Is Pesticide Use Related to Parkinson Disease? Some Clues to Heterogeneity in Study Results
1 Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands, 2 St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands, 3 Julius Centre for Public Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Environ Health Perspect 120:340-347 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103881 [online 21 October 2011]
Background: Previous systematic reviews have indicated that pesticide exposure is possibly associated with Parkinson disease (PD). However, considerable heterogeneity has been observed in study results.
Objective: We aimed at providing an update of the literature published on PD and exposure to pesticides by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. In addition, we investigated whether methodological differences between studies could explain the heterogeneity in study results.
Methods: We identified studies through a systematic literature search. We calculated summary risk ratios (sRRs) for pesticide exposure and subcategories using random effects meta-analyses and investigated sources of heterogeneity by meta-regression and stratified analyses.
Results: Thirty-nine case–control studies, four cohort studies, and three cross-sectional studies were identified. An sRR of 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40, 1.88] for pesticide exposure (ever vs. never) was found. Summary estimates for subclasses of pesticides indicated a positive association with herbicides and insecticides, but not with fungicides. Heterogeneity in individual study results was not related to study design, source of control population, adjustment of results for potential confounders, or geographical area. However, results were suggestive for heterogeneity related to differences in the exposure assessment. Job title–based exposure assignment resulted in a higher sRR (2.5; 95% CI: 1.5, 4.1) than did assignment based on self-reported exposure (e.g., for self-reported ever/never exposure, sRR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 1.8).
Conclusions: This review affirms the evidence that exposure to herbicides and insecticides increase the risk of PD. Future studies should focus on more objective and improved methods of pesticide exposure assessment.
Key words: exposure assessment, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, meta-analysis, Parkinson disease, pesticides, systematic review
Address correspondence to M. van der Mark, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Jenalaan 18d, 3584 CK, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Telephone: 31302537236. Fax: 31302539499. E-mail: M.vanderMark@uu.nl
This work was supported by the Internationaal Parkinson Fonds (the Netherlands).
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Received 02 May 2011; accepted 21 October 2011; online 21 October 2011.
* These authors are co-senior authors for this work.
Parkinson disease (PD) is an idiopathic degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that impairs motor skills, cognitive processes, and other functions. The etiology of PD is largely unknown, although some genetic factors have been identified (Bekris et al. 2010; Shulman et al. 2011). Based on published epidemiological and toxicological studies, pesticides may be involved in the etiology of PD (Brown et al. 2006). However, epidemiological evidence is far from conclusive, as considerable heterogeneity has been observed in study results (Brown et al. 2006; Li et al. 2005; Priyadarshi et al. 2000). Possible methodological causes of heterogeneity in study results have been suggested and include differences in study design, control selection, diagnosis of patients, and statistical analysis (Brown et al. 2006). Differences in exposure assessment methods could contribute to heterogeneity as well. Most previous studies relied almost exclusively on self-reported exposures, a process that is prone to recall bias, especially in case–control studies, and could lead to false-positive associations. Alternatively, one could speculate that PD patients might underreport pesticide exposure because of cognitive deficits, leading to false-negative associations. Furthermore, differences in the definition of exposure to pesticides (occupational vs. nonoccupational use, ever/never vs. regular use) could also result in heterogeneous study results. Lastly, the regions where the studies have been conducted could be of importance as regulation, types, and use of pesticides may differ from region to region.
Several recent studies have been published on pesticide exposure and PD risk, including some prospective (cohort) studies. In the present analysis, we aimed at providing an update of the literature published since the last systematic review on PD (Brown et al. 2006) and exposure to pesticides and pesticide subcategories by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. We specifically set out to address the question of whether the previously described heterogeneity in study findings could be explained by differences in study design and exposure assessment methods.
Data source. We searched the databases Embase (http://www.Embase.com/), starting with 1974, and Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), starting with 1950, through November 2010 using the search term “Parkinson” in combination with “pesticide*,” “insecticide*,” “fungicide*,” “herbicide*,” “rodenticide*,” “organochlorine*,” “organophosphate*,” “carbamate*,” “glyphosate*,” “paraquat,” “maneb,” “lindane,” “dieldrin,” “rotenone,” “DDT,” or “environmental factors.” The search was limited to publications in English, French, German, or Dutch; to human studies; and to original publications. We also searched the reference lists of the retrieved publications.
Study selection. We included studies that specifically investigated PD or parkinsonism. We included cohort studies, case–control studies, and cross-sectional studies. No reviews, case reports, or conference abstracts were included. We excluded studies that summarized results of pesticide exposure only within a broad category of “chemical exposure.” Exposure to pesticides was defined as use of pesticides by the subject, thus excluding environmental studies.
Data extraction. Two reviewers (M.M., M.B.) independently extracted reported risk estimates [i.e., odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios (RRs), or prevalence ratios], study designs, exposure assessment methods, and types of source population for the controls. We also evaluated subcategories of pesticides and extracted data about exposure–response relations and individual pesticides. Two other researchers (A.H., R.V.) acted as referees in cases of any differences. If authors reported adjustment for potential confounders, we preferred adjusted risk estimates over crude risk estimates. In cases where no risk estimate or 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported, we calculated crude risk estimates and 95% CIs with the reported numbers. Where risk estimates were reported separately for men and women, we pooled the risk estimates with a within-study meta-analysis (Vlaanderen et al. 2011). Of studies with more than one control group, the results of population controls were preferred above the results of hospital controls because population controls are generally considered to be a more representative comparison group than hospital controls.
Statistical analysis. Because of the observed heterogeneity in study results, we conducted a DerSimonian and Laird (1986) random effects meta-analysis to pool the results of the separate studies for risk for pesticide exposure and the subgroups of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. We also stratified by whether or not nonoccupational exposure (e.g., gardening) was included in the exposed group. This was because of potential differences between occupational and nonoccupational exposures in intensity and frequency of exposures. In one publication, results both for occupational and for occupational and/or nonoccupational exposure were reported (Frigerio et al. 2006). We chose to include risk estimates of the more inclusive exposure definition, although final results did not differ when we included the risk estimates based on only occupational exposure (data not shown).
Subsequently, we explored whether heterogeneity in observed risk estimates could be explained by study and exposure assessment characteristics. We did so by stratification and used meta-regression to explore statistical significance of these characteristics. Given the limited number of studies, we only explored one characteristic at a time. Characteristics explored were the type of exposure assessment (self-reported ever/never pesticide exposure, self-reported regular pesticide exposure, or exposure assessment based on reported job titles by expert judgment and/or applying a job-exposure matrix), source of control population [hospital, general population, or other (studies using family members or case acquaintances as controls, or studies that used a combination of different sources)], geographical area (North America, Europe, or other), and whether adjustments were made for potential confounders. The I2 measure was used to quantify the heterogeneity between studies; I2 can be interpreted as a measure of the percentage of the total variation that cannot be explained by chance (Higgins et al. 2003). p-Values for heterogeneity are based on the Q-statistic. Small study effects were tested with funnel plots and Egger’s test (Egger et al. 1997). All analyses were performed with Stata (version 10; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) with the metan, metareg, metafunnel, and metabias commands. All statistical tests were two sided, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The search in Embase and Medline yielded 883 publications, of which 52 publications met the inclusion criteria. We excluded 3 publications (Fong et al. 2005; Menegon et al. 1998; Smargiassi et al. 1998) where the study population had been included in subsequent publications (De Palma et al. 1998; Fong et al. 2007; McCann et al. 1998). Lastly, one study (Taylor et al. 1999) was excluded because the reported data showed risk per year of pesticide exposure, which was not comparable with reported risk ratios of other studies. Among the remaining 48 publications, there were two studies for which the relevant results were reported in two separate publications each (Firestone et al. 2005, 2010; Semchuk et al. 1992, 1993). Thus, results of a total of 46 studies were used in the meta-analysis.
An overview of the study characteristics of the included studies can be found in Table 1. There were 39 case–control studies, 4 cohort studies, and 3 cross-sectional studies; 40 publications reported on pesticides, 15 on herbicides, 15 on insecticides, and 9 on fungicides. Three studies included all parkinsonism (Duzcan et al. 2003; Engel et al. 2001a; Tanner et al. 2009); the rest studied idiopathic PD. Four studies showed only results in men (Engel et al. 2001a; Fall et al. 1999; Petersen et al. 2008; Petrovitch et al. 2002). One study included only cases with a disease diagnosis before 51 years of age (Butterfield et al. 1993), which is much lower than the average age of disease onset in all other studies (generally ~ 60 years of age). Information about participation rates was provided for only 13 of the 39 case–control studies. Studies that reported participation rates had rates between 69% and 100% for cases and between 41% and 100% for controls.
Figure 1 shows PD relative risk estimates for any pesticide exposure based on studies of occupational and/or nonoccupational exposures, and studies of occupational exposures only. The summary risk ratios (sRRs) between these two groups were very similar, with sRRs of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.06) and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.89), respectively, and an overall sRR for all studies combined of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.40, 1.88). The I2 for all studies combined was 63.7%. Only three studies estimated effects of nonoccupational exposure only (Chaturvedi et al. 1995; Elbaz et al. 2009; Firestone et al. 2005), with an sRR of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.63).
Forest plot for study-specific RRs and sRRs (95% CIs) of PD associated with the use of pesticides. The studies are ordered by publication year and stratified by studies that did or did not include nonoccupational exposure in the exposed group. Studies were pooled with the random effects method. The size of the squares reflects the statistical weight of the study in the meta-analyses.
Meta-analyses by herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide exposure are shown in Figure 2. In line with the results for any pesticide exposure, we did not observe noticeable differences between studies of occupational exposures only and studies of nonocccupational and occupational exposures combined. The sRR for exposure to fungicides did not indicate an association with PD (overall sRR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.40; Figure 2C), in contrast with positive sRRs for exposure to herbicides (overall sRR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.81; Figure 2A) and insecticides (overall sRR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.11; Figure 2B).
Forest plots for study-specific RRs and sRRs (95% CIs) of PD associated with the use of herbicides (A), insecticides (B), and fungicides (C). The studies are ordered by publication year and stratified by studies that did or did not include nonoccupational exposure in the exposed group. Studies were pooled with the random effects method. The size of the squares reflects the statistical weight of the study in the meta-analyses.
Funnel plots of effect estimates for exposure to pesticides and pesticide subcategories were suggestive of small study effects, with a tendency for smaller studies to report higher relative risks compared with larger studies (Figure 3), with Egger’s test p-values of 0.057, 0.338, 0.208, and 0.680 for pesticide, herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide effect estimates, respectively.
Funnel plots of studies included in the meta-analysis for the risk of PD associated with the use of pesticides (A), herbicides (B), insecticides (C), and fungicides (D). Circles represent studies that included nonoccupational exposure in the exposed group, and triangles represent studies that were based on occupational exposure only. Egger’s test p-values were 0.057, 0.338, 0.208, and 0.680 for pesticide, herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide effect estimates, respectively.
Figure 4 presents subgroup sRR estimates for those factors a priori hypothesized to be related to the observed heterogeneity in study results. The only study characteristic that was suggestive of contributing to heterogeneity was the exposure assessment method, with the lowest summary estimates observed for self-reported exposures (n = 36) and highest sRR for studies with exposures estimated based on reported job titles (n = 3). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.30). There was no evidence for a difference in summary estimates by adjustment of results for potential confounders, type of control population source, geographical area, or by study design. We also investigated whether adjustment for smoking had an effect on the summary risk estimate. Almost identical results were found for studies that did or did not correct for smoking (data not shown). Similar analyses for the subcategories herbicides and insecticides rendered similar results as for all pesticides (data not shown).
sRRs (95% CIs) for strata of exposure assessment method, statistical analysis, source of controls, study area, and study design. The p-value from meta-regression represents the p-value of the F-test in case of more than two categories, whereas it represents the p-value for the t-test in the case of the two statistical analysis strata.
Our systematic review indicated that PD is related to pesticide exposure with an sRR of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.40, 1.88). However, there was substantial heterogeneity among individual study estimates (I2 = 63.7%). Summary estimates also indicated positive associations of PD with herbicides and insecticides, but not with fungicides. We systematically investigated several factors that could explain heterogeneity in study results, but none appeared to be related to the observed heterogeneity, with the possible exception of the method of exposure assessment. Studies that based their exposure assessment on job titles reported somewhat higher risk estimates than studies that used self-reported exposures, but the difference did not reach statistical significance, in part because of low numbers of studies relying on job title and expert judgment.
Including persons who were nonoccupationally exposed to pesticides together with those occupationally exposed resulted in a very similar sRR. Given that occupational pesticide applications are in general more frequent and on larger areas than are nonoccupational exposures, one would have anticipated higher RRs for studies focusing only on occupational exposures. On the other hand, use of protective equipment during nonoccupational applications may be less. The fact that summary results were similar for both types of studies could indicate that nonoccupational and occupational pesticide exposures carry similar risks, or that most of the exposures in the combined studies were occupational. In the three studies that exclusively reported on nonoccupational pesticide exposures, only a small increase in relative risk was observed (sRR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.63), suggesting that risks associated with nonoccupational pesticide exposures are lower than from occupational exposures. Nevertheless, nonoccupational pesticide exposure cannot be ruled out as a risk factor for PD based on these analyses.
Studies used different methods for exposure assessment and assignment. Most studies (36 of 39) were based on self-reported exposure to pesticides, defined as ever versus never use or as regular versus nonregular use. No difference in sRR was seen between these two definitions of self-reported exposure, although it could have been expected that using a more stringent definition of exposure would have resulted in stronger associations. Studies that used reported job titles and expert judgment, and/or that used a job-exposure matrix to estimate exposures, resulted in a higher sRR compared with studies using self-reported pesticide exposures. This difference cannot be explained by recall bias, because in that case, higher risk ratios would have been expected for studies relying on self-reported exposures. A more likely explanation is that subjects are not able to reliably report exposures to pesticides, resulting in nondifferential exposure misclassification and bias toward the null (Daniels et al. 2001; Engel et al. 2001b). The fact that some heterogeneity is observed in study results by exposure assessment method indicates that this may be an important factor that should be taken into consideration when designing or interpreting studies.
A broad range of different pesticides exist with different chemical compositions and working mechanisms. In line with the conclusions of Brown et al. (2006), we found that both herbicides and insecticides, but not fungicides, were associated with PD. However, it is difficult to disentangle the effect of herbicides and insecticides given that the use of these two pesticide groups is often highly correlated. This is illustrated by the fact that we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.79 between the study-specific RRs of herbicides and insecticides. Few studies have focused on specific pesticides precluding any meaningful meta-analyses (Brighina et al. 2008; Elbaz et al. 2009; Engel et al. 2001a; Firestone et al. 2010; Hancock et al. 2008; Hertzman et al. 1994; Kamel et al. 2007; Liou et al. 1997; Seidler et al. 1996; Semchuk et al. 1992; Tanner et al. 2009; Vlajinac et al. 2010). However, it is interesting to note that the subgroup of organochlorines was significantly associated with PD in three studies (Elbaz et al. 2009; Hancock et al. 2008; Seidler et al. 1996). This is also in line with studies on biomarkers in serum (Richardson et al. 2009; Weisskopf et al. 2010) and in the brains of deceased patients (Corrigan et al. 2000; Fleming et al. 1994). Organochlorines are mainly insecticides, including DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), dieldrin, and heptachlor.
Funnel plots gave some indication for a small-study effect, such that larger effect estimates appeared to be associated with smaller studies, which suggests that the sRR might be slightly overestimated. In addition, the studies included were generally small, resulting in imprecise effect estimates that could have contributed to the substantial heterogeneity in study results. Meta-regression analyses provided no evidence for a difference in sRRs based on study design, geographical area, adjustment for potential confounders, or type of control population. As such, factors explaining the heterogeneity observed remain largely elusive. We were not able to investigate the effect of differences in criteria used for the diagnosis of PD because there was substantial variation in the exact inclusion criteria among the studies that reported on the criteria used. However, in most of the studies, the diagnosis was made by a physician and included the presence of two or three of the cardinal symptoms of PD, often with some additional inclusion and exclusion criteria. Variations in participation rates could also contribute to study heterogeneity. The ability to investigate this factor was limited because only 13 of the case–control studies reported participation rates. The same is true for differences across sex. Only 8 studies showed separate results for men and women, but the results were not conclusive: RRs were higher for men than for women in 3 studies (Baldi et al. 2003b; Frigerio et al. 2006; Hertzman et al. 1994), higher for women than men in 3 other studies (Chan et al. 1998; Elbaz et al. 2009; Firestone et al. 2010), and comparable between men and women in the remaining 2 studies (Ascherio et al. 2006; Brighina et al. 2008). Heterogeneity in the results could also arise from both quantitative and qualitative differences in types of agriculture in the study areas. Although we compared large regions (i.e., North America, Europe, and other), this analysis would not have captured regional differences in the types of agriculture and pesticides used. Analyses by time periods might provide some clues because pesticide use has changed over the decades, but data were insufficient to perform a meaningful analysis of changes over time.
Our overall summary risk estimates strongly suggest that exposure to pesticides, and to herbicides and/or insecticides in particular, increases the risk of developing PD. Heterogeneity among study-specific RRs could not easily be explained by methodological differences, except for a suggestive effect of exposure assessment characteristics. Future studies should therefore focus on using more objective semiquantitative methods for exposure assessment such as job- or crop-exposure matrices, rather than relying solely on self-report. Although classes of pesticides have been linked to PD, it remains important to identify the specific chemicals responsible for this association. Therefore, in new, preferably prospective studies, attention should be given to collecting detailed information on specific pesticide use.
- Ascherio A, Chen H, Weisskopf MG, O’Reilly E, McCullough ML, Calle EE, et al. 2006. Pesticide exposure and risk for Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 60(2):197–203.
- Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Vanni P, Ghetti A, Carbonin P, Amaducci L, et al. 2003. Lifestyle-related risk factors for Parkinson’s disease: a population-based study. Acta Neurol Scand 108(4):239–244.
- Baldi I, Cantagrel A, Lebailly P, Tison F, Dubroca B, Chrysostome V, et al. 2003a. Association between Parkinson’s disease and exposure to pesticides in southwestern France. Neuroepidemiology 22(5):305–310.
- Baldi I, Lebailly P, Mohammed-Brahim B, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, Brochard P. 2003b. Neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to pesticides in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 157(5):409–414.
- Behari M, Srivastava AK, Das RR, Pandey RM. 2001. Risk factors of Parkinson’s disease in Indian patients. J Neurol Sci 190(1–2):49–55.
- Bekris LM, Mata IF, Zabetian CP. 2010. The genetics of Parkinson disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 23(4):228–242..; doi:10.1177/0891988710383572 [Online 11 October 2010]
- Brighina L, Frigerio R, Schneider NK, Lesnick TG, de Andrade M, Cunningham JM, et al. 2008. α-synuclein, pesticides, and Parkinson disease: a case-control study. Neurology 70(16 pt 2):1461–1469.
- Brown TP, Rumsby PC, Capleton AC, Rushton L, Levy LS. 2006. Pesticides and Parkinson’s disease—is there a link? Environ Health Perspect 114:156–164.
- Butterfield PG, Valanis BG, Spencer PS, Lindeman CA, Nutt JG. 1993. Environmental antecedents of young-onset Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 43(6):1150–1158.
- Chan DK, Woo J, Ho SC, Pang CP, Law LK, Ng PW, et al. 1998. Genetic and environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease in a Chinese population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65(5):781–784.
- Chaturvedi S, Ostbye T, Stoessl AJ, Merskey H, Hachinski V. 1995. Environmental exposures in elderly Canadians with Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci 22(3):232–234.
- Corrigan FM, Wienburg CL, Shore RF, Daniel SE, Mann D. 2000. Organochlorine insecticides in substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. J Toxicol Environ Health A 59(4):229–234.
- Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Teschke K, Hertz-Picciotto I, Savitz DA, Blatt J. 2001. Comparison of assessment methods for pesticide exposure in a case-control interview study. Am J Epidemiol 153(12):1227–1232.
- De Palma G, Mozzoni P, Mutti A, Calzetti S, Negrotti A.. 1998. Case-control study of interactions between genetic and environmental factors in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 352(9145):1986–1987.
- DerSimonian R, Laird N.. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188.
- Dick FD, De Palma G, Ahmadi A, Scott NW, Prescott GJ, Bennett J, et al. 2007. Environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: the Geoparkinson study. Occup Environ Med 64(10):666–672.
- Duzcan F, Zencir M, Ozdemir F, Cetin GO, Bagci H, Heutink P, et al. 2003. Familial influence on parkinsonism in a rural area of Turkey (kizilcaboluk-denizli): a community-based case-control study. Mov Disord 18(7):799–804.
- Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C.. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634.
- Elbaz A, Clavel J, Rathouz PJ, Moisan F, Galanaud JP, Delemotte B, et al. 2009. Professional exposure to pesticides and Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 66(4):494–504.
- Engel LS, Checkoway H, Keifer MC, Seixas NS, Longstreth WT Jr, Scott KC, et al. 2001a. Parkinsonism and occupational exposure to pesticides. Occup Environ Med 58(9):582–589.
- Engel LS, Seixas NS, Keifer MC, Longstreth WT Jr, Checkoway H. 2001b. Validity study of self-reported pesticide exposure among orchardists. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11(5):359–368.; doi:.10.1038/sj.jea.7500176
- Fall PA, Fredrikson M, Axelson O, Granerus AK. 1999. Nutritional and occupational factors influencing the risk of Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in southeastern Sweden. Mov Disord 14(1):28–37.
- Firestone JA, Lundin JI, Powers KM, Smith-Weller T, Franklin GM, Swanson PD, et al. 2010. Occupational factors and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study. Am J Ind Med 53(3):217–223.; doi:10.1002/ajim.20788 [Online 18 December 2009]
- Firestone JA, Smith-Weller T, Franklin G, Swanson P, Longstreth WT Jr, Checkoway H. 2005. Pesticides and risk of Parkinson disease: a population-based case-control study. Arch Neurol 62(1):91–95.
- Fleming L, Mann JB, Bean J, Briggle T, Sanchez-Ramos JR. 1994. Parkinson’s disease and brain levels of organochlorine pesticides. Ann Neurol 36(1):100–103.; doi:10.1002/ana.410360119 [Online 8 October 2004]
- Fong CS, Cheng CW, Wu RM. 2005. Pesticides exposure and genetic polymorphism of paraoxonase in the susceptibility of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Taiwan 14(2):55–60.
- Fong CS, Wu RM, Shieh JC, Chao YT, Fu YP, Kuao CL, et al. 2007. Pesticide exposure on southwestern Taiwanese with MnSOD and NQO1 polymorphisms is associated with increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. Clin Chim Acta 378(1–2):136–141.; doi:10.1016/j.cca.2006.11.006 [Online 17 November 2006]
- Frigerio R, Sanft KR, Grossardt BR, Peterson BJ, Elbaz A, Bower JH, et al. 2006. Chemical exposures and Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study. Mov Disord 21(10):1688–1692.
- Golbe LI, Farrell TM, Davis PH. 1990. Follow-up study of early-life protective and risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 5(1):66–70.
- Gorell JM, Johnson CC, Rybicki BA, Peterson EL, Richardson RJ. 1998. The risk of Parkinson’s disease with exposure to pesticides, farming, well water, and rural living. Neurology 50(5):1346–1350.
- Hancock DB, Martin ER, Mayhew GM, Stajich JM, Jewett R, Stacy MA, et al. 2008. Pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a family-based case-control study. BMC Neurol 8:6.; doi:10.1186/1471-2377-8-6 [Online 28 March 2008]
- Herishanu YO, Medvedovski M, Goldsmith JR, Kordysh E. 2001. A case-control study of Parkinson’s disease in urban population of southern Israel. Can J Neurol Sci 28(2):144–147.
- Hertzman C, Wiens M, Snow B, Kelly S, Calne D.. 1994. A case-control study of Parkinson’s disease in a horticultural region of British Columbia. Mov Disord 9(1):69–75.
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560.; doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 [Online 4 September 2003]
- Ho SC, Woo J, Lee CM. 1989. Epidemiologic study of Parkinson’s disease in Hong Kong. Neurology 39(10):1314–1318.
- Hubble JP, Cao T, Hassanein RE, Neuberger JS, Koller WC. 1993. Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 43(9):1693–1697.
- Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Mateo D, Gimenez-Roldan S. 1992. Exposure to well water and pesticides in Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in the Madrid area. Mov Disord 7(2):149–152.
- Kamel F, Tanner C, Umbach D, Hoppin J, Alavanja M, Blair A, et al. 2007. Pesticide exposure and self-reported Parkinson’s disease in the agricultural health study. Am J Epidemiol 165(4):364–374.
- Koller W, Vetere-Overfield B, Gray C, Alexander C, Chin T, Dolezal J, et al. 1990. Environmental risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 40(8):1218–1221.
- Kuopio AM, Marttila RJ, Helenius H, Rinne UK. 1999. Environmental risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 14(6):928–939.
- Li AA, Mink PJ, McIntosh LJ, Teta MJ, Finley B. 2005. Evaluation of epidemiologic and animal data associating pesticides with Parkinson’s disease. J Occup Environ Med 47(10):1059–1087.
- Liou HH, Tsai MC, Chen CJ, Jeng JS, Chang YC, Chen SY, et al. 1997. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in Taiwan. Neurology 48(6):1583–1588.
- Manthripragada AD, Costello S, Cockburn MG, Bronstein JM, Ritz B. 2010. Paraoxonase 1, agricultural organophosphate exposure, and Parkinson disease. Epidemiology 21(1):87–94.; doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c15ec6
- McCann SJ, LeCouteur DG, Green AC, Brayne C, Johnson AG, Chan D, et al. 1998. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in an Australian population. Neuroepidemiology 17(6):310–317.
- Menegon A, Board PG, Blackburn AC, Mellick GD, Le Couteur DG. 1998. Parkinson’s disease, pesticides, and glutathione transferase polymorphisms. Lancet 352(9137):1344–1346.
- Morano A, Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Molina JA, Antolin MA. 1994. Risk-factors for Parkinson’s disease: case-control study in the province of Caceres, Spain. Acta Neurol Scand 89(3):164–170.
- Nuti A, Ceravolo R, Dell’Agnello G, Gambaccini G, Bellini G, Kiferle L, et al. 2004. Environmental factors and Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in the Tuscany region of Italy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 10(8):481–485.
- Petersen MS, Halling J, Bech S, Wermuth L, Weihe P, Nielsen F, et al. 2008. Impact of dietary exposure to food contaminants on the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotoxicology 29(4):584–590.; doi:.10.1016/j.neuro.2008.03.001
- Petrovitch H, Ross GW, Abbott RD, Sanderson WT, Sharp DS, Tanner CM, et al. 2002. Plantation work and risk of Parkinson disease in a population-based longitudinal study. Arch Neurol 59(11):1787–1792.
- Preux PM, Condet A, Anglade C, Druet-Cabanac M, Debrock C, Macharia W, et al. 2000. Parkinson’s disease and environmental factors. Matched case-control study in the Limousin region, France. Neuroepidemiology 19(6):333–337.
- Priyadarshi A, Khuder SA, Schaub EA, Shrivastava S. 2000. A meta-analysis of Parkinson’s disease and exposure to pesticides. Neurotoxicology 21(4):435–440.
- Richardson JR, Shalat SL, Buckley B, Winnik B, O’Suilleabhain P, Diaz-Arrastia R, et al. 2009. Elevated serum pesticide levels and risk of Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 66(7):870–875.; doi:.10.1001/archneurol.2009.89
- Seidler A, Hellenbrand W, Robra BP, Vieregge P, Nischan P, Joerg J, et al. 1996. Possible environmental, occupational, and other etiologic factors for Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in Germany. Neurology 46(5):1275–1284.
- Semchuk KM, Love EJ, Lee RG. 1992. Parkinson’s disease and exposure to agricultural work and pesticide chemicals. Neurology 42(7):1328–1335.
- Semchuk KM, Love EJ, Lee RG. 1993. Parkinson’s disease: a test of the multifactorial etiologic hypothesis. Neurology 43(6):1173–1180.
- Shulman JM, De Jager PL, Feany MB. 2011. Parkinson’s disease: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol 6:193–222.; doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110–130242
- Smargiassi A, Mutti A, De Rosa A, De Palma G, Negrotti A, Calzetti S.. 1998. A case-control study of occupational and environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Neurotoxicology 19(4–5):709–712.
- Stern M, Dulaney E, Gruber SB, Golbe L, Bergen M, Hurtig H, et al. 1991. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. A case-control study of young-onset and old-onset patients. Arch Neurol 48(9):903–907.
- Tanner CM, Ross GW, Jewell SA, Hauser RA, Jankovic J, Factor SA, et al. 2009. Occupation and risk of parkinsonism: a multicenter case-control study. Arch Neurol 66(9):1106–1113.
- Taylor CA, Saint-Hilaire MH, Cupples LA, Thomas CA, Burchard AE, Feldman RG, et al. 1999. Environmental, medical, and family history risk factors for Parkinson’s disease: a New England-based case control study. Am J Med Genet 88(6):742–749.
- Vlaanderen J, Lan Q, Kromhout H, Rothman N, Vermeulen R.. 2011. Occupational benzene exposure and the risk of lymphoma subtypes: a meta-analysis of cohort studies incorporating three study quality dimensions. Environ Health Perspect 119:159–167.
- Vlajinac HD, Sipetic SB, Maksimovic JM, Marinkovic JM, Dzoljic ED, Ratkov IS, et al. 2010. Environmental factors and Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in Belgrade, Serbia. Int J Neurosci 120(5):361–367.; doi:10.3109/00207451003668374
- Weisskopf MG, Knekt P, O’Reilly EJ, Lyytinen J, Reunanen A, Laden F, et al. 2010. Persistent organochlorine pesticides in serum and risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology 74(13):1055–1061.; doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d76a93 [Online 30 March 2010]
- Werneck AL, Alvarenga H. 1999. Genetics, drugs and environmental factors in Parkinson’s disease. A case-control study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 57(2B):347–355.
- Wong GF, Gray CS, Hassanein RS, Koller WC. 1991. Environmental risk factors in siblings with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 48(3):287–289.
- Zayed J, Ducic S, Campanella G, Panisset JC, Andre P, Masson H, et al. 1990. Environmental factors in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci 17(3):286–291.
- Zorzon M, Capus L, Pellegrino A, Cazzato G, Zivadinov R.. 2002. Familial and environmental risk factors in Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in north-east Italy. Acta Neurol Scand 105(2):77–82.
As we begin a new year, we are highlighting EHP articles that attracted the most viewers in 2016: (more…)
Since 1993 the News section of EHP has provided readers with objective, accurate information on timely environmental health topics. After years as one of the most popular features of EHP, and as our main tool for reaching a broader audience, we felt it was time the News had its own home on our website. We are now pleased to present our brand-new page devoted exclusively to EHP News! (more…)
EHP is proud to announce that “Acute Impact of Hourly Ambient Air Pollution on Preterm Birth,” published in EHP on 29 April 2016, has been selected by the Children’s Environmental Health Network (CEHN) as its November 2016 Article of the Month. CEHN Article of the Month summaries discuss the potential policy implications of current children’s environmental health research. The CEHN summary can be viewed here.