be described as nanomolar per milligram of protein. To alter the levels of GSH, cysteine methyl ester (CME) was incubated with macrophages for 30 min before fiber addition at a concentration of 300 µM to increase the GSH levels. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) was used similarly to decrease the GSH at a concentration of 100 µM.
Gel Mobility Shift Assays
Nuclear proteins were extracted from treated, washed macrophages, and all gel mobility shift assays were carried out according to the method modified by Nicholson et al. (
13
). Briefly, alveolar macrophages were treated with fibers for 4 hr, after which nuclear proteins were extracted as previously described (
14
). For each mobility shift reaction, 7 µg of nuclear protein was incubated with 1.75 pmol of freshly
32
P-labeled AP-1 or NF
B oligonucleotide. This was carried out at room temperature in the presence of 0.25 mg/ml poly(dI-dC)
poly(dI-dC) competitor oligonucleotides to prevent nonspecific nuclear protein-DNA binding. Samples were separated in 6% polyacrylamide gel for 18 hr at 20 V. Bands were quantified using scanning laser densitometry.
Statistical Analysis
One- or two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the significance of treatment effects. The Tukey correction was used when comparisons between multiple treatment groups were required.
Figure 1 . ( A ) Diagram of the supercoiled DNA plasmid electrophoresis gel indicating the free radical depletion of the supercoiled fraction into relaxed coil and linear plasmid forms. ( B ) Quantification of supercoiled DNA depletion by fiber treatments, demonstrating the role of hydroxyl radical and iron in radical damage to plasmid DNA. This figure and all subsequent figures are the mean and SEM of at least three separate experiments. Man, mannitol.
Release of Iron from Fibers
To assess a possible connection between free radical activity and fiber-associated iron and the effect of physiologically important pHs, the release of iron from a range of fibers was determined. More Fe
3+
than Fe
2+
was released at both pH 4.6 and 7.2; there clearly was more iron released at pH 4.6 than at 7.2 (Figure 2). There did not appear to be any correlation between iron release and free radical activity because both RCF1 and MMVF10 released substantial amounts of iron, with RCF1 releasing significantly more iron of both forms than long-fiber amosite (LFA) (Figure 2).
|
|
Figure 2 . Release of ( A ) Fe 2+ and ( B ) Fe 3+ at pH 4.6 and 7.2 from fibers, demonstrating the increased release of Fe 3+ compared to Fe 2+ and greater release at pH 4.6. |
Rat Alveolar Glutathione Concentration
All fibers significantly lowered intracellular GSH (
p
0.01), with MMVF10 causing the greatest depletion (Figure 3). Chelation of fiber-associated iron did not significantly ameliorate the fiber-mediated decrease in GSH levels, except in the case of LFA treatment, indicating that iron was not responsible for the intracellular redox status (Figure 4).
Figure 3 . Levels of intracellular GSH and GSSG after treatment with different fibers.
Figure 4 . Levels of GSH and GSSG after treatment with normal fibers and fibers treated with the iron chelator DSF. Note no significant effect of chelation of fiber-associated iron.
Transcription Factors
Compared to that in the untreated control, MMVF10 and RCF1 fiber samples upregulated the nuclear translocation of AP-1 transcription factor by 11.9 and 9.1% respectively. LFA, however, produced a far greater increase in AP-1, 37.4% more than in the untreated control. This was similar to the levels found with the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) positive control sample (Figure 5). Only LFA was able to upregulate the NF
B transcription factor; MMVF10 and RCF1 produced no effect (Figure 5).
Figure 5 . Nuclear translocation of ( A ) AP-1 and ( B ) NFB transcription factors with fiber treatments and control. Graph shows quantification of bands; each bar represents the mean and ±SEM values from three separate experiments.
To test the effect of lowering intracellular GSH on the fiber-mediated NF
B activation, fibers were incubated with GSH-depleted cells and NF
B activation was measured. Depletion of GSH increased the upregulation attributed to LFA treatment and also produced upregulation of RCF1 almost double that of the BSO alone control (Figure 6).
Figure 6 . (A) Nuclear translocation of NFB on fiber treatment for control cells and cells pretreated with BSO; LPS treatment as + control. (B) Nuclear translocation of NF
B on fiber treatment for control cells and cells pretreated with CME; LPS treatment as + control. Each bar represents the mean and ± SEM values from three separate experiments. Graph shows quantification of nuclear translocation of NF
B shown in the autoradiographs.
To further study the role of GSH in transcriptional activation, we supplemented the intracellular GSH with CME. In cells pretreated this way LFA-mediated NF
B nuclear translocation was almost eliminated.
The extent of release of the two forms of iron from the fibers at both pHs did not relate to the extent of fiber free radical activity. Although iron was responsible for the activity of asbestos, as demonstrated by chelation studies, both MMV10 and RFC1 released comparable amounts of, if not more, iron. Therefore, the ability of fibers to generate free radicals cannot be accounted for by released iron alone. The importance of iron in free radical activity, however, may lie in the behavior of surface-bound iron; this is under further investigation. The presence in the lung milieu of reductants initiating Fenton chemistry could be a factor in the pathogenicity of man-made fibers that release iron, but obviously this is unimportant in the DNA assay. Phagocytosis by macrophages produces reductants that have been shown to enhance the production of dust-related free radicals ( 18 ) and all three fibers used in the present study caused significant depletions of macrophage GSH. The ability to cause GSH depletion is not, therefore, related to the free radical activities of the fibers. Thus, the products of phagocytosis are likely to mediate some of the oxidative stress effects of fibers. Iron chelation at the fiber surface did not affect the ability of fibers to change GSH redox status, which indicates that GS depletion depends on the presence of iron. The decrease in GSH is likely to be a result of the exportation of GSH as a stress response instead of a direct fiber/free radical oxidation of GSH, which would have resulted in an increase in GSSG. However, the low pH of macrophage phagolysosomes may cause the release of chelated iron and therefore re-expose unchelated iron to the macrophage.
It is suggested that the pathogenicity of asbestos involves fiber-mediated initiation of gene expression (
19
). The upregulation of NF
B and AP-1 transcription factors by LFA, but not significantly by MMVF10 and RCF1, indicates a relationship between fiber free radical activity and gene expression. However, although GSH depletion may play a role in the activation of these transcription factors in other situations (
20
), all three fibers caused depletion of GSH. Pharmacological depletion of GSH with BSO alone did increase upregulation of NF
B and enhanced RCF1-mediated upregulation, so redox status is important in the activation of transcription, as previously shown (
19
). Supplementing intracellular GSH with CME inhibited the LFA-mediated NF
B activation, again confirming that GSH status is important. The fact that all fibers lowered GSH but only LFA caused transcriptional activation, conflicts with the evidence that pharmacologic modulation of GSH did influence transcriptional activation; this may be explained at several levels. The time course of GSH depletion may be central to the activating effect and the 4-hr time point used here may not reflect the most important GSH change. The effect of direct fiber reactivity with cellular thiols may be important in this system in which the thiol redox status of the cell is important in thiol-dependent transcription factor activation. In addition to the effect of fibers on anti-oxidant thiols, there is the possibility that transcription factor-related thiols may be directly influenced by the fibers, masking the relative activation potentials of the fiber samples. These possibilities require further study to determine the mechanism of the activation cascade and to differentiate how the different properties of these fibers result in differing cell responses. Also involved may be other oxidative stress-sensitive molecules such as carbon-based free radical and other intracellular signaling pathways. These are under further investigation.
In conclusion, the hydroxyl radical activity of asbestos exceeds that of MMVF10 and RCF1 fibers and iron does not appear to be a determining factor in this free radical-generating potential or in their relative pathogenicity. The greater free radical activity of LFA was mirrored in the activation of NF
B and AP-1 transcription factors. All three fibers depleted GSH at the 4-hr time point used here. These results indicate that the free radical activity of asbestos and other fibers may be a key factor in to gene transcription in macrophages, but the exact role of GSH in these events remains to be elucidated.
1. Mossman BT, Gee JBL. Medical progress: asbestos-related diseases. N Engl J Med 320:1721-1730 (1989).
2. Donaldson K, Brown RC, Brown GM. Respirable industrial fibers: mechanisms of pathogenicity. Thorax 48:390-395 (1993).
3. Hesterberg TW, Barrett JC. Dependence of asbestos and mineral dust-induced transformation of mammalian cells in culture on fiber dimension. Cancer Res 44:2170-2180 (1984).
4. Palekar LD, Spooner CM, Coffin DL. Influence of crystalline habit of minerals on
in vitro
cytotoxicity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 330:673-678 (1979).
5. Hesterberg TW, Barrett JC. Induction by asbestos fibers of anaphase abnormalities: mechanism for aneuploidy induction and possibly carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 6:473-475 (1985).
6. Bunn WB, Bender JR, Hesterberg TW, Chase GR, Konzen JL. Recent studies of man-made vitreous fibers. J Occup Med 35:101-113 (1994).
7. Kamp DW, Graceffa P, Pryor AW, Weitzman SA. The role of free radicals in asbestos-induced lung disease. Free Radic Biol Med 12:293-315 (1992).
8. Gilmour PS, Beswick PH, Donaldson K. Detection of surface free radical activity of respirable industrial fibers using jX174 RF1 Plasmid DNA. Carcinogenesis 16:2973-2979 (1995).
9. Donaldson K, Beswick PH, Gilmour PS. Free radical activity with the surface of particles: a unifying factor in determining biological activity? Toxicol Lett 88:293-298 (1996).
10. Davis JMG, Addison J, Bolton RE, Donaldson K, Jones AD, Smith T. The pathogenicity of long and short fiber samples of amosite asbestos administered to rats by inhalation and intra-peritoneal injection. Br J Exp Path 67:415-430 (1986).
11. Tietze F. Enzymatic method for quantitative determination of nanogram amounts of total and oxidised glutathione: applications to mammalian blood and other tissue. Anal Biochem 27:502-522 (1969).
12. Roberts JC, Francetic DJ. The importance of sample preparation and storage in glutathione analysis. Anal Biochem 183:16-20 (1989).
13. Nicholson WJ, Slight J, Donaldson K. Inhibition of the transcription factors NF-
14. Hassanain H, Dei W, Gupta SL. Enhanced gel mobility shift assay for DNA-binding factors. Anal Biochem 213:162-167 (1993).
15. Lund LG, Williams MG, Dodson RF, Aust AE. Iron associated with asbestos bodies is responsible for the formation of single strand breaks in jX174 RFI DNA. Occup Environ Med 51:200-204 (1994).
16. Johnston NF, Maples KR. Fiber-induced hydroxyl radical formation and DNA damage. In: Cellular and Molecular Effects of Mineral and Synthetic Dusts and Fibers (Davis JMG, Jaurand MC, eds). Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1994;23-37.
17. Vallyathan V. Oxygen radical generation by asbestos and its correlation to toxicity. In: Davis JMG and Jaurand MC (eds.), Cellular and Molecular Effects of Mineral and Synthetic Dusts and Fibers (Davis JMG, Jaurand MC, eds). Berlin:Springer-Verlag; 1994;9-21.
18. Vallyathan V, Mega JF, Shi X, Dalal NS. Enhanced generation of free radicals from phagocytes induced by mineral dusts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 6:404-413 (1992).
19. Janssen YMW, Heintz NH, Mossman BT. Induction of c-
fos
and c-
jun
proto-oncogene expression by asbestos is ameliorated by
N
-acetyl-l-cysteine in mesothelial cells. Cancer Res 55:2085-2089 (1995).
20. Sen CK, Packer L. Antioxidant and redox regulation of gene transcription. FASEB J 10:709-720 (1996).
B and AP-1 underlies loss of cytokine gene expression in rat alveolar macrophages treated with a diffusible product from the spores of
Aspergillus fumigatus
. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 15:88-96 (1996).
Last Update: November 21, 1997