The world’s most dangerous animal weighs about two milligrams
and pursues its human prey at speeds of barely a mile per
hour. Surprised? Don’t be. The dubious honor belongs to the lowly mosquito--a
fragile creature whose bite infects millions with lethal
diseases, such as malaria, dengue, and West Nile encephalitis. For centuries,
humans have slathered on insect repellents to deter the
buzzing menace--the
first recorded repellents were documented by Herodotus
around 400 B.C. But these products have always been far from optimal. Even DEET
(
N,N´-diethyl-
n-toluamide),
the world’s most popular and efficacious repellent, has numerous
shortcomings: it can require frequent applications, it
must be applied to all exposed body parts, and it won’t protect against
some dangerous mosquito species, including
Anopheles albimanus,
the chief malaria vector in Central America.
 |
Tuned in to scents. Mosquitoes “smell” with
their antennae.
image: Dennis Kunkel Microscopy |
Today, the need for more effective repellents is increasingly urgent,
experts say. According to the World Health Organization, global climate
change is expanding mosquitoes’ range, heightening the risk of
disease for millions of additional people. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention notes that dengue and West Nile virus are both
moving from developing countries towards the United States, where concerns
over mosquito exposure are rising. Malaria--which by various estimates
kills between 1 million and 3 million people worldwide each year--is
also a growing problem in many regions. This is in part because Plasmodium,
the mosquito-borne parasite that causes malaria, is fast becoming resistant
to existing treatments, such as chloroquine.
Many experts believe that better repellents could help to control
mosquito-borne diseases. These next-generation repellents must be effective
against anopheline mosquitoes that carry malaria. They should also
be cheap and nontoxic, and should last long enough to protect humans
as they sleep, when they are most vulnerable.
Where will these repellents come from? The answers, scientists increasingly
say, will be found in genomic research. According to this view, knowledge
of the genes and proteins that mosquitoes rely on to sense their environment
could lead to new repellents that directly interfere with the insects’ ability
to detect human beings.
A Sense of the Future
Today, genomic information about mosquitoes is accruing rapidly.
Scientists with the International Anopheles Genome Project,
a consortium based at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, have already
decoded the genome of An. gambiae, the dominant malaria vector
in Africa. Another genome, for Aedes aegypti, a vector for both
yellow fever and dengue, is now being sequenced with funding from the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Using these
data sets, scientists are identifying the genes that control mosquito
sensory systems, including the olfactory system.
Mosquitoes rely on smell to guide them towards mates, food, and of
course, sources of blood meals. The process is highly specific. For
example, only female mosquitoes are attracted to blood sources, which
they require as nourishment for their eggs. (Mosquitoes’ main
nutriment comes from other sources, mainly plant nectar.) Olfaction
is also species-specific. An. gambiae, for instance, prefers
to bite humans. “You could be in a room full of cows, and that
mosquito will find you and bite you,” says Laurence Zwiebel,
an associate professor of biology at Vanderbilt University. Because
this species has evolved to target humans, it will stay indoors where
it can get to them more easily, he adds.
 |
 |
Reception conservation. Leslie Vosshall and colleagues
(left) developed a fruit fly strain lacking the Or83b gene. The
mutation means the fruit flies’ odorant receptors (above,
stained red) are not properly localized in the sensory hairs, and
the flies do not respond when exposed to banana odor. When GPRor7,
the mosquito equivalent of Or83b, is put into the mutant fruit
flies, the odorant receptors return to the sensory hairs, and the
flies now respond to banana odor.
images: left: Walton Jones/Rockefeller University; micrographs: Leslie
Vosshall |
To better understand the molecular biology of mosquito olfaction,
consider the following scenario: You’re asleep in the summertime,
in a warm room with an open window. Your body and the bacteria that
reside on your skin are giving off a molecular cloud of human-specific
odorants. These molecules drift through the air and soon reach a mosquito
perched on the wall. In an instant, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs)
located on the creature’s antennae bind the molecules and transport
them towards receptors located on the surfaces of the olfactory neurons.
The odorant-receptor linkage activates a cue in the mosquito’s
nervous system, which alerts the insect to your presence. Moments later,
the mosquito lands on your unprotected shoulder and begins to feed.
OBPs are now widely viewed as one of the most likely targets for
next-generation repellents. Compounds that interfere with these proteins
could block mosquitoes’ ability to smell and thus detect humans. “This
really is a unique approach,” says Leslie Vosshall, head of the
Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior at Rockefeller University. “Since
we now know quite a bit about the basic workings of insect olfactory
systems, we can focus our search for new repellents that interrupt
proteins known to be important for smell. We’re optimistic that
this rational approach to repellent design will uncover new compounds
that are safer and more effective than those that are currently available.”
Targeting Olfactory Proteins
Vosshall has found that the function of a wide range of odorant receptors
in insects depends on a single type of protein “coreceptor” that
facilitates the binding of the OBP-odorant complex to the receptor.
Working with fruit flies, she has shown that mutations in this protein,
which in fruit flies is called Or83b, knocks out the insect’s
sense of smell altogether. The protein, she says, is highly conserved
across many different species; in mosquitoes, it now goes by the name
GPRor7 (until recently, it was known as AgOR7). In recent studies,
Vosshall generated a strain of fruit flies that lacked the Or83b gene
and hence the ability to smell. This finding, remarkable in its own
right, was rendered even more so by a subsequent discovery: when she
replaced the missing Or83b gene with the GPRor7 gene
obtained from mosquitoes, the fruit flies’ olfactory system was
restored to a normal state. This means GPRor7 substituted for Or83b,
even though mosquitoes and fruit flies diverged more than 250 million
years ago.
Based on these findings, Vosshall suggests that GPRor7 is a plausible
target for a mosquito repellent. Knock out this protein, she says,
and a mosquito will be unable to smell anything--humans included. Her
findings are published in the 22 February 2005 issue of Current
Biology.
 |
The hair of the mosquito that bit you? The antenna
of the female Anopheles mosquito (above right and inset) bristles
with various olfactory sensillae used for prey detection, flight
direction, and egg laying. Laurence Zwiebel (above left, with mosquitoes)
is targeting human-specific olfactory receptors in these mosquitoes.
images: left: Neil Brake/Vanderbilt Unviversity; right and inset:
Laurence Zwiebel |
Zwiebel and his colleagues are taking a different tack. Instead of
targeting a single protein that regulates mosquitoes’ entire
sense of smell, he’s homing in on the olfactory proteins that
bind human odorants only. In the 15 January 2004 issue of Nature,
Zwiebel published results showing that one olfactory receptor in An.
gambiae--a protein known as Or1--preferentially binds 4-methylphenol,
one of roughly 300 compounds found in human sweat. Moreover, the Or1
receptor was found only in female mosquitoes--further evidence of the
intricate specificity in the insect’s olfactory machinery.
Today, Zwiebel and his colleagues are striving to identify other
human-specific odorants with the goal of creating repellents that inactivate
groups of these targets simultaneously. This approach lessens the likelihood
that mosquitoes will develop resistance to the repellents, he says. “It’s
almost impossible for resistance mutations to appear in four to five
receptors concurrently, and they would not make their way into the
mosquito population,” he explains. “What we really want
is a toolbox of behaviorally disruptive olfactory compounds,” he
adds. “This would allow us to fine-tune repellent blends for
specific geographic regions, where mosquito populations and olfactory
mechanisms might vary.”
The future repellents mark an additional departure because they could
be incorporated into time-release systems that put active ingredients
into the air. Thus, there would be no need to apply the repellents
to the body; instead, they would protect a living space in its entirety.
This is important for those mosquitoes--An. gambiae in
particular--that prefer indoor environments and sleeping humans.
Scratching the Surface
Experts agree that no new repellent will necessarily be a panacea
for mosquito control. Andrew Spielman, a professor of tropical public
health at the Harvard University School of Public Health and author
of the book Mosquito: A Natural History of Our Most Persistent and
Deadly Foe, suggests that all repellents pose a fundamental dilemma:
mosquitoes deterred from one protected person will simply flock in
greater numbers to another who is unprotected. “What drives the
force of disease transmission is the biting rate,” he explains. “If
half the people are being bitten by all the mosquitoes, then those
people and any mosquitoes that feed on them will wind up being terrifically
infected.” But Spielman acknowledges that repellents can be very
useful--“I’m just not sure about who specifically is going
to benefit from them,” he says.
When posed with this question, Zwiebel responds that health officials
must take steps to ensure that no one is left unprotected. “That’s
a challenge we need to accept,” he says. “We need to make
sure these products are universally available and economically affordable.”
In the end, new repellents will be just part of a broader strategy
to control mosquitoes, a strategy that Spielman says must also incorporate
better environmental management, housing improvements, and greater
use of insecticide-treated bed nets. Meanwhile, it’s hard to
say which type of rationally designed repellent is likely to emerge
first. Will it target one protein, as Vosshall suggests it could, or
will it target several, as Zwiebel says it must? “At the end
of the day,” Zwiebel says, “everyone is going forward with
the best of intentions, and we just have to see what comes out.”
Charles W. Schmidt