News | Science Selections March 2014 | Volume 122 | Issue 3
Hidden Blue Hazard? LED Lighting and Retinal Damage in Rats
Tim Lougheed has worked as a freelance writer in Ottawa, Canada, since 1991. A past president of the Canadian Science Writers’ Association, he covers a broad range of topics in science, technology, medicine, and education.
Related EHP Article
The Canadian government greeted 2014 with the first tier of its new energy-efficiency standards for light bulbs,1 which will effectively ban incandescent light bulbs by next year.2 But efficient lighting can have its own drawbacks. For instance, although devoid of the mercury used in compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), some white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) emit a wavelength of light associated with adverse human health effects. In this issue of EHP, researchers study retinal changes in rats exposed to white LEDs like those sometimes used in household lighting.3
Among the most popular household LEDs are products that employ a chip emitting blue light, which is surrounded by a yellow phosphor coating. Although the resulting light looks white to the naked eye, it can feature a spike in the blue end of the spectrum, at wavelengths of 460–500 nm.
Light of this wavelength has been shown to have unique physiological effects, some positive, some negative.4,5,6 White LEDs, as a new source of exposure to blue light, initially prompted concerns about potential changes in melatonin production and disruption of human sleep cycles.7 More recent research considers the direct effect of this light on the eye, including the risk of ongoing damage to retinal cells.8
In the current study, the researchers wanted to accurately simulate exposure to indoor lighting, says corresponding author Chang-Ho Yang, a professor and ophthalmologist at National Taiwan University’s College of Medicine. He points out that earlier work shone light directly into the eyes of experimental animals, which may induce damage but hardly corresponds to the indirect way in which most people are exposed to artificial lighting.
“We created an exposure environment where rats could run freely in a cage with the light source set on the rack ceiling twenty centimeters above the cage roof,” Yang explains. “This mimics the ‘domestic lighting’ condition as much as possible, which should greatly reduce the injury—theoretically.”
Source: Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy; https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ssl/sslbasics_ledbasics.html
However, the retinas of rats exposed to either blue or cool white9 LED light showed evidence of retinal damage and cell death after 9 days of exposure. Although rats exposed to cool or warm white10 CFL lights also showed some evidence of damage relative to unexposed controls, in general differences were much less pronounced than those observed in the LED-exposed rats. The authors suggest the observed injuries may have been a consequence of oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species that were generated in retinal tissue.3
The rats used in these experiments were albino, and their unpigmented eyes were more sensitive to all effects of light. But even in typically pigmented eyes, Yang says, neuronal cells are incapable of repairing themselves or regenerating after damage. This makes it important to pin down mechanisms of injury and link them with clinical studies matching the conditions under which people will ultimately be using LED lighting. Future studies may suggest a spectrum threshold that could help the lighting industry optimize eye-friendly products, he notes.
Blue light is not without its virtues, says Seang Mei Saw, a professor of epidemiology and ophthalmology at the National University of Singapore, whose work deals with the onset of myopia in children. Time outdoors has shown a strong protective effect against myopia,11 and although the reasons are still undetermined, it’s possible blue light may play a role, Saw says—a hypothesis supported by evidence from animal studies.12 “Outdoor sunlight has more blue light that may protect for myopia,” she explains, “and indoor lighting, with relatively less blue light, may be detrimental for myopia.”
References and Notes
1. Natural Resources Canada. General Service Lamps [website]. Brampton, Ontario, Canada:Natural Resources Canada, Government of Canada (modified 15 January 2014). Available: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/products/6869 [accessed 14 February 2014].
2. Federal ban ignites rush on old-style light bulbs. CBC News Manitoba, Canada section (2 January 2014). Available: http://goo.gl/boKyKw [accessed 14 February 2014].
3. Shang Y-M, et al. White light–emitting diodes (LEDs) at domestic lighting levels and retinal injury in a rat model. Environ Health Perspect 122(3):269–276 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307294.
4. McDonagh AF, et al. Blue light and bilirubin excretion. Science 208(4440):145–151 (1980); http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7361112.
5. Lockley SW, et al. High sensitivity of the human circadian melatonin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(9):4502–4505 (2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030570.
6. Vandewalle G, et al. Spectral quality of light modulates emotional brain responses in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(45):19549–19554 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010180107.
7. West KE, et al. Blue light from light-emitting diodes elicits a dose-dependent suppression of melatonin in humans. J Appl Physiol 110(3):619–626 (2011); http://jap.physiology.org/content/110/3/619.long.
8. Behar-Cohen F, et al. Light-emitting diodes (LED) for domestic lighting: any risks for the eye? Prog Retin Eye Res 30(4):239–257 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.04.002.
9. Both LED light sources had a perceived color “temperature” of 6,500 kelvins (K). The higher the kelvin temperature, the cooler the light appears. Typical incandescent bulbs have a color temperature of approximately 3,000 K.
11. Lougheed T. Myopia: the evidence for environmental factors. Environ Health Perspect 122(1):A12–A19 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A12.
12. Rucker FJ, Wallman J. Chick eyes compensate for chromatic simulations of hyperopic and myopic defocus: evidence that the eye uses longitudinal chromatic aberration to guide eye-growth. Vision Res 49(14):1775–1783 (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.014.
EHP is pleased to announce that Prenatal Exposure to Glycol Ethers and Neurocognitive Abilities in 6-Year-Old Children: The PELAGIE Cohort Study, published in EHP on 14 October 2016, has been selected by the Children’s Environmental Health Network (CEHN) as its May 2017 Article of the Month. CEHN Article of the Month summaries discuss the potential policy implications of current children’s environmental health research. The CEHN summary can be viewed here.
Among the Resources now available on our Children’s Health page is the text of Executive Order 13045, “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (21 April 1997). The Executive Order noted the particular vulnerabilities of children to environmental hazards, codified the need to identify and alleviate such risks, and created the President’s Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children to identify data resources and promote research in these areas. As we mark 20 years since the order was enacted, we can see how these efforts have produced important research and mitigation of hazards—a strong base for continued work on behalf of children’s environmental health.
EHP is excited to announce that, starting later in May 2017, the journal will transition from a traditional, issue-by-issue publishing model, to a new, article-by-article publishing model known as continuous publication. This is a more modern way of publishing an online journal, and one that should help to significantly improve EHP’s time to publication. (more…)