Skip to content

Environmental Health Perspectives

Facebook Page EHP Twitter Feed Open Access icon  

Research Volume 124 | 2016

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307736

Vehicular Traffic–Related Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence: The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP)

Irina Mordukhovich,1 Jan Beyea,2 Amy H. Herring,3,4 Maureen Hatch,5 Steven D. Stellman,6 Susan L. Teitelbaum,7 David B. Richardson,1 Robert C. Millikan,1* Lawrence S. Engel,1 Sumitra Shantakumar,8 Susan E. Steck,9 Alfred I. Neugut,6,10 Pavel Rossner Jr.,11,12 Regina M. Santella,11 and Marilie D. Gammon1

Author Affiliations open
1Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; 2Consulting in the Public Interest, Lambertville, New Jersey, USA; 3Department of Biostatistics, and 4Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; 5Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 6Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; 7Department of Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 8GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Singapore; 9Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; 10Department of Medicine, and; 11Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; 12Laboratory of Genetic Ecotoxicology, Institute of Experimental Medicine AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic

PDF icon PDF Version (209 KB)

  • Background: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are widespread environmental pollutants, known human lung carcinogens, and potent mammary carcinogens in laboratory animals. However, the association between PAHs and breast cancer in women is unclear. Vehicular traffic is a major ambient source of PAH exposure.

    Objectives: Our study aim was to evaluate the association between residential exposure to vehicular traffic and breast cancer incidence.

    Methods: Residential histories of 1,508 participants with breast cancer (case participants) and 1,556 particpants with no breast cancer (control participants) were assessed in a population-based investigation conducted in 1996–1997. Traffic exposure estimates of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), as a proxy for traffic-related PAHs, for the years 1960–1995 were reconstructed using a model previously shown to generate estimates consistent with measured soil PAHs, PAH–DNA adducts, and CO readings. Associations between vehicular traffic exposure estimates and breast cancer incidence were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression.

    Results: The odds ratio (95% CI) was modestly elevated by 1.44 (0.78, 2.68) for the association between breast cancer and long-term 1960–1990 vehicular traffic estimates in the top 5%, compared with below the median. The association with recent 1995 traffic exposure was elevated by 1.14 (0.80, 1.64) for the top 5%, compared with below the median, which was stronger among women with low fruit/vegetable intake [1.46 (0.89, 2.40)], but not among those with high fruit/vegetable intake [0.92 (0.53, 1.60)]. Among the subset of women with information regarding traffic exposure and tumor hormone receptor subtype, the traffic–breast cancer association was higher for those with estrogen/progesterone-negative tumors [1.67 (0.91, 3.05) relative to control participants], but lower among all other tumor subtypes [0.80 (0.50, 1.27) compared with control participants].

    Conclusions: In our population-based study, we observed positive associations between vehicular traffic-related B[a]P exposure and breast cancer incidence among women with comparatively high long-term traffic B[a]P exposures, although effect estimates were imprecise.

  • Citation: Mordukhovich I, Beyea J, Herring AH, Hatch M, Stellman SD, Teitelbaum SL, Richardson DB, Millikan RC, Engel LS, Shantakumar S, Steck SE, Neugut AI, Rossner P Jr., Santella RM, Gammon MD. 2016. Vehicular traffic–related polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and breast cancer incidence: the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP). Environ Health Perspect 124:30–38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307736

    *Deceased as of 7 October 2012.

    Address correspondence to I. Mordukhovich, Exposure, Epidemiology and Risk Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Landmark Center, 401 Park Dr., Boston, MA 02215 USA. Telephone: (617) 384-8754. E-mail: imordukh@hsph.harvard.edu

    This work was supported in part by awards from the U.S. Department of Defense (BC100414, BC972772), the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (CA/ES66572, P30ES009089, P30ES10126, T32CA09330, and T32ES007018), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Columbia University Women at Risk Program, and gifts from private citizens.

    J.B. is employed by Consulting in the Public Interest Inc. S.S. participated in this research during her time as a doctoral student at UNC Chapel Hill and is currently an employee and shareholder of GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore. Neither GlaxoSmithKline nor anyone connected to litigation provided any funding for this analysis. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

    Received: 17 October 2013
    Accepted: 19 May 2015
    Advance Publication: 22 May 2015
    Final Publication: 1 January 2016

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

  • PDF icon Supplemental Material PDF (292 KB)

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP has provided a 508-conformant table of contents summarizing the Supplemental Material for this article (see below) so readers with disabilities may determine whether they wish to access the full, nonconformant Supplemental Material. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

    PDF icon Supplemental Table of Contents PDF (98 KB)

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the United States [American Cancer Society (ACS) 2011]. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous pollutants formed from incomplete combustion (Boström et al. 2002). PAHs are genotoxic prooxidants, confirmed human lung carcinogens, and potent mammary carcinogens in laboratory animals [International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2010]. However, the association between PAHs and breast cancer in women is unclear (Gammon and Santella 2008). Previous population studies have reported associations between PAH-related exposures and breast cancer. For example, PAHs bind to DNA, including in breast tissue, and the resulting DNA adducts have been associated with breast cancer in epidemiological studies, although the research is scant (Gammon et al. 2002bRundle et al. 2000). PAH–DNA adducts reflect short-term exposures (Gammon et al. 2002b), whereas breast cancer is thought to develop over many years. Thus, it is of interest to evaluate longer-term PAH exposures in relation to breast cancer risk.

Vehicular traffic is a major ambient source of PAH exposure, especially near urban areas (Fromme et al. 2004). To our knowledge, all previous studies on traffic or air pollution exposure and breast cancer have reported some positive associations between breast cancer and at least one air pollution exposure surrogate (Bonner et al. 2005Crouse et al. 2010Lewis-Michl et al. 1996Nie et al. 2007Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011). In some cases, the effect estimates were close to the null [for example, 1.16 (0.89, 1.51); Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011]. The exposure assessment methods in these previous reports varied. Some investigations relied on simple traffic density data or sparse monitors, evaluated relatively brief periods of exposure, or focused on nitrogen oxides rather than carcinogenic particulate pollution. Further progress requires sophisticated modeling to reconstruct long-term cumulative exposures to ambient PAHs.

Breast cancer risk factor profiles differ by menopausal status and tumor subtype (ACS 2011Chen and Colditz 2007), and fruits and vegetables may modify the carcinogenic effects of PAHs via antioxidant and other chemopreventive properties (Hecht 2000Jin et al. 2006). However, whether the association between ambient PAHs and breast cancer varies by fruit/vegetable intake, tumor characteristics, or menopausal status is not well understood.

Our population-based study aimed to estimate the association between breast cancer incidence and vehicular traffic, overall and within subgroups of women classified according to fruit/vegetable intake, menopausal status, and tumor subtype. For the study reported here, we used long-term, individualized residential traffic benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) exposure estimates (as a proxy for exposure to particulate traffic PAHs), which were reconstructed using a historical, geographic exposure model that was consistent with a varied set of environmental measurements (Beyea et al. 2006). It is important to help clarify the association between traffic PAHs and breast cancer given the high incidence of breast cancer and broad exposure to traffic pollution worldwide.

Materials and Methods

We used resources from the case–control component of the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP), a population-based investigation conducted among women residing in Nassau and Suffolk counties in Long Island, New York (Gammon et al. 2002a). All participating institutions provided institutional review board approval for this study, and all participants gave their written informed consent prior to study enrollment.

Study population. Eligible case participants were diagnosed with a first primary invasive or in situ breast cancer between August 1996 and July 1997 and were identified via rapid case ascertainment through contact with local pathology departments (Gammon et al. 2002a). Eligible control participants were women with no history of breast cancer and were identified using random digit dialing (Waksberg 1978) for women < 65 years old and Health Care Finance Administration records for women ≥ 65 years old. Controls were frequency matched based on the expected 5-year age distribution among the case participants. Case–control sample sizes taking into account LIBCSP subject selection procedures, participation rates, and vehicular traffic exposure data availability are presented in the Supplemental Material, Table S1.

The respondents included 1,508 case participants and 1,556 control participants (82.1% and 62.7% of eligible participants, respectively), who ranged between 20 and 98 years of age and were mostly postmenopausal (67.4%) and white (92.8%); the racial distribution reflects that of the study counties at the time of data collection (Gammon et al. 2002a). More than 50% of the study participants reported a household income ≥ $50,000 in the year prior to the study interview (Gammon et al. 2002a). Among women with traffic exposure information in the year 1995, 203 presented with in situ breast cancer and 1,071 presented with invasive breast cancer.

In previous LIBCSP reports, we found that breast cancer incidence was associated with early age at menarche, few or no births, and little or no breastfeeding (Gammon et al. 2002aShantakumar et al. 2007); increased body size (Eng et al. 2005); little or no physical activity (McCullough et al. 2012); low fruit/vegetable intake (Gaudet et al. 2004); low flavonoid intake (Fink et al. 2007); increased blood levels of PAH–DNA adducts (Gammon et al. 2002b); long-term residential environmental tobacco smoke exposure (Gammon et al. 2004); and increased grilled/smoked food intake (Steck et al. 2007).

Study questionnaire. Trained interviewers administered an at-home, 2-hr structured questionnaire within a few months of diagnosis (case participants) or study recruitment (control participants). Detailed questionnaire information included residential history, household income, educational attainment, race, religion, reproductive and medical histories, smoking, exogenous hormone use, and body size (Gammon et al. 2002a). A validated Block food frequency questionnaire (Block et al. 19861990) was self-completed by 98% of case and control participants and assessed typical dietary intake during the year prior to the interview, including intake of fruits, fruit juices, and vegetables (Gaudet et al. 2004).

Tumor Subtypes. Medical records were abstracted for 1,402 case participants to ascertain tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status subtypes (Gammon et al. 2002aYang et al. 2011Yasui and Potter 1999). Mutations in exons 5–8 of the tumor p53 gene (TP53) were determined using archived, paraffin-embedded tissue (n = 859) (Rossner et al. 2009). Briefly, the extracted tumor DNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), screened via the Surveyor Mutation Detection Kit (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE, USA), and possible mutations were confirmed with an ABI 3100 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc, Foster City, CA, USA).

Traffic B[a]P exposure assessment. Interviewers collected information regarding participants’ lifetime residential histories in Nassau and Suffolk counties only. Addresses at which a woman resided for at least 1 year were recorded and geocoded using BLR software (now part of Geographic Data Technology Inc., Lebanon, NH). Digital street maps were based on Census “Tiger” maps (http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data​/tiger.html), which provide residence numbers at the start and end of a straight line street segment. The locations of intervening residence numbers were obtained by linear interpolation. The percentage of addresses that geocoded successfully ranged between 60% in the 1960s and 85% in 1995 (Beyea et al. 2005), and 87% of participants provided at least one address that geocoded to the street level.

The traffic B[a]P exposure model (Beyea et al. 200520062013) used a road network comprising approximately 500,000 street segments in the New York metropolitan area, which includes Nassau and Suffolk counties. Emissions for each street segment were calculated as the product of hourly roadway-specific traffic counts and average U.S. tailpipe emissions for the years 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990. Estimates for other years between 1960 and 1995 were derived via interpolation or extrapolation. Vehicular traffic B[a]P estimates included adjustment for acceleration/deceleration at intersections (Beyea et al. 2006). Emissions within 80 km of the study area were directly calculated, and the exposure model also included a background term (proportional to exposures from the 22 counties just outside of the 2-county study area) to account for more distant roads (Beyea et al. 2006). Tailpipe emission parameters were derived from road tunnel measurements throughout the United States and were checked using measurements on vehicles run on dynamometer test beds (Beyea et al. 2008). As previously reported by Beyea et al. (2006), roadway traffic counts were obtained from over 13,000 annual average daily traffic measurements recorded in state and county records. All roads for which traffic counts were collected on Long Island by New York State, New York City, and Nassau and Suffolk counties were included in the direct emission model. Traffic counts for Nassau and Suffolk counties were taken from paper maps and entered into a geographic information system (see Supplemental Figure S1). For other counties, those roads for which counts were collected by New York State were included. Additional road counts were assumed to be proportional to the counts on major roads. Then, it was possible to scale “outer county” emissions to estimate total emissions from these counties, obtaining the scale factor as part of the fit to soil PAH data in the yards of study participants.

Roadway emissions were translated into predicted residential ambient B[a]P concentrations, considered a surrogate for exposure to all traffic PAHs, using standard meteorological dispersion and deposition models (Beyea et al. 2006Chock 1978Viegele and Head 1978). Up to 100 m from a road, traffic B[a]P levels were estimated using highway line-source puff models (Chock 1978). Beyond 100 m, a standard Gaussian plume model with Briggs dispersion parameters (Viegele and Head 1978), which incorporated data on wind speed and direction, rain washout, photo decay, and particle deposition, was used (Beyea et al. 2006). Meteorological data were collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory (year 1993), which was used as the standard for all years between 1960 and 1995. Changing the year (1990) or location (MacArthur Airport) of meteorological data collection for a sensitivity analysis did not appreciably alter exposure estimates (Beyea et al. 2005).

Model validation. The exposure model was modified to predict measured residential soil and carpet PAH levels among women living at their current address for at least 15 years, PAH–DNA adduct levels in circulating mononuclear cells collected at the time of the interview, and monitoring data for carbon monoxide, a traffic-related pollutant. Details of the model validation process are described by Beyea et al. (2006). Briefly, the model predicted soil PAHs, PAH–DNA adduct levels, and carbon monoxide concentrations, but not PAH levels in carpet dust. Specifically, when model predictions were compared with soil data, no deviation from linearity was apparent, and the R2-value was 86%. The fit to quantile data for PAH–DNA adducts was similar, though not quite as strong, with an R2-value of 58%. When examining the fit of the model to hourly CO data, the R2-value was 63%, even though the R2-value for the correlation between hourly CO emissions and concentrations was only 3.3% owing to the lag between CO emissions from tailpipes and the time of reaching distant receptors. Finally, although our model predicted that carpet PAH levels would diminish across zones of urbanization, the carpet PAH levels actually peaked at the center of the “zones” (Beyea et al. 2006). The latter finding is consistent with a study showing that residential ambient PAH concentrations do not correlate with house dust PAH levels (Fromme et al. 2004).

The model was calibrated against soil and PAH–DNA adduct data through chi-squared minimization (Beyea et al. 2006). The soil-calibrated model provided the best fit to field data and was therefore used for regressions against breast cancer incidence. Emissions during engine warm-up, which were included during model building, did not contribute to predicting soil PAH levels in validation exercises and were dropped from the exposure model (Beyea et al. 2006).

Missing exposure data. Residential histories during 1960–1995 were incomplete for study participants who migrated to Long Island from other locations or whose recollection of prior addresses was incomplete (Beyea et al. 2013). We estimated emissions during these time periods by imputing values for the dispersion or transfer of emissions from the entire road network to exposure at individual residences, referred to as the D-value. D-values tend to be roughly constant over historical time, changing only as the relative traffic pattern changes in different parts of the modeling region.

For time spent outside of the study area, we used a random variable with a lognormal distribution whose mean was the average estimated traffic B[a]P concentration on Long Island during the relevant period, based on 5-year intervals. We used multiple imputation (MI) to derive the variance of the random D-value, which was set equal to the variance of D-values for women in the study area during the same 5-year interval used to compute the mean (Beyea et al. 2013Rubin 1996).

When the specific location of a residence within the Long Island study area was not known, the D-value was imputed by interpolating between values at residences before and after the missing value (Beyea et al. 2013), as suggested by Raaschou-Nielsen et al. (2011). To obtain values that differed between imputed data sets, we multiplied the interpolated D-value by a random number with a log normal distribution whose variance was taken from a lognormal fit to the two D-values used for interpolation. If the missing D-value was the first or last D-value for a study participant, extrapolation was used. For each of 30 imputed data sets, distinct values were randomly drawn from the derived lognormal distributions used to pick imputed D-values.

Statistical methods. We evaluated cumulative vehicular traffic B[a]P exposures for the year 1995 (the year prior to case ascertainment) and for the period 1960–1990. For 1995 exposures, we conducted a complete case analysis (CCA), in which all participants had complete, unimputed exposure information. For 1960–1990 exposures, we restricted analyses to women with ≤ 20% of their total cumulative exposure imputed (Beyea et al. 2013). We also conducted a sensitivity analysis restricting allowed imputation percentage by exposure duration rather than percentage of cumulative exposure level, as well as conducting a CCA for associations with 1960–1990 exposure. We selected a range of exposure durations in order to maximize study power, which was higher for recent exposures, in addition to benefiting from long-term cumulative exposure information. We also removed the contribution of intersections from the exposure model and imputed missing exposures according to census place (i.e., city, town, or village) (Beyea et al. 2013). Emissions at intersections contribute strongly to total traffic PAH exposure because of the increased acceleration/deceleration that takes place in these locations (Beyea et al. 2006).

We calculated descriptive statistics for the exposure variables, overall and by case–control status, and evaluated Spearman and Pearson correlations (Rothman et al. 2012) between selected exposure variables. Pearson correlation is more sensitive to outliers and the upper tails of a distribution than Spearman correlation. “Outlier” exposure estimates in our study reflected truly increased exposures for these individuals owing to proximity to heavily trafficked intersections (Beyea et al. 20062013). Thus, Pearson coefficients may be informative when considering women with the highest exposure levels, but Spearman coefficients are likely to be more representative of the overall ranking for most participants.

Exposure levels were normalized to the average B[a]P exposure in 1995 and expressed as relative units (Beyea et al. 2013) in order to avoid interpreting results as stemming from specific B[a]P exposure levels; rather, B[a]P is to be considered a proxy for all traffic PAHs.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Prior to undertaking regression analyses, we used age-adjusted cubic smoothing splines with knots at each unique exposure value (Hastie and Tibshirani 1990) to evaluate the association between traffic-related B[a]P exposure (during 1995 and 1960–1990) and breast cancer incidence. The spline figures for both short- and long-term exposures indicated that the association was not linear (data not shown) and were used to generate traffic B[a]P quantile cut points for regression models: < 50th (referent), 50th to < 75th, 75th to 95th, and ≥ 95th percentiles. We are precluded from showing these figures because of stipulations in the LIBCSP’s consent forms and IRB approval regarding presenting results for individual women or groups comprising fewer than five participants because the figures would single out women with high traffic PAH exposure levels.

We used unconditional logistic regression (Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989) to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between traffic B[a]P estimates and breast cancer incidence. When using partially imputed exposure variables, effect estimates and confidence limits were combined across 30 imputations using Rubin’s rules (Rubin 1996).

All regression models were adjusted for the case–control frequency-matching factor, 5-year age group (Gammon et al. 2002a). Other potential confounders [educational level (less than high school, high school graduate, some college, college graduate, or post-college), annual household income (< $15,000, $15,000–$19,999, $20,000–$24,999, $25,000–$34,999, $35,000–$49,999, $50,000–$69,999, $70,000–$89,999, or ≥ $90,000), race (white, black, or other), religion (none, Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, or other), parity (continuous), age at first birth (continuous), body mass index (kilograms per meter squared, continuous) duration of oral contraceptive use (continuous), lifetime average alcohol intake (never drinkers, < 15 g/day, 15–30 g/day, ≥ 30 g/day), lifetime average physical activity (in hours per week: none, low, average, and high), and duration of breastfeeding (continuous)] were identified by a thorough literature review and analysis of directed acyclic graphs (Shrier and Platt 2008) and were evaluated for model inclusion using a 10% change-in-estimate criterion relative to age-adjusted models (Rothman et al. 2012). No covariates altered age-adjusted effect estimates for the year 1995 or for the period 1960–1990 by 10% or more. We present the results as age-adjusted models as well as models adjusted for all potential confounders.

We explored effect modification by menopausal status (pre- vs. postmenopausal) and by fruit/vegetable intake in the year prior to the study interview (≤ 34 vs. ≥ 35 servings/week) for 1995 and 1960–1990 exposures using stratified analyses and likelihood ratio tests for multiplicative interaction (Rothman et al. 2012). Menopausal status was defined using data from the study questionnaire, which was collected during the case–control interview (Shantakumar et al. 2007). Specifically, menopausal status was defined according to information on participants’ last menstrual period, history of hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, smoking status, and hormone replacement therapy use (Shantakumar et al. 2007). Fruit/vegetable intake was dichotomized based on previously reported associations with breast cancer incidence in the LIBCSP (Gaudet et al. 2004).

We used age-adjusted polytomous logistic regression models (Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989) to estimate associations between traffic B[a]P and breast cancer, with cases categorized according to tumor TP53 mutation status and hormone receptor status subtypes and by whether tumors presented as invasive or in situ. Polytomous regression simultaneously generates effect estimates for several groups in relation to control participants. The ratios of the odds ratios and 95% CIs (Schlesselman 1982) for these associations were then used to formally evaluate the heterogeneity of the effect estimates across tumor types [TP53 mutation-positive vs. TP53 mutation-negative, in situ vs. invasive, ER+PR+ vs. all other subtypes (ER–/PR+, ER+/PR–, or ER–/PR–), and ER–PR– vs. all other subtypes (ER+/PR–, ER–/PR+, or ER+/PR+)]. The upper exposure quantiles (75th to < 95th and ≥ 95th percentiles) were collapsed when cell sizes comprised fewer than 10 participants.

Results

The number of LIBCSP respondents for whom traffic B[a]P estimates were available (520–1,274 case participants; 566–1,334 control participants) varied according to the exposure definition and the imputed data set (some women exceeded the limit on imputation percentage in certain imputation draws), and the participants showed a wide range of exposure levels (Table 1). Mean estimated exposures were consistently higher among case particpants than control participants (Table 1). In the year 1995, mean exposures were 1.03 and 0.97 units for participants in the case and control groups, respectively. The corresponding mean levels for cumulative exposure in 1960–1990 were 227.42 and 196.71 units, where each unit corresponds to one year’s worth of average exposure in 1995.

Table 1 - See HTML for full tableTable 1 – Residential vehicular traffic benzo[a]pyrene exposure estimates by case–control status, Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, 1996–1997.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

Short-term (1995) and long-term [1960–1990 (20% MI)] exposure estimates were correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient: r = 0.76, Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.41; see Supplemental Material, Table S2).

Adjusted cubic spline figures suggested an increase in breast cancer incidence among women with the top 1% of traffic B[a]P exposure levels in 1995 and in 1960–1990 (data not shown). These results are based on a small number of women. Hence, we used broader quantiles (≥ 95th percentile, 75th to < 95th percentile, 50th to < 75th percentile, < 50th percentile) in regression models for 1995 and 1960–1990 in order to stabilize the results, which are presented in Table 2. Age-adjusted ORs from logistic regression models comparing participants with the top 5% of exposure levels to those with exposures below the median were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.64) for 1995 exposure (complete case analysis), and 1.44 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.68) for cumulative exposure during 1960–1990 (among women with ≤ 20% of their total exposure based on imputed values) (Table 2). Effect estimates were similar when adjusting for the full set of potential confounders, especially for the 1960–1990 results (Table 2). Restricting participants’ imputation percentage by exposure duration rather than by percentage of cumulative exposure level did not alter results for the association between 1960–1990 traffic PAHs and incident breast cancer (data not shown). Associations for 1960–1990 (CCA) were also similar to the results for 1960–1990 with 20% MI (data not shown). After removing the contribution of intersections from the exposure model, we observed null associations between traffic PAH exposure and breast cancer risk (even among women with the highest exposures) which is consistent with a previous LIBCSP report indicating the importance of intersection emissions to total exposure (Beyea et al. 2006). However, interactions with fruit/vegetable intake were still evident (data not shown).

Table 2 - See HTML for full tableTable 2 – Associations between varying time ranges of exposure to benzo[a]pyrene from residential vehicular traffic and breast cancer incidence, Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, 1996–1997.

View Table (HTML Version) 

View larger image (TIF File) 

The traffic B[a]P-breast cancer association was positive among women with low fruit/vegetable intake (Table 3), but not among women with high fruit/vegetable intake. For example, among women with low fruit/vegetable intake, we observed elevated ORs for the top 5% of 1995 exposures for this traffic PAH proxy compared with levels below the median (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.89, 2.40, p for trend = 0.04). Among women with high fruit/vegetable intake, the corresponding OR was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.60, p-interaction = 0.01). For 1960–1990 exposure, ORs for the top ≥ 75th percentile of exposure relative to exposures below the median were 1.43 (95% CI: 0.94, 2.16) among those with low fruit/vegetable intake and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.15) among those with high fruit/vegetable intake.

Table 3 - See HTML for full tableTable 3 – Associations between traffic benzo[a]pyrene exposure and breast cancer incidence within strata of fruit/vegetable intake and menopausal status, Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, 1996–1997.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

We observed some weak evidence that traffic B[a]P exposure and breast cancer incidence may be more strongly related among premenopausal women (Table 3). For example, the OR for the association between breast cancer and 1995 traffic B[a]P exposure (≥ 95th percentile vs. below the median) was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.58, 2.47) among premenopausal women, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.63) among postmenopausal women (p-interaction = 0.02). For 1960–1990 exposure, the ORs (≥ 75th percentile vs. below the median) were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.63, 2.71) among premenopausal women and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.29) among postmenopausal women (p-interaction = 0.50).

Traffic B[a]P exposure in 1995 (top 5% vs. below the median) was more strongly associated with ER–/PR– breast tumors (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 0.91, 3.05), rather than ER+/PR+, ER+/PR–, or ER–/PR+ tumors (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.27; ratio of the ORs = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.08, 4.06) (Table 4). ORs for women with exposures in the 50th to < 75th and 75th to < 95th percentile ranges were below the null value. The OR for traffic B[a]P in 1995 (top 5% vs. below the median) and ER+/PR+ breast tumors was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.52, 1.41), versus 1.15 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.94) for ER+/PR–, ER–/PR+, or ER–/PR– tumors (Table 4). Among case women with available traffic PAH exposure estimates, 847 out of 1,274 had information regarding their tumor hormone receptor status.

Table 4 - See HTML for full tableTable 4 – Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between traffic benzo[a]pyrene exposure (1995) and tumor hormone receptor status subtypes (n = 847 case participants), Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, 1996–1997.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

This traffic PAH proxy was also more strongly related to in situ rather than invasive breast cancers when evaluating women within the top quantile of exposure compared with exposures below the median (Table 5). The ratios of the ORs were elevated (1.5 and higher) for both 1995 and 1960–1990 exposures. For example, for 1995 exposure, the ORs for the top quantile of exposure (vs. below the median) were 1.42 (95% CI: 0.99, 2.02) for in situ tumors, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.18) for invasive tumors (ratio of the ORs = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.09).

Table 5 - See HTML for full tableTable 5 – Associations between exposure to traffic-related polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and invasive and in situ breast cancer incidence,a Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, 1996–1997.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

We observed no heterogeneity of the effect estimates for tumor TP53-mutation status subtypes. Specifically, when compared with traffic PAH exposures below the median, effect estimates for exposures in the 50th to < 75th percentile and ≥ 75th percentile vacillated around the null value for both 1995 and 1960–1990 exposures, and the ratios of the ORs did not indicate tumor heterogeneity. For example, for 1960–1990 exposure (≥ 75th percentile vs. < 50th percentile), the observed ORs were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.52, 2.49) for tumor TP53-mutation positive cancer, and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.44) for tumor TP53-mutation negative cancer.

Discussion

We observed a modest positive association between high-level residential exposure to vehicular traffic B[a]P, as a proxy for traffic PAHs, and breast cancer incidence in this population-based study, although estimates were imprecise and varied by the exposure duration examined. The age-adjusted odds ratios for the association were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.80, 16.4) for recent 1995 traffic B[a]P exposure and 1.44 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.68) for long-term (1960–1990) exposure when comparing participants with exposure levels at or above the 95th percentile with participants with exposures under the median. The corresponding odds ratios for the association between recent exposure to this traffic PAH proxy and breast cancer were 1.46 (95% CI: 0.89, 2.40) among women with low fruit/vegetable intake, and 1.67 (95% CI: 0.91, 3.05) among those with hormone receptor–negative breast tumors. U.S. traffic PAH emissions are greatly reduced from the high levels of the 1960s and 1970s, but annual traffic kilometers driven is increasing (Beyea et al. 2008). Our results may have increased public health significance outside the United States, given widespread exposure to traffic pollution throughout the world and delayed introduction of vehicle pollution controls. For instance, tailpipe PAH reductions comparable to those in the United States did not occur in Europe until the late 1990s (Beyea et al. 2008).

Traffic pollution is a major ambient source of indoor and outdoor ambient PAHs (Fromme et al. 2004Nielsen 1996), especially near cities (Boström et al. 2002). Source apportionment studies conducted in urban areas have reported that approximately 40–90% of ambient PAH levels are explained by vehicular traffic emissions, depending on various factors such as degree of urbanization or day of the week (Harrison et al. 1996Nielsen 1996).

Previous studies have consistently reported elevated associations between residential air pollution exposure and breast cancer risk (Bonner et al. 2005Crouse et al. 2010Lewis-Michl et al. 1996Nie et al. 2007Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011). For example, a breast cancer study conducted in Buffalo, New York, reported elevated odds ratios when comparing the highest and lowest quartiles of overall and traffic-related particulate pollution exposure in an area with high industrial emissions [OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 0.97, 6.09 for exposure at birth, or OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.16, 5.69 for exposure at the time of a woman’s first birth (Bonner et al. 2005Nie et al. 2007)]. The latter study, by Nie et al. (2007), used an adapted version of the model developed for the LIBCSP. Other investigators examined continuous traffic-related nitrogen oxide levels, reporting, for example, an elevated OR of 1.31 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.71) for each 5-ppb increase in nitrogen dioxide (Crouse et al. 2010), or an OR of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.51) for each 100-μg/m3 increase in nitrogen oxides (Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011). Finally, a study reported an elevated association between high residential traffic density in Nassau County but not Suffolk County in Long Island, NY [pollution levels are higher in Nassau County (Lewis-Michl et al. 1996)]. The study by Lewis-Michl et al. (1996) was conducted in the same two counties as our investigation.

Some previous studies estimated exposure to air pollution, a complex mixture, using relatively sparse monitors (Bonner et al. 2005), simple traffic density data (Lewis-Michl et al. 1996), or reconstructed exposure to nitrogen oxides rather than carcinogenic particulate pollution (Crouse et al. 2010Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011). Two studies compared their exposure estimates against measured, related proxies (Nie et al. 2007Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2011). Most studies evaluated relatively brief periods of exposure. Overall, based on an informal qualitative assessment, positive results were reported across studies despite differences in exposure assessment, exposure levels and timing, study design, and participant characteristics between study populations. When stratifying analyses by menopausal status, study results were inconsistent across investigations, suggesting that timing, magnitude of exposure, and/or pollutant mix may play important roles, although such differences could also be explained by random chance.

Strengths of our study include long-term, individualized traffic B[a]P exposure estimates generated from an exposure model that incorporated information regarding historical tailpipe emissions, local traffic patterns, meteorological conditions, pollutant dispersion, deposition and decay data, proximity to intersections, and background PAHs (Beyea et al. 2006). Participants also had a wide range of estimated exposures due to the gradient of urbanization across the study area (Beyea et al. 2006). In addition, the LIBCSP is a large, population-based study with detailed information regarding many covariates, which facilitates controlling for confounders, assessing effect modification, and evaluating heterogeneity within breast cancer subtypes (Gammon et al. 2002a).

We estimated stronger associations between traffic B[a]P exposure and breast cancer incidence among women with low fruit/vegetable intake, consistent with a previous LIBCSP report that found that associations with grilled/smoked meat intake—another PAH source—were more pronounced among participants who consumed low levels of fruits/vegetables (Steck et al. 2007). Similarly, fruit/vegetable intake was negatively associated with PAH–DNA adduct levels measured in peripheral leukocytes, both in the LIBCSP (Shantakumar et al. 2005) and in an epidemiologic study conducted in Europe (Palli et al. 2000). Components of fruits and vegetables have antioxidant and other chemopreventive properties and decrease carcinogenic effects of PAHs in animals (Hecht 2000Jin et al. 2006). To our knowledge, ours is the first population-based breast cancer study to evaluate interactions between air pollution and fruit and vegetable intake; thus, our results require confirmation. We also observed inverse associations between traffic and breast cancer in the high fruit/vegetable intake group, which is consistent with previous research showing that PAH-related tumor induction is reduced by high antioxidant intake (Hecht et al. 2002), but may also be due to chance.

Traffic B[a]P–breast cancer associations appeared to be stronger among premenopausal women in our study, although the greatest difference was noted within the 75th to 95th percentile traffic exposure subgroup, rather than within the top 5%, and we also saw some unexpected negative associations between traffic exposure and breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Stronger associations with premenopausal rather than postmenopausal breast cancer were observed in previous LIBCSP reports regarding combined active/passive smoking exposure (Gammon et al. 2004) and PAH–DNA adducts (Gammon et al. 2002b). Similarly, a recent systematic review concluded that associations between environmental tobacco smoke and premenopausal, but not postmenopausal, breast cancer were “consistent with causality” (Johnson et al. 2011). We also found stronger associations with traffic B[a]P among women with ER–/PR– breast tumors, which are overrepresented among premenopausal women (Chen and Colditz 2007), although this finding was based on a small number of cases. Previous studies conducted in an area with high industrial emissions reported positive associations between air pollution and both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer that varied according to the exposure definition used; the associations in these studies did not vary by tumor hormone-receptor subtype (Bonner et al. 2005Nie et al. 2007).

Associations between traffic B[a]P and breast cancer were stronger among women with in situ rather than invasive breast tumors when evaluating women within the top quantile of exposure (vs. below the median). A possible explanation for these findings is that PAHs may act earlier in the carcinogenic process (Millikan et al. 1995), similar to the way in which smoking may sometimes be more strongly related to colorectal adenomas, rather than to invasive colorectal cancer (Terry and Neugut 1998). Other possible explanations are the influence of potential diagnostic bias in identifying in situ breast tumors, or random chance. The sample size was much smaller in the subgroup of participants with in situ breast cancer than in the subgroup of participants with invasive breast cancer; thus, the results among the in situ group are more unstable. In addition, we were unable to evaluate regressions for participants with the top 5% of exposures when evaluating in situ breast cancer owing to sample size constraints. Instead, we evaluated broader quantiles of exposure (< 50th, 50th to < 75th, ≥ 75th percentiles), which may have obscured some patterns of association. Associations between traffic B[a]P and invasive breast cancer were positive, though imprecise, among those with the top 5% of exposure levels, compared with below the median (1995: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.66; 1960–1990: OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.71, 2.56).

Traffic B[a]P was not related to tumor TP53-mutation status in our study, although the number of case women with TP53-mutation–positive tumor tissue and high traffic exposure estimates was low. This null result was consistent with an LIBCSP report evaluating active and passive smoking, grilled/smoked meat intake, and PAH–DNA adducts (Mordukhovich et al. 2010). Active, but not passive, smoking was associated with TP53-mutation positive breast cancer in a smaller population study (Conway et al. 2002).

Several mechanisms potentially underlie the observed association between traffic-related B[a]P, as a proxy for overall particulate vehicular traffic PAH exposure, and breast cancer incidence. PAHs are genotoxic, damaging DNA primarily through the formation of PAH–DNA adducts; they may also induce inflammation and oxidative stress, resulting in oxidative DNA lesions (IARC 2010). Uncorrected DNA damage can cause somatic mutations in tumor suppressor genes or proto-oncogenes, which could in turn contribute to carcinogenesis (Gammon and Santella 2008IARC 2010).

Limitations of our study include some missing address information, which was corrected in part through multiple imputation. Our results were robust to varying the percentage of imputation allowed, increasing confidence that our imputation method does not introduce artificial results (Beyea et al. 2013). Similarly, although analyses for exposure in 1960–1990 included roughly half of the study participants and may not be representative of the full study population (Gammon et al. 2002a), only evaluating 1 recent year of exposure also carries implicit assumptions and associated biases related to missing exposures.

An additional limitation of our study is that the exposure model did not generate non-residential traffic PAH exposure estimates. A nationwide study reported that, on average, American men and women spend almost 70% of their day inside (64.97%) or just outside (2.50%) of their residences, both throughout the United States and in one large city (Chicago, IL) (Leech et al. 2002). A Canadian study found similar results among women only (Nethery et al. 2009). Our results were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, although we used a targeted approach and carefully selected factors that were likely to interact with traffic PAHs. Our results may also be influenced by potential selection bias, given that our response rates among the control participants were lower than anticipated (Gammon et al. 2002a). The hormone receptor subtype results may be subject to selection bias as well, given that only a subset of case participants (847 out of 1,274) were available for these analyses. However, responses among the control participants are comparable to those among other large population-based case–control studies conducted in the 1990s (Newman et al. 1995).

The purpose of our exposure model was to estimate vehicular traffic PAH exposures; thus, by design, we did not incorporate information on non-traffic sources of ambient PAHs, such as environmental tobacco smoke, cooking, or heating (Beyea et al. 2013). Traffic is often the largest source of ambient PAHs near urban areas (Fromme et al. 2004Nielsen 1996) and generates smaller, more inflammatory particles than some other ambient sources (Kocbach et al. 2006).

B[a]P was modeled as a surrogate for all traffic PAHs. Traffic pollution contains many chemicals, including many PAHs and other confirmed carcinogens (Boström et al. 2002). It is impossible to ascribe health effects to a single traffic pollutant based on an observational study. However, B[a]P is one of the most carcinogenic PAHs and is representative of overall PAH exposure from vehicle exhaust (Boström et al. 2002), and particulate PAHs are among the most carcinogenic components of traffic exhaust (Boothe and Shendell 2008). Studies conducted throughout the United States indicate that historical traffic-related B[a]P emissions closely track emissions for all other measured traffic-related PAHs (Beyea et al. 2008). Furthermore, many types of traffic pollutants have differing distributions (Beyea et al. 2006). In our study, exposures were modeled using PAH-specific emissions data and dispersion parameters and were validated and calibrated against soil PAH levels (Beyea et al. 2006). Although studies of air pollution exposure and traffic pollution have been conducted in the United States, Canada, and Europe, where traffic emission levels are currently fairly low, future studies should examine associations between traffic exposure and breast cancer within more highly exposed populations.

Conclusions

We observed modest positive associations between breast cancer incidence and comparatively high levels of residential traffic B[a]P, particularly among women with low fruit and vegetable intake and hormone receptor–negative tumors, although the effect estimates were imprecise and several exposure durations and participant subgroups were evaluated. Future studies should examine associations between breast cancer and traffic PAH exposure at different points across the life-course and in combination with other PAH sources, and should evaluate interactions between traffic PAHs and genetic variants in relevant pathways. Our results strengthen the plausibility of a relationship between vehicular traffic PAHs and breast cancer incidence and provide new data on potentially susceptible subgroups of women.


References

ACS (American Cancer Society). 2011. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta, GA:American Cancer Society Inc. Available: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content​/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/docu​ment/acspc-029771.pdf [accessed 3 December 2011].

Beyea J, Hatch M, Stellman SD, Santella RM, Teitelbaum SL, Prokopczyk B, et al. 2006. Validation and calibration of a model used to reconstruct historical exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for use in epidemiologic studies. Environ Health Perspect 114:1053–1058; doi: 10.1289/ehp.8659.

Beyea J, Hatch M, Stellman SD, Teitelbaum SL, Gammon MD. 2005. Development of a Traffic Model for Predicting Airborne PAH Exposures since 1960 on Long Island, New York. Lambertville, NJ:CiPI. Available: http://www.cipi.com/PDF/beyea2005traffic​pahmodel.pdf [accessed 7 June 2011].

Beyea J, Stellman SD, Hatch M, Gammon MD. 2008. Airborne emissions from 1961 to 2004 of benzo[a]pyrene from U.S. vehicles per km of travel based on tunnel studies. Environ Sci Technol 42:7315–7320.

Beyea J, Stellman SD, Teitelbaum SL, Mordukhovich I, Gammon MD. 2013. Imputation method for lifetime exposure assessment in air pollution epidemiologic studies. Environ Health 12(1):62; doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-62.

Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. 1986. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 124:453–469.

Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C. 1990. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1327–1335.

Bonner MR, Han D, Nie J, Rogerson P, Vena JE, Muti P, et al. 2005. Breast cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended particulates as a proxy measure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:53–60.

Boothe VL, Shendell DG. 2008. Potential health effects associated with residential proximity to freeways and primary roads: review of scientific literature, 1999–2006. J Environ Health 70(8):33–41.

Boström CE, Gerde P, Hanberg A, Jernström B, Johansson C, Kyrklund T. 2002. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 3):451–488.

Chen WY, Colditz GA. 2007. Risk factors and hormone-receptor status: epidemiology, risk-prediction models and treatment implications for breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(7):415–423.

Chock DP. 1978. A simple line-source model for dispersion near roadways. Atmos Environ 12:823–829.

Conway K, Edmiston SN, Cui L, Drouin SS, Pang J, He M, et al. 2002. Prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations associated with smoking in breast cancer. Cancer Res 62(7):1987–1995.

Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, Labrèche F. 2010. Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Montreal, Canada: a case–control study. Environ Health Perspect 118:1578–1583; doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002221.

Eng SM, Gammon MD, Terry MB, Kushi LH, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, et al. 2005. Body size changes in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer among women on Long Island, New York. Am J Epidemiol 162(3):229–237.

Fink BN, Steck SE, Wolff MS, Britton JA, Kabat GC, Schroeder JC, et al. 2007. Dietary flavonoid intake and breast cancer risk among women on Long Island. Am J Epidemiol 165(5):514–523.

Fromme H, Lahrz T, Piloty M, Gebhardt H, Oddoy A, Rüden H. 2004. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons inside and outside of apartments in an urban area. Sci Total Environ 326:143–149.

Gammon MD, Eng SM, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Kabat GC, Hatch M, et al. 2004. Environmental tobacco smoke and breast cancer incidence. Environ Res 96(2):176–185.

Gammon MD, Neugut AI, Santella RM, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Terry MB, et al. 2002a. The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: description of a multi-institutional collaboration to identify environmental risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 74(3):235–254.

Gammon MD, Santella RM. 2008. PAH, genetic susceptibility and breast cancer risk: an update from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. Eur J Cancer 44:636–640.

Gammon MD, Santella RM, Neugut AI, Eng SM, Teitelbaum SL, Paykin A, et al. 2002b. Environmental toxins and breast cancer on Long Island. I. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon DNA adducts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:677–685.

Gaudet MM, Britton JA, Kabat GC, Steck-Scott S, Eng SM, Teitelbaum SL, et al. 2004. Fruits, vegetables, and micronutrients in relation to breast cancer modified by menopause and hormone receptor status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(9):1485–1494.

Harrison RM, Smith DJT, Luhana L. 1996. Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK. Environ Sci Technol 30:825–832.

Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. London:Chapman & Hall.

Hecht SS. 2000. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by isothiocyanates. Drug Metab Rev 32(3–4):395–411.

Hecht SS, Kenney PM, Wang M, Upadhyaya P. 2002. Benzyl isothiocyanate: an effective inhibitor of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon tumorigenesis in A/J mouse lung. Cancer Lett 187(1–2):87–94.

Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York:John Wiley & Sons.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2010. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum 92.

Jin NZ, Zhu YP, Zhou JW, Mao L, Zhao RC, Fang TH, et al. 2006. Preventive effects of quercetin against benzo[a]pyrene-induced DNA damages and pulmonary precancerous pathologic changes in mice. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 98(6):593–598.

Johnson KC, Miller AB, Collishaw NE, Palmer JR, Hammond SK, Salmon AG, et al. 2011. Active smoking and secondhand smoke increase breast cancer risk: the report of the Canadian Expert Panel on Tobacco Smoke and Breast Cancer Risk (2009). Tob Control 20(1):e2; doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.035931.

Kocbach A, Li Y, Yttri KE, Cassee FR, Schwarze PE, Namork E. 2006. Physicochemical characterisation of combustion particles from vehicle exhaust and residential wood smoke. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:1; doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-1.

Leech JA, Nelson WC, Burnett RT, Aaron S, Raizenne ME. 2002. It’s about time: a comparison of Canadian and American time-activity patterns. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 12(6):427–432.

Lewis-Michl EL, Melius JM, Kallenbach LR, Ju CL, Talbot TO, Orr MF, et al. 1996. Breast cancer risk and residence near industry or traffic in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island, New York. Arch Environ Health 51(4):255–265.

McCullough LE, Eng SM, Bradshaw PT, Cleveland RJ, Teitelbaum SL, Neugut AI, et al. 2012. Fat or fit: the joint effects of physical activity, weight gain, and body size on breast cancer risk. Cancer 118(19):4860–4868.

Millikan R, Dressler L, Geradts J, Graham M. 1995. The need for epidemiologic studies of in-situ carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(1):65–77.

Mordukhovich I, Rossner P Jr, Terry MB, Santella R, Zhang YJ, Hibshoosh H, et al. 2010. Associations between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-related exposures and p53 mutations in breast tumors. Environ Health Perspect 118:511–518; doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901233.

Nethery E, Brauer M, Janssen P. 2009. Time–activity patterns of pregnant women and changes during the course of pregnancy. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19(3):317–324.

Newman B, Moorman PG, Millikan R, Qaqish BF, Geradts J, Aldrich TE, et al. 1995. The Carolina Breast Cancer Study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(1):51–60.

Nie J, Beyea J, Bonner MR, Han D, Vena J, Rogerson P, et al. 2007. Exposure to traffic emissions throughout life and risk of breast cancer: the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study. Cancer Causes Control 18:947–955.

Nielsen T. 1996. Traffic contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the center of a large city. Atmos Environ 30:3481–3490.

Palli D, Vineis P, Russo A, Berrino F, Krogh V, Masala G, et al. 2000. Diet, metabolic polymorphisms and DNA adducts: the EPIC-Italy cross-sectional study. Int J Cancer 87(3):444–451.

Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Hvidberg M, Jensen SS, Ketzel M, Sørensen M, et al. 2011. Air pollution from traffic and cancer incidence: a Danish cohort study. Environ Health 10:67; doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-67.

Rossner P Jr, Gammon MD, Zhang YJ, Terry MB, Hibshoosh H, Memeo L, et al. 2009. Mutations in p53, p53 protein overexpression, and breast cancer survival. J Cell Mol Med 13(9B):3847–3857.

Rothman KJ, Lash TL, Greenland S. 2012. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Rubin DB. 1996. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 91:473–489.

Rundle A, Tang D, Hibshoosh H, Estabrook A, Schnabel F, Cao W, et al. 2000. The relationship between genetic damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in breast tissue and breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 21:1281–1289.

Schlesselman JJ. 1982. Case–control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York:Oxford University Press.

Shantakumar S, Gammon MD, Eng SM, Sagiv SK, Gaudet MM, Teitelbaum SL, et al. 2005. Residential environmental exposures and other characteristics associated with detectable PAH–DNA adducts in peripheral mononuclear cells in a population-based sample of adult females. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 15:482–490.

Shantakumar S, Terry MB, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Millikan RC, Moorman PG, et al. 2007. Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk among older women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102(3):365–374.

Shrier I, Platt RW. 2008. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:70; doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-70.

Steck SE, Gaudet MM, Eng SM, Britton JA, Teitelbaum SL, Neugut AI, et al. 2007. Cooked meat and risk of breast cancer—lifetime versus recent dietary intake. Epidemiology 18:373–382.

Terry MB, Neugut AI. 1998. Cigarette smoking and the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence: a hypothesis to explain the paradox. Am J Epidemiol 147(10):903–910.

Viegele WJ, Head JH. 1978. Derivation of the Gaussian plume model. JAPCA 28:1139–1141.

Waksberg J. 1978. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc 73:40–46.

Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL, Couch FJ, Nevanlinna H, Milne RL, et al. 2011. Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(3):250–263.

Yasui Y, Potter JD. 1999. The shape of age-incidence curves of female breast cancer by hormone-receptor status. Cancer Causes Control 10(5):431–437.


WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien