Skip to content
EHP Banner Ad

Environmental Health Perspectives

Facebook Page EHP Twitter Feed Open Access icon  

Review April 2016 | Volume 124 | Issue 4

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1409294

Occupation and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Its Subtypes: A Pooled Analysis from the InterLymph Consortium

Andrea ‘t Mannetje,1* Anneclaire J. De Roos,2* Paolo Boffetta,3 Roel Vermeulen,4 Geza Benke,5 Lin Fritschi,6 Paul Brennan,7 Lenka Foretova,8 Marc Maynadié,9 Nikolaus Becker,10 Alexandra Nieters,11 Anthony Staines,12 Marcello Campagna,13 Brian Chiu,14 Jacqueline Clavel,15,16 Silvia de Sanjose,17,18 Patricia Hartge,19 Elizabeth A. Holly,20 Paige Bracci,20 Martha S. Linet,21 Alain Monnereau,22,23 Laurent Orsi,15 Mark P. Purdue,24 Nathaniel Rothman,24 Qing Lan,24 Eleanor Kane,25 Adele Seniori Costantini,26 Lucia Miligi,26 John J. Spinelli,27 Tongzhang Zheng,28 Pierluigi Cocco,13* and Anne Kricker29*

Author Affiliations open
1Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand; 2Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 3Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; 4Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 5Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 6School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia; 7International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; 8Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; 9Biological Hematology Unit, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France; 10Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 11Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 12School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland; 13Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 14Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA; 15Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Villejuif, France; 16French National Registry of Childhood Hematological Malignancies (NRCH), Villejuif, France; 17Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology–Spain Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain; 18CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; 19Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 20Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; 21Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 22Centre d’investigation clinique (CIC), INSERM, Bordeaux, France; 23Registre des Hémopathies Malignes de la Gironde, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; 24Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 25Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdon; 26Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy; 27Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 28Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; 29Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

PDF icon PDF Version (210 KB)

  • Background: Various occupations have been associated with an elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but results have been inconsistent across studies.

    Objectives: We investigated occupational risk of NHL and of four common NHL subtypes with particular focus on occupations of a priori interest.

    Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of 10,046 cases and 12,025 controls from 10 NHL studies participating in the InterLymph Consortium. We harmonized the occupational coding using the 1968 International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-1968) and grouped occupations previously associated with NHL into 25 a priori groups. Odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for center, age, and sex were determined for NHL overall and for the following four subtypes: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).

    Results: We confirmed previously reported positive associations between NHL and farming occupations [field crop/vegetable farm workers OR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 1.51; general farm workers OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.37]; we also confirmed associations of NHL with specific occupations such as women’s hairdressers (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.74), charworkers/cleaners (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36), spray-painters (OR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.29), electrical wiremen (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.54), and carpenters (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.93). We observed subtype-specific associations for DLBCL and CLL/SLL in women’s hairdressers and for DLBCL and PTCL in textile workers.

    Conclusions: Our pooled analysis of 10 international studies adds to evidence suggesting that farming, hairdressing, and textile industry–related exposures may contribute to NHL risk. Associations with women’s hairdresser and textile occupations may be specific for certain NHL subtypes.

  • Citation: ‘t Mannetje A, De Roos AJ, Boffetta P, Vermeulen R, Benke G, Fritschi L, Brennan P, Foretova L, Maynadié M, Becker N, Nieters A, Staines A, Campagna M, Chiu B, Clavel J, de Sanjose S, Hartge P, Holly EA, Bracci P, Linet MS, Monnereau A, Orsi L, Purdue MP, Rothman N, Lan Q, Kane E, Seniori Costantini A, Miligi L, Spinelli JJ, Zheng T, Cocco P, Kricker A. 2016. Occupation and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and its subtypes: a pooled analysis from the InterLymph Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 124:396–405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409294

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Address correspondence to A.‘t Mannetje, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington Campus, Private Box 756, Wellington, New Zealand. Telephone: 64 4 801 5799 ext. 62424. E-mail: a.mannetje@massey.ac.nz

    This pooled analysis was funded by an NIH R03 grant for cancer epidemiology (PAR-04-159). Support to P.C. was provided by the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (PRIN 2007 prot. 2007WEJLZB, PRIN 2009 prot. 20092ZELR2) and by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, investigator grant 11855).

    The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

    Received: 2 October 2014
    Accepted: 2 September 2015
    Advance Publication: 4 September 2015
    Final Publication: 1 April 2016

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Introduction

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) comprises a group of malignancies that are common in industrialized countries. Studies of occupational risk factors have proven valuable for generating hypotheses regarding the possible environmental causes of NHL, and over the past four decades, these studies have produced a number of strong leads (Schottenfeld and Fraumeni 2006). In particular, occupations involving exposure to pesticides and solvents have been repeatedly associated with NHL. Other occupational risk factors have been hypothesized; these include infectious agents, sunlight, organic dusts (including flour dust, textile dust, and wood dust), mineral dusts, metals, and ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, even repeatedly observed associations (e.g., employment as farmer) have not been entirely consistent across studies. A well-defined set of occupations and potential exposures relevant to NHL etiology has yet to be established.

Among the potential reasons for the lack of consistency in previous findings is the idea that individual case–control studies lack the power to provide stable estimates of relative risk for less-common occupations and are susceptible to chance findings because of the large number of occupations evaluated. Studies differ somewhat in how occupational details are recorded, coded, analyzed, and reported, making comparison difficult, and they may not be comparable in terms of the NHL subtypes included and tumor classifications used. Finally, there may be true differences in risk associated with the same occupation across different study regions owing to local differences in population characteristics, exposure patterns, and NHL subtype distribution.

To determine the extent of agreement with previous findings in the large pooled dataset of InterLymph consortium studies, we conducted an analysis of occupations in relation to NHL using a uniform classification of occupations and NHL pathology. Our aims were a) to confirm the relationship of occupations of a priori interest to NHL and its subtypes, and b) to estimate the contribution of specific occupations of a priori interest to the incidence of NHL and its subtypes.

Methods

Study population. Included in our analyses were 10 NHL case–control studies that participate in the InterLymph consortium, had collected information on occupation from cases and controls, and were willing to contribute their data to the pooled analysis (see Table 1 for the acronyms used to refer to each study, details about study designs and locations, and citations to general references for each study). The InterLymph consortium of international investigators undertakes research projects to pool data across studies that explore the etiology of lymphoid malignancies. The set of harmonized core variables, including age, sex, study center (region), smoking status, and NHL subtype, was directly obtained from the InterLymph data coordinating center. Variables on occupational history were obtained from the principal investigators of each participating study. We applied the lymphoma classification scheme for epidemiologic research developed by InterLymph investigators (Morton et al. 2007) to all participating InterLymph studies. All cases classified as “lymphoid neoplasms” according to this classification, except multiple myeloma and Hodgkin lymphoma, were included in this analysis.

Table 1 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 1 – Description of the study population.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

Occupational history. For the purpose of our pooled analyses, the data on occupation were classified into a standard internationally recognized occupational classification scheme, the International Standard Classification of Occupations 1968 (ISCO-68) [International Labour Office (ILO) 1981]. Depending on the original occupational classification used by the individual studies and on whether a full-text description of the occupation was available, the ISCO-68 code for each job recorded was determined by one of the following methods: a) a direct conversion of the original classification to the ISCO-68 classification (for the Yale and UCSF1 studies); b) a direct conversion from the original classification to the ISCO-68 classification followed by checking the correctness of each ISCO-68 code by comparing it with the free-text information on the occupation (for the NCI-SEER study); c) using the free-text information on the occupation to individually assign the ISCO-68 code (for the BC, Nebraska, UK, and NSW studies); or d) directly using the original occupational codes for those studies that used ISCO-68 as their original classification (for the Epilymph, Italy, and ENGELA studies). Eight of the 10 studies collected the full occupational history of cases and controls including all occupations held for at least 1 year and starting and ending years, and 2 studies (Nebraska, BC) recorded only the longest-held occupation.

We defined occupational groups of a priori interest for NHL based on the peer-reviewed literature (Table 2). After discussions among three of the authors (A.’tM., A.J.D., R.V.), 25 occupational groups were constructed that included jobs associated with NHL in previous studies other than the 10 case–control studies included in our pooled analysis.

Table 2 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 2 – Occupational groups of a priori interest.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

We also studied occupations within a group separately up to the detail of the 5-digit ISCO-68 code to explore whether an association was restricted to specific occupations within the group. For example, crop farmers were studied as a group, and specific occupations within this group such as orchard farmers and rice farmers were also studied separately.

Statistical analyses. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between NHL and occupations in the pooled data set in models adjusted for age, sex, and study center. For each a priori occupational group and individual ISCO-68 occupation defined by a 1-digit, 2-digit, 3-digit, and 5-digit code, a dichotomous variable was created for ever having worked in that occupation. Duration of employment was coded as < 1 year, 1–10 years, and > 10 years in the occupation. Smoking status (never/former/current) was considered as a potential confounder, but adjusting for smoking made no substantial difference to the relative risk estimates (data not shown); consequently, smoking was not included as a covariate.

Analyses were performed for all NHL combined (excluding Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma) and separately for each of four major NHL subtypes [diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL)]; the same set of controls that was used for all NHL combined was used for each subtype. Two studies did not include CLL/SLL (UCSF1; UK) and were excluded from all CLL/SLL–specific analyses. All analyses were repeated stratified by sex. All statistical tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. The Nebraska and BC studies included longest-held occupation only and were excluded from analyses of duration but were included in analyses of ever employment because their exclusion made little difference to the results.

Polytomous regression was used to test whether differences in ORs by NHL subtype were statistically significant at p < 0.05; we tested for heterogeneity in effect across the four subtypes (DLBCL, FL, CLL/SLL, PTCL) based on data for ever employment in the occupation with both sexes combined. We tested for heterogeneity among studies using Cochran’s chi-squared test or the Q-test (Higgins and Thompson 2002); there was no evidence of significant heterogeneity (data not shown). To identify those associations with the largest potential impact on NHL incidence under the assumption of causality and in the absence of confounding, we calculated a population attributable fraction (AF) for occupations in which 1% or more of cases had ever worked and that were associated with an increased relative risk. The formula for AF calculation used the prevalence of ever employment in each occupation in controls as an estimate of population prevalence: prevalencecontrols × (OR – 1)/[1 + prevalencecontrols(OR – 1)] (Last et al. 1995).

Criteria for presentation of results. The present analysis involved many specific occupations within the 25 a priori groups for which previous research demonstrated an association with an increased relative risk of NHL: 925 of > 2,000 relevant codes in the ISCO-68 classification were involved in this analysis. We set criteria to determine which associations to include in the results. We present results for ever employment and for > 10 years employment for all NHL and each of the four subtypes for each occupational group of a priori interest regardless of whether the estimates were statistically significant, with the exception of occupational groups with < 10 cases or < 10 controls. One occupational group in the analyses of all NHL (undertakers) and two groups in the analyses of the four subtypes (pulp & paper workers and petroleum workers) were excluded from the results because they had < 10 cases or < 10 controls. Additionally, we report associations with specific occupational titles included within the occupational groups of interest if we estimated a statistically significant OR (> 1.10 or < 0.90, for ever employment or > 10 years employment) based on men and women combined for all NHL or for any one of the four subtypes.

ORs were also calculated for the 1,286 occupations that were not included in the 25 groups of a priori interest. These results are not presented here but are available upon request.

Results

The 10 case–control studies included 10,046 cases and 12,025 controls (Table 1). Of the cases, 50% were from Europe, 43% were from North America, and 7% were from Australia. The year of diagnosis ranged from 1988 to 2004, and 52.4% of cases were male. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age at interview was 57.6 ± 12.8 years for cases and 55.4 ± 14.2 years for controls. The mean year of first employment (in the 8 studies with full occupational history) was 1959 (± 16 years; range, 1915–2003) for cases and 1961 (± 16 years; range, 1912–2002) for controls. Of the four subtypes selected for separate analyses, DLBCL formed the largest group with 3,061 cases (52.4% male), followed by FL (2,140 cases; 45.6% male), CLL/SLL (1,014 cases; 59.3% male), and PTCL (632 cases; 56.5% male).

None of the 24 broad occupational groups of a priori interest (see Table 2) had a statistically significant positive association with NHL for ever employment (Table 3). However, one or more specific titles within 10 of these 24 groups were positively associated with NHL. There were positive associations with ever employment in cleaning occupations for “charworkers, cleaners and related” (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36) and in electrical and electronic occupations for “electrical wiremen” (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.54); there were also positive associations with > 10 years employment for “electrical fitters & related electrical/electronics workers” and selected subgroups of these occupations. Among farming occupations, ever employment as “field crop and vegetable farm workers” (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.51) and as “general farm workers” (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.37) had a positive association with NHL. Employment of > 10 years as a forestry worker was also associated with NHL (OR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.18, 4.32; 28 cases, 14 controls). Other positive associations were observed for NHL for ever employment as a “women’s hairdresser” (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.74), among painters as “spray-painters (except construction)” (OR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.29), among textile workers as “milliners and hatmakers” (OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.28, 4.74), and among woodworker occupations as “general carpenter” (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.93). Furthermore, > 10 years employment was positively associated with NHL among medical workers for “medical doctors” (OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.85; 57 cases, 38 controls) and among metal workers for “machine-tool operators” (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.17; 84 cases; 63 controls). The occupational group of teachers was negatively associated with NHL (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98), as were some of the specific occupations within the teachers group. Only “head teachers” had a positive association with NHL (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.15, 4.06).

Table 3 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 3 – Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for NHL by occupational title in 24 occupational groups.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

Table 4 presents ORs and 95% CIs for the four NHL subtypes for both sexes combined. DLBCL, the most common subtype, had positive associations with the occupational groups of hairdressers (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.00; 58 cases, 158 controls) and textile workers (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.41; 218 cases, 773 controls) as well as with specific occupations within these groups (women’s hairdresser, milliners and hatmakers, and sewers and embroiderers). Positive associations were also observed for specific occupations as “charworkers, cleaners and related workers” (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.58; 122 cases, 395 controls), “field crop & vegetable farm workers” (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.97; 79 cases, 233 controls) and its subgroup “field crop farm worker (general)” (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.17; 38 cases, 118 controls), “metal melters and reheaters” (OR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.01, 5.26; 10 cases, 14 controls), and “special education teachers” (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.71; 14 cases, 24 controls). Forestry workers with > 10 years employment also had a positive association with DLBCL (OR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.34, 6.90; 10 cases, 14 controls).

Table 4 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 4 – Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for each of four NHL subtypes by occupational title in 22 occupational groups.

View Table (HTML Version) 
View larger image (TIF File) 

Positive associations were present for FL with specific occupations such as “spray-painter (except construction)” (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.36, 5.25; 13 cases, 29 controls) and with > 10 years employment as a “medical doctor” (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.26; 13 cases, 38 controls).

CLL/SLL was associated with ever employment in the occupational group of hairdressers (OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.03; 18 cases, 130 controls), both for the specific occupation “women’s hairdresser” as well as for > 10 years employment in the occupational group of hairdressers (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.34; 10 cases, 40 controls). We observed positive associations with CLL/SLL for specific occupations such as “general farm worker” (OR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.84; 102 cases, 399 controls), printing pressmen (OR = 6.52; 95% CI: 2.79, 15.21; 10 cases, 19 controls), “pre-primary education teachers” (OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.87; 11 cases, 111 controls) and carpenters (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.08, 4.09; 13 cases, 69 controls). CLL/SLL was also associated with > 10 years employment as machine tool operators (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.69; 15 cases, 46 controls).

Three occupational groups had positive associations with PTCL: ever employment as painters (OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.84; 22 cases, 221 controls), textile workers (OR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.17; 56 cases, 773 controls), and wood workers (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.27; 31 cases, 352 controls); the last two occupational groups also had increased ORs for > 10 years employment. Specific textile occupations associated with PTCL included “spinners, weavers, knitters, dyers and related workers” (OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.83; 27 cases, 313 controls) and “tailors, dressmakers, sewers, upholsterers and related workers” (> 10 year OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.38, 3.77, 19 cases, 183 controls). The specific wood worker occupation associated with PTCL was “cabinet makers” (OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.22, 4.74; 10 cases, 81 controls). PTCL was also associated with “electrical fitters” (ever employed OR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.97; 10 cases, 92 controls).

Evidence of heterogeneity in relative risks (p < 0.05, Q-test for heterogeneity) across the four NHL subtypes was present for “women’s hairdressers,” metal workers, “printing pressmen,” textile workers, and “cabinetmakers” (Table 4). “Printing pressmen,” however, had very small numbers of cases and controls (< 10) for all analyses except for CLL/SLL.

Attributable fraction. We estimated the proportion of NHL and of each subtype that was attributable to the main occupational groups (farmers, textile workers, hairdressers, wood workers, painters) or to specific occupations (e.g., “women’s hairdressers,” “spray-painters”) for which an elevated relative risk had been observed (p < 0.05). AFs for NHL were low, between 0.3% for “women’s hairdressers” and 0.63% for “general farm workers,” and were somewhat higher for the rarer individual subtypes: 1.49% for “women’s hairdressers” and CLL/SLL and ≥ 3.69% for the textile worker group and PTCL. AFs differed by sex in a number of occupations, reflecting the scarcity of men or women in a particular occupation.

Discussion

We found evidence that NHL was associated with employment as textile workers, hairdressers, and farm workers, as well as with employment as painters, printers, wood workers, metal workers, medical workers, electrical workers, and cleaners. The statistically significant heterogeneity in relative risk estimates among subtypes suggested that employment as “women’s hairdressers” was particularly associated with DLBCL and CLL/SLL and employment as textile workers with DLBCL and PTCL.

Our pooled analysis used a uniform classification of NHL diagnosis and was substantially larger than any individual study. A limitation of our study is that grouping workers according to job title disregards the wide qualitative and quantitative variation in exposure that may occur for workers with the same job title (McGuire et al. 1998). Even if an association between job title and disease is found, the potentially causative agents are unknown, although they are likely to be common rather than rare exposures within the occupational group. The international nature of this study also implies that only associations for occupations with internationally comparable exposure profiles can be detected and that some misclassification will be introduced owing to the recoding of different occupational classifications into a single one. An advantage of using job titles rather than specific exposures is that recall by participants is less likely to be influenced by their disease status, making differential misclassification also less likely. The multiple comparisons of a job title–based approach, however, suggest a vulnerability to false positive findings. Results are therefore focused on the a priori–selected occupational groups (24 were eligible) extracted from earlier NHL research. We discuss below the findings from our study that are consistent with previously reported associations, and we also discuss occupational exposures that might be implicated as etiologic agents.

We confirmed the previously reported association of NHL with crop farming occupations (Blair et al. 1992Keller-Byrne et al. 1997), but not with animal farming (Amadori et al. 1995Boffetta and de Vocht 2007Lee et al. 2002), which was negatively associated with CLL/SLL. This finding suggests that risk estimates for all farming and all NHL combined may be uninformative and that future studies will need to consider both NHL subtype and farming type to identify the possible specific farming exposures that may be involved in these associations.

The observed associations for hairdressers were stronger for women’s hairdressers than for other job titles within this occupational category, supporting a hypothesis of hair dye or other hair treatments more commonly used by women than by men or children as possible causes. Associations were present for DLBCL and CLL/SLL but were absent for FL. A previous pooled analysis of InterLymph studies reported associations with personal hair dye use for NHL subtypes FL and CLL/SLL (Zhang et al. 2008). Exposure from personal hair dye use is, however, not strictly comparable to the exposure experienced by hairdressers because hairdressers are exposed on a daily basis to a range of other compounds such as solvents and propellant gases, including dichloromethane and chlorofluorocarbons.

The observed associations between textile-related occupations and NHL (DLBCL and PTCL) suggest a range of possible exposures that can occur in this environment, but the implication of multiple specific occupations within this group, which is involved in both fabric making and garment making, indicates that associations were not restricted to specific tasks in the textile industry (e.g., textile dyeing) but rather may be associated with more ubiquitous exposures (Siemiatycki et al. 1986).

We found associations with NHL for a number of other occupations potentially exposed to solvents. Among these occupations were cleaners, painters (especially spray-painters) with potential for exposure to solvents in paints and paint strippers, and machine tool operators, who may be exposed to a range of solvents including aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, aromatic hydrocarbon solvents, chlorinated solvents, mineral oils, and diesel fuel and exhaust. Metal workers would also be exposed to metal dust and metal-working fluids. Although our findings of positive associations for these occupations may support a role for solvent exposure as a risk factor for NHL, other exposures may also be responsible.

Some solvent exposure would likely be implicated in two other occupational groups for which we observed an association with NHL: several specific occupations within the electrical and electronics–related group may also have exposure to electromagnetic fields (Mester et al. 2006), and carpenters may be exposed to wood dust, wood preservatives, formaldehyde, and molds in addition to solvents. Forestry workers could also be exposed to wood dust and potentially to pesticides and engine exhausts.

All teaching occupations combined were inversely associated with NHL, a finding that is the opposite of the results of a death certificate–based case–control study (Figgs et al. 1995) and a meta-analysis (Baker et al. 1999). We did observe a marked positive association for preprimary education teachers with CLL/SLL, which could point towards common childhood infections as a possible causal factor (Vineis et al. 2000). Long-term employment as a medical doctor, in which infectious agents may also play a role, was associated with FL.

Among the four NHL subtypes, the statistically significant heterogeneity in relative risk estimates suggested that “women’s hairdressers” were at an increased risk for DLBCL and CLL/SLL, but not for FL, which was previously suggested to be associated with personal hair dye use (Zhang et al. 2008Sangrajrang et al. 2011). Textile workers were another occupational group to show heterogeneity across NHL subtypes and were particularly at risk for DLBCL and PTCL. There was no significant heterogeneity in ORs for crop and mixed/unspecified farming among the four subtypes, although DLBCL and CLL/SLL appeared to be most strongly associated with farming occupations. We note the strong association between spray-painters and FL as well as the lack of adequate numbers for analysis in the other subtypes examined. The authors of a recent major analysis of NHL subtypes and a broad range of risk factors in the InterLymph consortium reported that certain occupations were associated with one or more subtypes, including spray-painters (FL), crop farmers (DLBCL, CLL/SLL), hairdressers (DLBCL, CLL/SLL), and medical doctors (FL). These analyses were adjusted for all other significant risk factors (Morton et al. 2014) and are consistent with our findings. However, our analysis based on occupational titles is not the proper setting in which to explore whether socioeconomic confounders for which we were unable to control might have generated some of our positive findings; such hypotheses need to be specifically addressed in dedicated analyses.

Conclusions

This pooled analysis supports a role for textile-, hairdressing-, and farming-related exposures in the development of NHL. Additional occupations associated with NHL or NHL subtypes include cleaners, painters, printers, and wood workers. The results by sex indicate that occupational exposures may play a role in NHL for both women and men, but the specific occupations involved differ between the sexes. The large numbers of participants and the application of standard NHL and occupational classification systems allowed us to make estimates of relative risk by NHL subtype, forming an important step towards improving our understanding of NHL etiology. The findings of the present study can be further refined at the next stage, after specific exposures are identified in detailed exposure studies.


References

Alavanja MC, Blair A, Masters MN. 1990. Cancer mortality in the U.S. flour industry. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(10):840–848.

Amadori D, Nanni O, Falcini F, Saragoni A, Tison V, Callea A, et al. 1995. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemias and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas by histological type in farming-animal breeding workers: a population case-control study based on job titles. Occup Environ Med 52(6):374–379.

Baker P, Inskip H, Coggon D. 1999. Lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer in teachers. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(1):5–17.

Band PR, Le ND, Fang R, Gallagher R. 2004. Identification of occupational cancer risks in British Columbia: a population-based case–control study of 769 cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma analyzed by histopathology subtypes. J Occup Environ Med 46(5):479–489.

Bernstein L, Allen M, Anton-Culver H, Deapen D, Horn-Ross PL, Peel D, et al. 2002. High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13(7):625–635.

Blair A, Hartge P, Stewart PA, McAdams M, Lubin J. 1998. Mortality and cancer incidence of aircraft maintenance workers exposed to trichloroethylene and other organic solvents and chemicals: extended follow up. Occup Environ Med 55(3):161–171.

Blair A, Linos A, Stewart PA, Burmeister LF, Gibson R, Everett G, et al. 1993. Evaluation of risks for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by occupation and industry exposures from a case-control study. Am J Ind Med 23(2):301–312.

Blair A, Zahm SH, Pearce NE, Heineman EF, Fraumeni JF Jr. 1992. Clues to cancer etiology from studies of farmers. Scand J Work Environ Health 18(4):209–215.

Boffetta P, Andersen A, Lynge E, Barlow L, Pukkala E. 1994. Employment as hairdresser and risk of ovarian cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas among women. J Occup Med 36(1):61–65.

Boffetta P, de Vocht F. 2007. Occupation and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(3):369–372.

Cano MI, Pollán M. 2001. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and occupation in Sweden. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74(6):443–449.

Chia SE, Wong KY, Tai BC. 2012. Occupation and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond) 62(1):29–33.

Chiu BC, Soni L, Gapstur SM, Fought AJ, Evens AM, Weisenburger DD. 2007. Obesity and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18(6):677–685.

Cocco P, ‘t Mannetje A, Fadda D, Melis M, Becker N, de Sanjosé S, et al. 2010. Occupational exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case–control study. Occup Environ Med 67(5):341–347.

De Roos AJ, Hartge P, Lubin JH, Colt JS, Davis S, Cerhan JR, et al. 2005. Persistent organochlorine chemicals in plasma and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Res 65(23):11214–11226.

Delzell E, Grufferman S. 1983. Cancer and other causes of death among female textile workers, 1976–78. J Natl Cancer Inst 71(4):735–740.

Dryver E, Brandt L, Kauppinen T, Olsson H. 2004. Occupational exposures and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Southern Sweden. Int J Occup Environ Health 10(1):13–21.

Eriksson M, Hardell L, Malker H, Weiner J. 1992. Malignant lymphoproliferative diseases in occupations with potential exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or dioxins:a register-based study. Am J Ind Med 22(3):305–312.

Fabbro-Peray P, Daures JP, Rossi JF. 2001. Environmental risk factors for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a population-based case-control study in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Cancer Causes Control 12(3):201–212.

Figgs LW, Dosemeci M, Blair A. 1995. United States non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma surveillance by occupation 1984–1989: a twenty-four state death certificate study. Am J Ind Med 27(6):817–835.

Franceschi S, Serraino D, Bidoli E, Talamini R, Tirelli U, Carbone A, et al. 1989. The epidemiology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the north-east of Italy: a hospital-based case-control study. Leuk Res 13(6):465–472.

Fritschi L, Benke G, Hughes AM, Kricker A, Vajdic CM, Grulich A, et al. 2005. Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with occupational exposure to solvents, metals, organic dusts and PCBs (Australia). Cancer Causes Control 16(5):599–607.

Fritschi L, Siemiatycki J. 1996. Lymphoma, myeloma and occupation: results of a case-control study. Int J Cancer 67(4):498–503.

Fu H, Demers PA, Costantini AS, Winter P, Colin D, Kogevinas M, et al. 1996. Cancer mortality among shoe manufacturing workers: an analysis of two cohorts. Occup Environ Med 53(6):394–398.

Gallagher RP, Threlfall WJ, Band PR, Spinelli JJ. 1985. Cancer mortality experience of woodworkers, loggers, fishermen, farmers, and miners in British Columbia. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 69:163–167.

Hayes RB, Blair A, Stewart PA, Herrick RF, Mahar H. 1990. Mortality of U.S. embalmers and funeral directors. Am J Ind Med 18(6):641–652.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558.

Holly EA, Lele C. 1997. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in HIV-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men in the San Francisco Bay Area: allergies, prior medication use, and sexual practices. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 15(3):211–222.

Hunting KL, Longbottom H, Kalavar SS, Stern F, Schwartz E, Welch LS. 1995. Haematopoietic cancer mortality among vehicle mechanics. Occup Environ Med 52(10):673–678.

ILO (International Labour Office). 1981. International Standard Classification of Occupations. Revised Edition 1968. Geneva:ILO.

Ji J, Hemminki K. 2006. Socioeconomic/occupational risk factors for lymphoproliferative diseases in Sweden. Ann Epidemiol 16(5):370–376.

Keller-Byrne JE, Khuder SA, Schaub EA. 1995. Meta-analysis of leukemia and farming. Environ Res 71(1):1–10.

Keller-Byrne JE, Khuder SA, Schaub EA, McAfee O. 1997. A meta-analysis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among farmers in the central United States. Am J Ind Med 31(4):442–444.

Khuder SA, Schaub EA, Keller-Byrne JE. 1998. Meta-analyses of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and farming. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(4):255–261.

Lahti TA, Partonen T, Kyyrönen P, Kauppinen T, Pukkala E. 2008. Night-time work predisposes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Cancer 123(9):2148–2151.

Last JM, Abramson JH, International Epidemiological Association. 1995. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York:Oxford University Press.

Lee E, Burnett CA, Lalich N, Cameron LL, Sestito JP. 2002. Proportionate mortality of crop and livestock farmers in the United States, 1984–1993. Am J Ind Med 42(5):410–420.

Li FP, Fraumeni JF Jr, Mantel N, Miller RW. 1969. Cancer mortality among chemists. J Natl Cancer Inst 43(5):1159–1164.

Linet MS, Malker HS, McLaughlin JK, Weiner JA, Blot WJ, Ericsson JL, et al. 1993. non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and occupation in Sweden: a registry based analysis. Br J Ind Med 50(1):79–84.

Linos A, Blair A, Cantor KP, Burmeister L, VanLier S, Gibson RW, et al. 1990. Leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among embalmers and funeral directors. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(1):66; doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.1.66.

Lynge E, Andersen A, Rylander L, Tinnerberg H, Lindbohm ML, Pukkala E, et al. 2006. Cancer in persons working in dry cleaning in the Nordic countries. Environ Health Perspect 114:213–219; doi: 10.1289/ehp.8425.

Ma F, Lee DJ, Fleming LE, Dosemeci M. 1998. Race-specific cancer mortality in US firefighters: 1984–1993. J Occup Environ Med 40(12):1134–1138.

Mao Y, Hu J, Ugnat AM, White K. 2000. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and occupational exposure to chemicals in Canada. Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Ann Oncol 11(suppl 1):69–73.

McGuire V, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, Checkoway H, Longstreth WT Jr. 1998. Assessment of occupational exposures in community-based case-control studies. Annu Rev Public Health 19:35–53.

McLean D, Cheng S, ‘t Mannetje A, Woodward A, Pearce N. 2004. Mortality and cancer incidence in New Zealand meat workers. Occup Environ Med 61(6):541–547.

Mester B, Nieters A, Deeg E, Elsner G, Becker N, Seidler A. 2006. Occupation and malignant lymphoma: a population based case control study in Germany. Occup Environ Med 63(1):17–26.

Metayer C, Johnson ES, Rice JC. 1998. Nested case-control study of tumors of the hemopoietic and lymphatic systems among workers in the meat industry. Am J Epidemiol 147(8):727–738.

Miligi L, Seniori Costantini A, Crosignani P, Fontana A, Masala G, Nanni O, et al. 1999. Occupational, environmental, and life-style factors associated with the risk of hematolymphopoietic malignancies in women. Am J Ind Med 36(1):60–69.

Miller BA, Blair AE, Raynor HL, Stewart PA, Zahm SH, Fraumeni JF Jr. 1989. Cancer and other mortality patterns among United States furniture workers. Br J Ind Med 46(8):508–515.

Morton LM, Slager SL, Cerhan JR, Wang SS, Vajdic CM, Skibola CF, et al. 2014. 2014. Etiologic heterogeneity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: the InterLymph Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes Project. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (48):130–144.

Morton LM, Turner JJ, Cerhan JR, Linet MS, Treseler PA, Clarke CA, et al. 2007. Proposed classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research from the Pathology Working Group of the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Blood 110(2):695–708.

Neasham D, Sifi A, Nielsen KR, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Tjønneland A, et al. 2011. Occupation and risk of lymphoma: a multicentre prospective cohort study (EPIC). Occup Environ Med 68(1):77–81.

Olin GR, Ahlbom A. 1980. The cancer mortality among Swedish chemists graduated during three decades. A comparison with the general population and with a cohort of architects. Environ Res 22(1):154–161.

Orsi L, Delabre L, Monnereau A, Delval P, Berthou C, Fenaux P, et al. 2009. Occupational exposure to pesticides and lymphoid neoplasms among men: results of a French case-control study. Occup Environ Med 66(5):291–298.

Ott MG, Teta MJ, Greenberg HL. 1989. Lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue cancer in a chemical manufacturing environment. Am J Ind Med 16(6):631–643.

Pearce NE, Sheppard RA, Smith AH, Teague CA. 1987. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and farming: an expanded case-control study. Int J Cancer 39(2):155–161.

Persson B, Dahlander AM, Fredriksson M, Brage HN, Ohlson CG, Axelson O. 1989. Malignant lymphomas and occupational exposures. Br J Ind Med 46(8):516–520.

Persson B, Fredrikson M. 1999. Some risk factors for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 12(2):135–142.

Persson B, Fredriksson M, Olsen K, Boeryd B, Axelson O. 1993. Some occupational exposures as risk factors for malignant lymphomas. Cancer 72(5):1773–1778.

Rafnsson V. 2001. Incidence of cancer among bookbinders, printers, photoengravers, and typesetters. Occup Environ Med 58(8):523–527.

Reif J, Pearce N, Kawachi I, Fraser J. 1989. Soft-tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers in New Zealand forestry workers. Int J Cancer 43(1):49–54.

Rinsky RA, Ott G, Ward E, Greenberg H, Halperin W, Leet T. 1988. Study of mortality among chemical workers in the Kanawha Valley of West Virginia. Am J Ind Med 13(4):429–438.

Rosenman KD, Reilly MJ. 2004. Cancer mortality and incidence among a cohort of benzidine and dichlorobenzidine dye manufacturing workers. Am J Ind Med 46(5):505–512.

Sama SR, Martin TR, Davis LK, Kriebel D. 1990. Cancer incidence among Massachusetts firefighters, 1982–1986. Am J Ind Med 18(1):47–54.

Sangrajrang S, Renard H, Kuhaprema T, Pornsopone P, Arpornwirat W, Brennan P. 2011. Personal use of hair dyes—increased risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12(9):2393–2396.

Schenk M, Purdue MP, Colt JS, Hartge P, Blair A, Stewart P, et al. 2009. Occupation/industry and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the United States. Occup Environ Med 66(1):23–31.

Scherr PA, Hutchison GB, Neiman RS. 1992. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and occupational exposure. Cancer Res 52(19 suppl):5503s–5509s.

Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF. 2006. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York:Oxford University Press.

Schumacher MC, Delzell E. 1988. A death-certificate case-control study of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and occupation in men in North Carolina. Am J Ind Med 13(3):317–330.

Seniori Costantini A, Miligi L, Kriebel D, Ramazzotti V, Rodella S, Scarpi E, et al. 2001. A multicenter case-control study in Italy on hematolymphopoietic neoplasms and occupation. Epidemiology 12(1):78–87.

Seniori Costantini A, Miligi L, Vineis P. 1998. An Italian multicenter case-control study on malignant neoplasms of the hematolymphopoietic system. Hypothesis and preliminary results on work-related risks. WILL (Working Group on Hematolymphopoietic Malignancies in Italy) [in Italian]. Med Lav 89(2):164–176.

Siemiatycki J, Richardson L, Gérin M, Goldberg M, Dewar R, Désy M, et al. 1986. Associations between several sites of cancer and nine organic dusts: results from an hypothesis-generating case-control study in Montreal, 1979–1983. Am J Epidemiol 123(2):235–249.

Skov T, Lynge E. 1991. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and occupation in Denmark. Scand J Soc Med 19(3):162–169.

Spinelli JJ, Ng CH, Weber JP, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Lai AS, et al. 2007. Organochlorines and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Cancer 121(12):2767–2775.

‘t Mannetje A, Dryson E, Walls C, McLean D, McKenzie F, Maule M, et al. 2008. High risk occupations for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in New Zealand: case–control study. Occup Environ Med 65(5):354–363.

Tatham L, Tolbert P, Kjeldsberg C. 1997. Occupational risk factors for subgroups of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Epidemiology 8(5):551–558.

Thomas TL, Waxweiler RJ, Moure-Eraso R, Itaya S, Fraumeni JF Jr. 1982. Mortality patterns among workers in three Texas oil refineries. J Occup Med 24(2):135–141.

Tranah GJ, Holly EA, Bracci PM. 2009. Solvent exposure and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: no risk in a population-based study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(11):3130–3132.

Villeneuve PJ, Agnew DA, Miller AB, Corey PN. 2000. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among electric utility workers in Ontario: the evaluation of alternate indices of exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 57(4):249–257.

Vineis P, Miligi L, Crosignani P, Fontana A, Masala G, Nanni O, et al. 2000. Delayed infection, family size and malignant lymphomas. J Epidemiol Community Health 54(12):907–911.

Willett EV, Smith AG, Dovey GJ, Morgan GJ, Parker J, Roman E. 2004. Tobacco and alcohol consumption and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Causes Control 15(8):771–780.

Wong O, Morgan RW, Bailey WJ, Swencicki RE, Claxton K, Kheifets L. 1986. An epidemiological study of petroleum refinery employees. Br J Ind Med 43(1):6–17.

Woods JS, Polissar L, Severson RK, Heuser LS, Kulander BG. 1987. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in relation to phenoxyherbicide and chlorinated phenol exposure in western Washington. J Natl Cancer Inst 78(5):899–910.

Zhang Y, Holford TR, Leaderer B, Boyle P, Zahm SH, Flynn S, et al. 2004. Hair-coloring product use and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut. Am J Epidemiol 159(2):148–154.

Zhang Y, Sanjose SD, Bracci PM, Morton LM, Wang R, Brennan P, et al. 2008. Personal use of hair dye and the risk of certain subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Epidemiol 167(11):1321–1331.

Zheng T, Blair A, Zhang Y, Weisenburger DD, Zahm SH. 2002. Occupation and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Occup Environ Med 44(5):469–474.


WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien