Skip to content

Environmental Health Perspectives

Facebook Page EHP Twitter Feed Open Access icon  

Science Selection Volume 123 | 2015

Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.123-A134

Air Pollution and Diabetes Risk: Assessing the Evidence to Date

Wendee Nicole was awarded the inaugural Mongabay Prize for Environmental Reporting in 2013. She writes for Discover, Scientific American, National Wildlife, and other magazines.

About This Article open

Citation: Nicole W. 2015. Air pollution and diabetes risk: assessing the evidence to date. Environ Health Perspect 123:A134; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.123-A134

News Topics: Air Pollution, Endocrine Health, Endocrine Disruptors, Inflammation, Ozone, Particulate Matter (PM)

Published: 1 May 2015

PDF icon PDF Version (861 KB)

Related EHP Article

Association Between Ambient Air Pollution and Diabetes Mellitus in Europe and North America: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ikenna C. Eze, Lars G. Hemkens, Heiner C. Bucher, Barbara Hoffmann, Christian Schindler, Nino Künzli, Tamara Schikowski, and Nicole M. Probst-Hensch

Many studies have reported associations between ambient air pollution and cardiovascular disease, asthma, and cancer.1 Diabetes mellitus also is a risk factor for vascular and respiratory diseases, and development of these outcomes in people with diabetes may be exacerbated by exposure to air pollution.2 In this issue of EHP, a team of European scientists conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether air pollution exposure is also associated with developing diabetes itself.3

The researchers systematically searched databases for English-language articles addressing diabetes and outdoor air pollution in human subjects. They screened 636 studies and identified 13 that addressed the research question of interest. Eight pertained to type 2 diabetes, two pertained to type 1 diabetes, and three pertained to gestational diabetes. Seven of the studies on type 2 diabetes—selected because they reported air particle concentrations the same way—were pooled in a meta-analysis.

Women and men at an outdoor restaurant Subclinical inflammation, which can be caused by exposure to particulate matter, is “a major driving force” behind diabetes.

© Atlantide Phototravel/Corbis

Based on three available longitudinal studies on exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), the authors estimated a 10% increased risk of type 2 diabetes per 10-mg/m3 increase in exposure. For nitrogen dioxide (NO2), there were two longitudinal and two cross-sectional studies available, which suggested an 8% increase in type 2 diabetes per 10-mg/m3 increase in exposure.3

For both NO2 and PM2.5, estimated effects were more pronounced in females than males.3 “This was one of the surprising findings of our study, considering that men are usually at higher risk for type 2 diabetes,” says coauthor Ikenna Eze, a PhD candidate at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. “There could also be some unexplained sex-based physiologic differences which could account for this.” Alternatively, women generally tend to stay around the home more than men,4 hence residence-based exposure estimates may have better captured their actual exposures.

Positive associations reported in the epidemiologic literature give credence to the hypothesis that air pollution exposure may increase the risk of developing diabetes, says Patricia Coogan, an epidemiology research professor at Boston University and coauthor of one of the studies reviewed.5 “Even more convincing, I think, are the animal and clinical studies indicating that air pollution can affect insulin sensitivity and other biologic pathways relevant to diabetes,” Coogan says.

Ursula Krämer, a professor at the IUF-Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine whose study was included in the meta-analysis,6 believes the association between air pollution exposure and development of diabetes is plausible. “Subclinical inflammation is a major driving force for the incidence of diabetes, and particle pollution can cause subclinical inflammation,” she says. “I fully agree with the main conclusion of the authors: Research should be expanded to developing countries, where a steep increase in diabetes type 2 was observed in the last decade and where outdoor and indoor pollution is much higher than in Europe and North America.”


References

1. Lim SS, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2224–2260 (2012); doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.

2. Janghorbani M, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of air pollution exposure and risk of diabetes. Eur J Epidemiol 29(4):231–242 (2014); doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9907-2.

3. Eze IC, et al. Association between ambient air pollution and diabetes mellitus in Europe and North America: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 123(5):381–389 (2015); doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307823.

4. Brook RD, et al. The relationship between diabetes mellitus and traffic-related air pollution. J Occup Environ Med 50(1):32–38 (2008); doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31815dba70.

5. Coogan PF, et al. Air pollution and incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in black women living in Los Angeles. Circulation 125(6):767–772 (2012); doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.052753.

6. Krämer U, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and incident type 2 diabetes: results from the SALIA cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 118(9):1273–1279 (2010); doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901689.



WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien