Skip to content

Environmental Health Perspectives

Facebook Page EHP Twitter Feed Open Access icon  

Research September 2016 | Volume 124 | Issue 9

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Children's Health
Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1510133

A Statewide Nested Case–Control Study of Preterm Birth and Air Pollution by Source and Composition: California, 2001–2008

Olivier Laurent,1 Jianlin Hu,2,3 Lianfa Li,1 Michael J. Kleeman,2 Scott M. Bartell,1,4 Myles Cockburn,5 Loraine Escobedo,5 and Jun Wu1

Author Affiliations open
1Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA; 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA; 3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; 4Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA; 5Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

PDF icon PDF Version (200 KB)

  • Background: Preterm birth (PTB) has been associated with exposure to air pollution, but it is unclear whether effects might vary among air pollution sources and components.

    Objectives: We studied the relationships between PTB and exposure to different components of air pollution, including gases and particulate matter (PM) by size fraction, chemical composition, and sources.

    Methods: Fine and ultrafine PM (respectively, PM2.5 and PM0.1) by source and composition were modeled across California over 2000–2008. Measured PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone concentrations were spatially interpolated using empirical Bayesian kriging. Primary traffic emissions at fine scale were modeled using CALINE4 and traffic indices. Data on maternal characteristics, pregnancies, and birth outcomes were obtained from birth certificates. Associations between PTB (n = 442,314) and air pollution exposures defined according to the maternal residence at birth were examined using a nested matched case–control approach. Analyses were adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education and neighborhood income.

    Results: Adjusted odds ratios for PTB in association with interquartile range (IQR) increases in average exposure during pregnancy were 1.133 (95% CI: 1.118, 1.148) for total PM2.5, 1.096 (95% CI: 1.085, 1.108) for ozone, and 1.079 (95% CI: 1.065, 1.093) for nitrogen dioxide. For primary PM, the strongest associations per IQR by source were estimated for onroad gasoline (9–11% increase), followed by onroad diesel (6–8%) and commercial meat cooking (4–7%). For PM2.5 composition, the strongest positive associations per IQR were estimated for nitrate, ammonium, and secondary organic aerosols (11–14%), followed by elemental and organic carbon (2–4%). Associations with local traffic emissions were positive only when analyses were restricted to births with residences geocoded at the tax parcel level.

    Conclusions: In our statewide nested case–control study population, exposures to both primary and secondary pollutants were associated with an increase in PTB.

  • Citation: Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Kleeman MJ, Bartell SM, Cockburn M, Escobedo L, Wu J. 2016. A statewide nested case–control study of preterm birth and air pollution by source and composition: California, 2001–2008. Environ Health Perspect 124:1479–1486; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510133

    Address correspondence to J. Wu, Anteater Instruction & Research Building, Room 2034, 653 East Peltason Dr., University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3957 USA. Telephone: (949) 824-0548. E-mail: junwu@uci.edu

    The authors thank B. Ritz (UCLA) and R. Delfino (UCI) for helping start the study and validate air pollution exposure models. The authors also thank the Health Information and Research Section/California Department of Public Health for providing birth certificates data and H. Mangalam, A. Brenner, and J.A. Farran from the High Performance Cluster team at UCI for their technical support. They thank T. Lumley for providing additional information about the ‘survival’ package in R.

    The study was supported by the Health Effect Institute [HEI 4787-RFA09-4110-3 (J.W.)].

    The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

    Received: 25 April 2015
    Revised: 8 July 2015
    Accepted: 4 February 2016
    Published: 19 February 2016

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

  • PDF icon Supplemental Material PDF (570 KB)

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP has provided a 508-conformant table of contents summarizing the Supplemental Material for this article (see below) so readers with disabilities may determine whether they wish to access the full, nonconformant Supplemental Material. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

    PDF icon Supplemental Table of Contents PDF (96 KB)

Introduction

Preterm birth (PTB) is defined as birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation (March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, and WHO 2012). PTB is a major cause for infant death and morbidity, and has also been associated with adverse effects later in life including impaired vision, hearing, and cognitive function, decreased motor function, and behavioral disorders (Saigal and Doyle 2008). Air pollution has been hypothesized to increase the risk of PTB, notably by increasing systemic oxidative stress and inflammation (Vadillo-Ortega et al. 2014), impairing placentation (van den Hooven et al. 2009), causing endocrine disruption (e.g., disturbing the pituitary–adrenocortico–placental system), and increasing maternal susceptibility to infections (Slama et al. 2008). A growing number of studies have reported positive associations between exposure of pregnant women to air pollution and PTB (Kloog et al. 2012; Olsson et al. 2013; Pereira et al. 2014; Stieb et al. 2012; Wilhelm et al. 2011), although results vary widely among studies: Positive associations have been reported between particulate matter (PM) and PTB in some studies (e.g., Kloog et al. 2012; Pereira et al. 2014; Stieb et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2009b), whereas inverse associations have been reported in others (e.g., Trasande et al. 2013; Wilhelm et al. 2011). Beyond the possible influences of methodological differences and of varying population susceptibilities between study settings, such discrepancies might also be attributable to differences in PM composition across settings. Potential effects of PM on PTB might be mediated by core chemical components of PM (e.g., elemental carbon, nitrates) or by organic compounds [e.g. quinones, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)] or metals adsorbed onto the particle surface (Schlesinger et al. 2006). PM composition varies highly across seasons and settings (Bell et al. 2007). To our knowledge, only two U.S. studies have examined the association between PM composition and PTB. In Los Angeles County, California, organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and ammonium nitrate in fine PM (PM2.5; ≤ 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter) were positively associated with PTB, despite an inverse association with total PM2.5 mass (Wilhelm et al. 2011). In Atlanta, Georgia, sulfate and water-soluble metals in PM2.5 were positively associated with PTB despite a lack of association with total PM2.5 mass (Darrow et al. 2009).

The composition of air pollution, and any related health risk that depends on composition, is influenced by the nature of contributing air pollution sources. Identifying the sources most likely to cause PTB is not only a question of scientific interest but also of policy relevance. A large number of studies have examined the relationships between PTB and traffic-related pollutants or proximity to traffic sources. They generally reported positive associations (Généreux et al. 2008; Miranda et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2009b; Yorifuji et al. 2011), with some exceptions (Brauer et al. 2008; Malmqvist et al. 2011). Only a few studies examined PTB in relation to geographical proximity to other sources [oil refineries (Yang et al. 2004), cement plants (Yang et al. 2003), or gasoline stations (Huppé et al. 2013)] or to exposure to PM from specific sources [e.g., open-hearth steel mill (Parker et al. 2008), coal (Mohorovic 2004), diesel (Wilhelm et al. 2011), or biomass burning (Wilhelm et al. 2011; Wylie et al. 2014)]. Only one study examined the association between PTB and PM from several sources within an integrated framework (Wilhelm et al. 2011), which is needed to allow for a rigorous comparison of source influence on PTB and identification of the most harmful sources.

Finally, to the best of our knowledge, the relationship between PTB and ultrafine PM (PM0.1; ≤ 0.1 μm in aerodynamic diameter) has never been studied. Important concerns exist regarding the toxicity of particles in the PM0.1 size fraction due to their larger number concentrations and surface-to-volume ratios relative to fine or coarse PM (Knol et al. 2009), yielding a higher total surface area available for adsorption of toxic chemicals such as metals or PAHs. Ultrafine PM also have higher potential than fine or coarse PM for translocation into organs other than the lung and even into cells (Schlesinger et al. 2006).

In this work we aimed to study the relationships between air pollution and preterm births that occurred during 2001–2008 throughout the state of California. We extended previous research on this topic by using spatiotemporal chemical transport modeling of particles by source and composition and by studying PM0.1 exposure. We also employed more commonly used air pollution metrics such as interpolated measurement data, predictions from a line source dispersion model, traffic density, and proximity to roads. These methods enabled the comparison of the estimated effects of different components and sources of air pollution within a consistent framework, in an attempt to identify those most strongly associated with PTB.

Methods

Air Pollution Metrics

Empirical Bayesian kriging of monitoring station measurements. Measurements from monitoring stations throughout the state for years 2000–2008 were obtained from the California Air Resources Board (http://www.arb.ca.gov/) for total PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). Only results from filter-based measurements, generally conducted every 3 or 6 days, were included for PM2.5. Hourly gaseous pollutant measurements were converted to daily means using a criterion of 75% data completeness at a 24-hr basis. Only data for the 1000- to 1800-hours time windows were used to calculate daily means for O3. Monthly averages for pollutants were then calculated for stations with > 75% days of valid data in a month. These monthly averaged concentrations were spatially interpolated between stations using an empirical Bayesian kriging (EBK) model (Pilz and Spöck 2007) implemented in ArcGIS 10.1 (ESRI, Redlands, CA). Because of the high computational cost, we applied this approach only to monthly averaged concentrations. The number of available monitors per month varied during the study period (ranges, 75–98 for PM2.5, 151–182 for O3, and 94–109 for NO2). Pollutant surface predictions were generated for 200 m × 200 m grids (Wu et al. 2016). Leave-one-out cross-validation was conducted for model evaluation. A single sample of monthly averaged measurement data (at one station) was selected as the test sample while other samples (at the other stations) were used to train the EBK models. This process was repeated so that every monthly sample was estimated independently as the validation data. The resulting R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) estimated were R2 = 0.65 and RMSE = 3.65 μg/m3 for PM2.5; R2 = 0.74 and RMSE = 6.08 ppb for NO2; R2 = 0.72; and RMSE = 5.81 ppb for O3 (Wu et al. 2016).

Chemical transport modeling. The daily mass concentration of primary PM (PM emitted directly into the atmosphere) and of secondary PM (formed in the atmosphere from gas-phase precursors) was estimated at 4-km spatial resolution across two domains covering 92% of the California population for the period of 2000–2008, using the University of California-Davis/California Institute of Technology (UCD/CIT) chemical transport model (Hu et al. 2015). The UCD/CIT model includes a complete description of atmospheric transport, deposition, chemical reaction, and gas-particle transfer (Hu et al. 2015). This model provided mass concentration estimates for primary PM total mass and for several chemical species in PM [OC, EC, nitrates, sulfates, ammonium and secondary organic aerosols (SOA)].

In addition, the University of California Davis/CIT_Primary (UCD_P) chemical transport model was used across the same geographical domain for the period of 2000–2006 to predict the daily mass concentrations for further chemical species and for the total mass of primary PM broken down by source (Hu et al. 2014a, 2014b). The model simulated daily primary PM mass concentrations, also at a 4 km × 4 km grid resolution, from ~ 900 sources. Composition profiles were applied combined with the primary PM mass concentration predictions from the UCD_P model to estimate the concentrations of chemical species in primary PM. The mass, source, and composition of size-resolved PM were simulated by model calculations. We decided a priori to include in our analyses UCD_P estimates of sources and components of primary PM for which previously published detailed validation results were available. Sets of validation results spanned multiple years between 2000 and 2007 (Hu et al. 2014a, 2014b). Previous analyses were conducted to directly evaluate the accuracy of simulated source contributions using the UCD models. These tests included comparison to receptor-oriented source apportionment studies at multiple locations throughout California (Hu et al. 2014b). Onroad gasoline, diesel, commercial meat cooking, and wood burning passed two complex source constraint checks based on a) comparison with tracer-based source-apportionment studies and b) model performance for individual species defined by four criteria (see “Description of the source constraint checks performed to directly evaluate the accuracy of simulated source contributions using the UCD_P model” in the Supplemental Material). Further analysis compared predicted components of PM mass including elemental carbon and various trace metals to measurements at several locations throughout California. We decided a priori to select for the present epidemiological analyses only primary PM components for which correlations between monthly averaged predictions and measured values were > 0.8 in the PM2.5 size fraction (because this fraction has the greatest number of available measurements). Nine species of PM (potassium, chromium, iron, titanium, magnesium, strontium, arsenic, calcium, and zinc) matched this criterion (Hu et al. 2014a).

CALINE4 dispersion modeling for road sources. A modified version of CAlifornia LINE Source Dispersion Model Version 4 (CALINE4) (Benson 1989; Wu et al. 2009a) was used to predict ambient concentrations from local traffic emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and ultrafine particle number (UFP) up to 3 km from maternal residences (Yuan et al. 2011). Model inputs included roadway geometry and traffic counts, emission factors, and meteorological parameters (wind direction, wind speed, temperature stability class, and mixing heights). CALINE4 predictions were not conducted for 5% of births, for which no traffic count data were recorded within 3 km of the maternal residences. CALINE4 predictions in this study did not incorporate background levels of pollutants, and thus solely represent the contribution from local traffic emissions (Wu et al. 2016). We compared the CALINE4-modeled daily UFP number concentrations with particle number concentrations measured using the Condensation Particle Counter (model 3785; TSI, Inc., Shoreview, MN) at four monitoring sites located in southern California from a separate study (Delfino et al. 2010). The measurements contained 86–92 days of data at each site, with a total of 357 days of measurements from all the sites. The overall correlation between the modeled and the measured concentrations of particle numbers was 0.75. More details about the model evaluation can be found elsewhere (Wu et al. 2016).

Traffic and roadways. Traffic densities within circular buffers of different sizes centered on maternal homes were calculated based on 2002 annual average daily traffic counts (AADT) data from the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS 2012). To estimate traffic density, AADT on each road segment was weighted by the length of this same road segment within the buffer. These traffic densities for 2002 were then scaled to other years based on temporal trends in total vehicle miles traveled (from 2000 through 2008) in California (CALTRANS 2013).

U.S. major roads data based on TeleAtlas streets (ESRI 2010) were used to calculate the distance from each maternal home to the nearest major road [defined by categories of functional road classes (FRC) A0–A5].

Study Population

Birth certificate records for all births occurring from 1 January 2001 through 31 December 2008 in California (n = 4,385,997) were obtained from the California Department of Public Health. Maternal addresses of residence recorded on birth certificates were geocoded using the University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory geocoding engine (Goldberg et al. 2008), which geocoded maternal residences at the centroid of tax parcels whenever feasible. In total, we had 54.02% of addresses geocoded within a parcel. Further, we had 37.23% of all births that were geocoded within 50 m of a parcel. In addition, 8.55% of addresses were in California but not within or close to a parcel, and they were geocoded to the centroid of the ZIP code or city whenever feasible. In total, 1,361 births had no usable coordinates at all, and 7,512 infants were born to women residing outside of California. After excluding these births and those who had state file number information missing (n = 8,119, partially overlapping with births that lacked usable coordinates or occurred outside of California), we obtained birth certificate data for 4,370,371 pregnancies.

Infants with recorded birth defects or unknown birth defects status (n = 18,811 and n = 675, respectively) were excluded. The time of conception and resulting gestational age (in days) were estimated based on the first day of the last menstrual period reported by mothers. We excluded birth with missing information for gestational age (n = 196,247), estimated gestational age < 121 or > 319 days (n = 2,051 and n = 41,017, respectively), implausible combinations of birth weight and gestational age (n = 17,026) (Alexander et al. 1996), or infants born to mothers > 60 years of age (n = 43). Infants conceived > 19 weeks before the start (1 January 2001), or < 43 weeks before the end (31 December 2008) of the study (n = 389,611 and n = 38,598, respectively) were further excluded to avoid fixed cohort bias (Strand et al. 2011). Several exclusion criteria overlapped for certain births, leaving 3,870,696 births from the source population eligible for the study. All PTB cases (infants born < 37 gestational weeks) from the source population that met the eligibility criteria (n = 442,314) were included in the present study. For each PTB case, two controls (infants born ≥ 37 gestational weeks) matched on the calendar year of conception (determined from the estimated date of conception, as explained above) were randomly selected from the source population without replacement. The same approach was employed for sensitivity analyses of moderately preterm births (MPTB cases, born < 35 weeks, n = 158,645 and controls born at ≥ 35 weeks) and very preterm births (VPTB cases, born < 30 weeks, n = 29,510 and controls born ≥ 30 weeks).

Statistical Analyses

We used a nested matched case–control approach to analyze the association between each air pollutant and PTB (or MPTB or VPTB) (Huynh et al. 2006; Wilhelm et al. 2011). This approach was used instead of a full cohort analysis because of the computational difficulties in fitting models with about 4,000,000 observations. Because controls were randomly selected from a source cohort population basis, this design is free from selection biases often encountered in classical case–control studies and produces results comparable with those of a cohort analysis with little loss in efficiency (Kass and Gold 2007). Because by definition cases are born preterm and controls experience a longer gestation time, cases and controls were exposed to air pollution during different periods of gestation. To allow for a valid comparison of exposures between cases and controls, for each control we truncated exposure estimates at the gestational age reached by the PTB (or MPTB or VPTB) case to which it had been matched. To account for this risk set design, conditional logistic regression was employed for the analysis of the association between air pollution and preterm birth, using the “survival” package of the R environment, version 3.0.1. (R Core Team 2013). Robust standard errors were estimated (Lee et al. 2013). Inferences were based on statistical significance at the 5% level.

For pollutant measurements interpolated by EBK (total PM2.5, O3, and NO2), for UCD_P, UCD/CIT, and CALINE4 predictions, we conducted analyses for “average pregnancy exposures” (which for controls was actually truncated at the gestational age in days reached by cases to which they were matched). We conducted analyses according to exposure categories for pollutant concentrations, defined as quartiles of the exposure metric distribution in the case–control set. We also introduced air pollution metrics as linear terms in the models and then report odds ratios (ORs) for PTB for an interquartile range (IQR) in air pollution metrics. IQRs were derived separately for each model, so that IQRs for the same pollutant may vary between the main analysis and sensitivity analyses. To allow for the comparison of associations between PTB and traffic density across buffers of different sizes, we scaled risk estimates to an increase of 10,000 vehicles per day per meter for this exposure metric. Distance to roadway was analyzed using dichotomous indicators for living or not living within certain distances from roads.

Risk factors for PTB other than air pollution were identified from the literature, and a causal diagram was drawn (see Figure S1) to identify the minimal set of potential confounders to adjust for (Greenland et al. 1999). In our primary analyses we adjusted for educational level (in categories defined as follows: ≤ 8th grade, 9th grade to high school, and college education), maternal race/ethnicity (in mutually exclusive categories as follows: African American, Asian, Hispanic regardless of race, non-Hispanic white, and others including Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders, American Indian/Alaskan native and mothers with multiple race/ethnicities specified), maternal age, and median household income by census block group (U.S. Census Bureau 2004), using quadratic polynomial functions. However, we acknowledge uncertainties in our causal diagram; incorrect assessment of the causal relationships could affect selection of the minimal set of potential confounders for adjustment. We therefore examined the effects of further adjustment for body mass index (BMI) at the beginning of pregnancy or for smoking during pregnancy in addition to the covariates included in the primary model, in the subset of infants born in 2007 and 2008, because these variables were not recorded on birth certificates in the previous years.

The use of two-pollutant models was explored for measured ambient concentrations interpolated with EBK. Last, for traffic indicators at fine geographic scale (CALINE4 estimates traffic density, distance to roads), we explored the influence of geocoding accuracy by a separate analysis of the subgroup of births geocoded at the tax parcel level (the highest quality geocoding).

Because of the low percentages of missing data and long computation times, we conducted complete case analyses only. If data were missing for one case, the entire risk set it belonged to (i.e., the case and its two matched controls) was excluded from the analyses, whereas if data were missing for one control but not for the other subjects of the risk set (i.e., the matched case and other control of the risk set), these other subjects contributed to the likelihood calculation. The numbers of cases and controls included in analyses of the associations between PTB and air pollution metrics (and to some extent, the ratio of these numbers that depended on the proportion of missing data, as explained above) varied by the type of air pollution metrics because these metrics covered slightly different populations. Traffic density and distances to the nearest roadways were available for the entire state, whereas some very limited portions of the state could not be covered by the surfaces predicted by the EBK (> 98% of births were covered). CALINE4 exposures were calculated only for mothers who resided within 3 km from roadways with traffic count data (95% of all births). UCD/CIT exposures were available for the most populous area of the state where 92% of the population lived, whereas UCD_P exposures were available for the same domain, but for years 2000–2006 only.

The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of California, Irvine. Informed consent from study participants was not required because the nature of the study was analysis of existing data, which posed minimal risk to the subjects. In addition, it was not practically feasible to contact all the subjects.

Results

Among the eligible births, 11.43% of infants were born preterm. The distribution of cases and their matched controls by maternal characteristics, diseases, and neighborhood income level is shown in Table 1. Descriptive statistics for air pollution metrics and their correlations are presented in Table S1.

Table 1 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 1 – Description of the case/control set population characteristics.

View Table (HTML Version)
View larger image (TIF File)

ORs for PTB in association with IQR increases in average exposure during pregnancy were positive and statistically significant: 1.133 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.118, 1.148] for a 6.45-μg/m3 increase in total PM2.5, 1.096 (95% CI: 1.085, 1.108) for a 11.53-ppb increase in O3, and 1.079 (95% CI: 1.065, 1.093) for a 9.99-ppb increase in NO2, after adjustment for confounders (Table 2). In two-pollutant models, the positive association between PTB and PM2.5 was robust to adjustment for either NO2 or O3. However, the association with NO2 was no longer positive when adjusted for total PM2.5. When NO2 and O3 were both introduced into the same model, associations with PTB remained positive and significant for these two pollutants (Table 2).

Table 2 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 2 – Associations between preterm births and measured air pollutant concentrations interpolated by empirical Bayesian kriging in California.

View Table (HTML Version)
View larger image (TIF File)

Associations between PTB and primary PM2.5 or PM0.1 modeled at a 4 km × 4 km resolution were also positive and statistically significant (Table 3). For sources of primary PM0.1 modeled at a 4 km × 4 km resolution using the UCD_P model (for years 2000–2006 only), the strongest associations per IQR in exposure were observed for on-road gasoline, followed by on-road diesel and commercial meat cooking. An inverse association was observed for wood burning. Patterns by source were similar for primary PM2.5, but overall, associations per IQR in exposure appear slightly weaker than those for PM0.1. However, when all sources of primary PM (including onroad gasoline, diesel, commercial meat cooking, and wood burning but also other, less well characterized sources) modeled using the UCD/CIT model for years 2000–2008 were grouped together, associations per IQR in exposure were higher for primary PM2.5 than for primary PM0.1 (Table 3).

Table 3 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 3 – Associations between preterm births and particulate matter concentrations modeled at the 4 km × 4 km resolution by species and sources using chemical transport models in California.

View Table (HTML Version)
View larger image (TIF File)

For PM2.5 composition modeled at a 4 km × 4 km resolution using the UCD/CIT model (for years 2000–2008), the strongest positive associations with PTB per IQR in exposure were observed for nitrate, ammonium and SOA, followed by EC, OC, and sulfate (Table 3). For PM2.5 composition modeled at a 4 km × 4 km resolution using the UCD_P model (for years 2000–2006 only), a positive association was observed between PTB and potassium, whereas inverse associations were observed with iron, strontium, calcium, and zinc exposure (Table 3). No significant association was observed for the other chemical species investigated.

Analyses by quartile of exposure showed monotonic increases in PTB with increasing exposure to total PM2.5, O3, and NO2 estimated using EBK; and primary PM2.5 and PM2.5 species estimated using UCD/CIT; but not PM2.5 species estimated using UCD_P. ORs showed monotonic increases across quartiles of primary PM0.1 and PM0.1 species estimated using UCD/CIT; and for UCD_P estimates of primary PM (either PM2.5 or PM0.1) from on-road gasoline, on-road diesel, and commercial meat cooking. Nevertheless, ORs for primary PM (either PM2.5 or PM0.1) from wood burning decreased as exposures increased (see Figure S2).

For indicators of traffic-related pollution at fine geographical resolution (CALINE4 predictions, traffic density, and distance to roads), associations with PTB were sensitive to the accuracy of geocoding. In the entire population, these indicators were generally inversely associated with PTB (Table 4). However when analyses were restricted to the births geocoded at the tax parcel level, CALINE4 predictions for UFP, CO, and NOx were all positively associated with PTB (Table 4). Positive associations with traffic density and distance to roads (only within 150 m for distance to roads) were also observed only when restricting to parcel geocoded births (Table 4).

Table 4 - Select View Table (HTML Version) for a 508-conformant versionTable 4 – Associations between preterm births and indicators of traffic-related pollution at fine geographic scale in California, by geocoding accuracy.

View Table (HTML Version)
View larger image (TIF File)

Sensitivity analyses showed that further adjustment for PTB risk factors other than maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, and neighborhood median income changed risk estimates by ≤ 10%, except for BMI. The results of sensitivity analyses (years 2007–2008) with adjustment for BMI or smoking, in addition to the covariates included in the primary models are shown in Table S2.

Overall, similar results were observed for MPTB and VPTB as those for PTB, except positive associations were observed between MPTB and iron, titanium, magnesium and strontium and between VPTB and titanium and magnesium (see Table S3). However, no significant association was observed between VPTB and UCD_P predictions of PM by sources.

Discussion

A major asset of this large study is the wealth of air pollution metrics. California has the densest ambient PM measurement network of any state in the United States, and detailed emissions inventories (Hu et al. 2015). Rich environmental data sets (e.g., PM species measurements and receptor-oriented source apportionment studies at multiple sites) were available to support exposure model application and evaluation.

The respective strengths and limitations of the various air pollution metrics used in this study, notably for their use in epidemiological studies of pregnancy outcomes, have been discussed extensively in other papers (Benson 1989; Hu et al. 2014a, 2014b, 2015; Laurent et al. 2013, 2014; Wu et al. 2009b) and in a report (Wu et al. 2016). Briefly, the interpolation of ambient measurements for PM2.5, NO2, and O3 using EBK avoids biases from assigning data from one single monitor to populations living farther away (Laurent et al. 2014). It captures general temporal and spatial trends in ambient concentrations of three pollutants (total PM2.5, NO2, and O3), but not the small-scale spatial variations (e.g., within a few hundred meters) because only 75–182 monitoring sites were located over the entire state of California depending on the pollutant and time period, and because EBK does not incorporate spatial covariates for prediction (in contrast with land use regression). However, leave-one-out cross-validation results for EBK were satisfactory for monthly concentrations, with correlation coefficients of 0.74, 0.72, and 0.65 for O3, NO2, and total PM2.5 respectively (Wu et al. 2016).

The chemical transport models capture spatial variability in ambient concentrations better, but are less capable at capturing temporal variability. However, they cover pollutants for which measurement data are very scarce, such as ultrafine PM (Hu et al. 2014b), chemical species in PM (Hu et al. 2014a, 2015), and source-specific primary PM (Hu et al. 2014b). Validation studies have been conducted for UCD_P (Hu et al. 2014a, 2014b) and UCD/CIT (Hu et al. 2015) to identify those particle size fractions, chemical components, and sources that are suitable for inclusion in epidemiologic studies. Only four major sources of primary PM that passed the direct validation checks (agreement between modeled concentrations and the results of source apportionment studies across several locations and in different episodes in California, as explained above and in “Description of the source constraint checks performed to directly evaluate the accuracy of simulated source contributions using the UCD_P model” in the Supplemental Material) were included in the present study. They represent some of the most ubiquitous sources in the environment of urban and/or rural populations (Hu et al. 2014b). Similarly, we included in the analyses only primary PM components for which correlations between monthly averaged predictions and measured values were > 0.8. Total PM0.1 mass was also included in the analysis because prediction agreed well with measurements (R = 0.81) (Hu et al. 2014a). For secondary species, we included pollutants with model performance in reasonably good agreement with measurements (for concentrations averaged on several months: organic carbon, nitrate, and ammonium), according to standard criteria for acceptable model performance as discussed by Boylan and Russell (2006): mean fractional error ≤ 50% and mean fractional bias within ± 30% (Hu et al. 2015). Sulfates were also included because they are a non-negligible contributor to total PM mass (Bell et al. 2007) even though the predicted sulfate concentrations are not satisfactory (Boylan and Russell 2006) due to missing emission sources (Hu et al. 2015). Predictions for SOA concentrations could not be validated because it is difficult to differentiate the SOA fraction from total organic aerosol in the measurements. Caution must therefore be taken when interpreting results for sulfate and SOA in our study.

Because both EBK and chemical transport models had limited geographical resolution and traffic emissions may be highly heterogeneous at finer geographic scales, CALINE4 predictions were used to capture such small-scale variations in primary traffic emissions (Benson 1989; Laurent et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2009a). CALINE4 estimates have limited temporal variability because CALINE4 is a simple Gaussian dispersion model that does not consider complex atmospheric mechanisms of transport, deposition, chemical reaction, and gas-particle transformation. In addition, model inputs have limited temporal resolution (e.g., annual average traffic counts, estimated mixing height by season and time of day). However, the model worked reasonably well with an overall correlation of 0.75 between modeled and measured daily average particle number concentrations at three monitoring sites in Los Angeles County and one site in Riverside County, California (Wu et al. 2016).

Traffic density and distance to roads are cruder proxies of traffic-related pollution than CALINE4 predictions, but were used to check for consistency of our results with numerous studies which used similar indicators.

As a general limitation, the personal exposure of mothers during pregnancy could not be estimated in this study because we did not have time–activity information for the population (Wu et al. 2011). Our air pollution metrics relied solely on maternal home address at the time of delivery because previous residences during pregnancy were unavailable in birth certificates.

The statistical models used for the main analyses were adjusted for a set of potential confounders selected using a causal diagram: maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, and neighborhood median income. All of them are strong and well-documented risk factors for PTB and air pollution exposures, and they are reported with relatively high accuracy on birth certificates (Northam and Knapp 2006). Additional adjustment for further risk factors had very limited impact on the results; therefore, results of such analyses are provided only for smoking or BMI (see Table S2). It is possible that the negligible impact of adjusting for smoking or for some chronic diseases is partly attributable to underreporting of these factors in birth certificates, leading to a very low proportion of women with such factors effectively documented in our population (0.4% for chronic hypertension, 2.9% for total diabetes, and 2.5% for smoking in 2007–2008 data). However, our sensitivity analyses suggest that if further adjusting for smoking has any effect, it is toward increasing the risk estimates of the associations between air pollution and PTB (except for O3). On the contrary, further adjusting for BMI slightly reduced the associations between most air pollutants and PTB, but did not change the conclusions of the analyses (see Table S2).

We found a positive association between PTB and total measured PM2.5. This is consistent with some (Dadvand et al. 2014; Kloog et al. 2012; Pereira et al. 2014; Stieb et al. 2012) but not all (Trasande et al. 2013; Wilhelm et al. 2011) previous studies. Again, because the composition of PM2.5 substantially varies in time and space, contrasted findings from one setting to another are expected. Our PM2.5 finding is consistent with a previous California study conducted during an earlier period (1999–2000) (Huynh et al. 2006).

Only previous studies of smaller sizes (i.e., including ≤ 50,000 PTB cases) examined the associations between PTB and PM by source (Brauer et al. 2008; Généreux et al. 2008; Huppé et al. 2013; Malmqvist et al. 2011; Miranda et al. 2013; Mohorovic 2004; Parker et al. 2008; Wilhelm et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2009b; Wylie et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2003, 2004; Yorifuji et al. 2011) or composition (Darrow et al. 2009; Wilhelm et al. 2011). We found primary PM from several sources to be positively associated with PTB. Consistent findings have been reported previously from other studies for diesel sources and meat cooking (Wilhelm et al. 2011).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of ultrafine particles and PTB. Positive associations were observed with both the mass (UCD_P) and number (CALINE4, in births geocoded to tax parcels) of primary ultrafine particles (from local traffic emissions, for the latter). In our study associations between PTB and an IQR increase in PM from each source were slightly stronger for PM0.1 than for PM2.5, as expected because of the higher total surface area available for adsorption of toxic chemicals and higher potential for translocation of PM0.1, than of PM2.5 (Knol et al. 2009). However, an opposite pattern (stronger association with an IQR increase in PM2.5 compared with PM0.1) was observed for the total mass of primary PM, which was unexpected for the reasons mentioned above. The observed inverse associations between PTB and PM0.1 or PM2.5 from wood burning were also unexpected.

Our finding of an association with EC and OC in PM is consistent with a previous study based on speciation monitor measurements in Los Angeles (Wilhelm et al. 2011). The positive associations observed with NO2 (EBK) and NOx (CALINE4, in births geocoded to tax parcels) are also echoed by other studies (Dadvand et al. 2014; Wilhelm et al. 2011). The associations we observed for potassium (positive), strontium, zinc, iron, and calcium (all inverse) are unprecedented, but no clear dose–response gradients were observed for these species, except for calcium (see Figure S2).

Regarding secondary pollutants, we found an increased risk of PTB with exposure to O3 [consistent with some (Lin et al. 2015; Olsson et al. 2013) but not all (Stieb et al. 2012) previous studies] and other secondary pollutants such as nitrate, ammonium, SOA, and sulfate. A recent study in Los Angeles County reported a positive association between PTB and measured ammonium nitrate in PM2.5 (Wilhelm et al. 2011). This is clearly consistent with our results. However, another study in Atlanta using a time-series methodology reported no association between PTB and nitrate or ammonium (Darrow et al. 2009). Darrow et al. (2009) also reported a positive association with sulfate, a pollutant that has higher concentrations in the eastern than in western United States (Bell et al. 2007) and for which the modeling performance was suboptimal in our study setting (Hu et al. 2015). We estimated a novel positive association between PTB and SOA, but this finding should be interpreted with caution given that SOA predictions have not been validated against measured values.

Interestingly, our findings for the associations between PTB and local traffic-related pollution characterized at a fine geographical resolution using predictions from the CALINE4 model, traffic density, or distance to roads are highly sensitive to the accuracy of geocoding. If an increase in PTB risk really occurs only within a short distance from roads (e.g., < 200 m), as our results suggest, then imprecise geocoding could easily introduce substantial exposure measurement error, obscuring any epidemiological associations with local traffic emissions. This might help explain some inconsistent findings from the literature, although most studies have reported positive associations between PTB and traffic exposure (Généreux et al. 2008; Miranda et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2009b; Yorifuji et al. 2011). Future studies may benefit from restriction to participants with the highest quality geocode, at least as part of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

In this large study, both primary and secondary pollutants are associated with increased PTB risk. Consistent results obtained using complementary exposure matrices supports previous evidence that primary traffic-related pollutants might increase PTB risk. Among the sources of primary PM0.1 and PM2.5 we evaluated, traffic (as represented by on-road gasoline and diesel) is the most strongly associated with PTB per IQR in exposure. Positive associations between PTB and PM2.5 components were the strongest for IQR increases in nitrate, ammonium and secondary organic aerosols, followed by elemental carbon and organic carbon.


References

Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. 1996. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 87(2):163–168.

Bell ML, Dominici F, Ebisu K, Zeger SL, Samet JM. 2007. Spatial and temporal variation in PM2.5 chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies. Environ Health Perspect 115:989–995, doi: 10.1289/ehp.9621.

Benson PE. 1989. CALINE4: A Dispersion Model for Predicting Air Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadways. Sacramento, CA:California Department of Transportation.

Boylan JW, Russell AG. 2006. PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmos Environ 40(26):4946–4959.

Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. 2008. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 116:680–686, doi: 10.1289/ehp.10952.

CALTRANS (California Department of Transportation). 2012. Traffic Census Program. Traffic Counts. Available: http://traffic-counts.dot.ca.gov/ [accessed 16 October 2012].

CALTRANS. 2013. Traffic Count Branch Historical Monthly Vehicle Miles of Travel 1972–2012. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/docs/VMTHIST1.pdf [accessed 4 April 2013].

Dadvand P, Basagaña X, Figueras F, Martinez D, Beelen R, Cirach M, et al. 2014. Air pollution and preterm premature rupture of membranes: a spatiotemporal analysis. Am J Epidemiol 179(2):200–207.

Darrow LA, Klein M, Flanders WD, Waller LA, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. 2009. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth: a time-series analysis. Epidemiology 20(5):689–698.

Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, Arhami M, Polidori A, Gillen DL, et al. 2010. Associations of primary and secondary organic aerosols with airway and systemic inflammation in an elderly panel cohort. Epidemiology. 21(6):892–902.

ESRI. 2010. U.S. Major Roads. 10th ed. Redlands, CA:ESRI® Data & Maps.

Généreux M, Auger N, Goneau M, Daniel M. 2008. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among mothers living near highways. J Epidemiol Community Health 62(8):695–700.

Goldberg DW, Wilson JP, Knoblock CA, Ritz B, Cockburn MG. 2008. An effective and efficient approach for manually improving geocoded data. Int J Health Geogr 7:60, doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-60.

Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. 1999. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10(1):37–48.

Hu J, Zhang H, Chen SH, Wiedinmyer C, Vandenberghe F, Ying Q, et al. 2014a. Predicting primary PM2.5 and PM0.1 trace composition for epidemiological studies in California. Environ Sci Technol 48(9):4971–4979.

Hu J, Zhang H, Chen S, Ying Q, Wiedinmyer C, Vandenberghe F, et al. 2014b. Identifying PM2.5 and PM0.1 sources for epidemiological studies in California. Environ Sci Technol 48(9):4980–4990.

Hu J, Zhang H, Ying Q, Chen SH, Vandenberghe F, Kleeman MJ. 2015. Long-term particulate matter modeling for health effects studies in California – part 1: model performance on temporal and spatial variations. Atmos Chem Phys 15:3445–3461 doi: 10.5194/acp-15-3445-2015.

Huppé V, Kestens Y, Auger N, Daniel M, Smargiassi A. 2013. Residential proximity to gasoline service stations and preterm birth. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20(10):7186–7193.

Huynh M, Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Schoendorf KC. 2006. Relationships between air pollution and preterm birth in California. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20(6):454–461.

Kass PH, Gold ED. 2007. Nested case-control studies. In: Handbook of Epidemiology (Ahrens W, Pigeot I, eds). Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag, 327–329.

Kloog I, Melly SJ, Ridgway WL, Coull BA, Schwartz J. 2012. Using new satellite based exposure methods to study the association between pregnancy PM2.5 exposure, premature birth and birth weight in Massachusetts. Environ Health 11:40, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-40.

Knol AB, de Hartog JJ, Boogaard H, Slottje P, van der Sluijs JP, Lebret E, et al. 2009. Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: likelihood of health effects and causal pathways. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:19, doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-19.

Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Cockburn M, Escobedo L, Kleeman MJ, et al. 2014. Sources and contents of air pollution affecting term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, 2001–2008. Environ Res 134:488–495.

Laurent O, Wu J, Li LF, Chung J, Bartell S. 2013. Investigating the association between birth weight and complementary air pollution metrics: a cohort study. Environ Health 12:18, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-18.

Lee PC, Roberts JM, Catov JM, Talbott EO, Ritz B. 2013. First trimester exposure to ambient air pollution, pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Allegheny County, PA. Matern Child Health J 17(3):545–555.

Lin YT, Jung CR, Lee YL, Hwang BF. 2015. Associations between ozone and preterm birth in women who develop gestational diabetes. Am J Epidemiol 181(4):280–287.

Malmqvist E, Rignell-Hydbom A, Tinnerberg H, Björk J, Stroh E, Jakobsson K, et al. 2011. Maternal exposure to air pollution and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 119:553–558, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002564.

March of Dimes, PMNCH (Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health), Save the Children, WHO (World Health Organization). 2012. Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth (Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE, eds). Geneva:World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/entity/pmnch/media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon-report.pdf [accessed 20 June 2012].

Miranda ML, Edwards SE, Chang HH, Auten RL. 2013. Proximity to roadways and pregnancy outcomes. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23(1):32–38.

Mohorovic L. 2004. First two months of pregnancy—critical time for preterm delivery and low birthweight caused by adverse effects of coal combustion toxics. Early Hum Dev 80(2):115–123.

Northam S, Knapp TR. 2006. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 35(1):3–12.

Olsson D, Mogren I, Forsberg B. 2013. Air pollution exposure in early pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a register-based cohort study. BMJ Open 3:e001955, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001955.

Parker JD, Mendola P, Woodruff TJ. 2008. Preterm birth after the Utah Valley Steel Mill closure: a natural experiment. Epidemiology 19(6):820–823.

Pereira G, Belanger K, Ebisu K, Bell ML. 2014. Fine particulate matter and risk of preterm birth in Connecticut in 2000–2006: a longitudinal study. Am J Epidemiol 179(1):67–74.

Pilz J, Spöck G. 2007. Why do we need and how should we implement Bayesian kriging methods. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(5):621–632.

R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available: http://www.R-project.org [accessed 30 December 2013].

Saigal S, Doyle LW. 2008. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 371(9608):261–269.

Schlesinger RB, Kunzli N, Hidy GM, Gotschi T, Jerrett M. 2006. The health relevance of ambient particulate matter characteristics: coherence of toxicological and epidemiological inferences. Inhal Toxicol 18(2):95–125.

Slama R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. 2008. Meeting report: atmospheric pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect 116:791–798, doi: 10.1289/ehp.11074.

Stieb DM, Chen L, Eshoul M, Judek S. 2012. Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res 117:100–111.

Strand LB, Barnett AG, Tong S. 2011. Methodological challenges when estimating the effects of season and seasonal exposures on birth outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:49, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-49.

Trasande L, Wong K, Roy A, Savitz DA, Thurston G. 2013. Exploring prenatal outdoor air pollution, birth outcomes and neonatal health care utilization in a nationally representative sample. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23(3):315–321.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Summary Tape File 3A. Washington, DC:U.S. Census Bureau.

Vadillo-Ortega F, Osornio-Vargas A, Buxton MA, Sánchez BN, Rojas-Bracho L, Viveros-Alcaráz M, et al. 2014. Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth: a potential mechanistic link. Med Hypotheses 82(2):219–224.

van den Hooven EH, Jaddoe VW, de Kluizenaar Y, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, et al. 2009. Residential traffic exposure and pregnancy-related outcomes: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ Health 8:59, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-59.

Wilhelm M, Ghosh JK, Su J, Cockburn M, Jerrett M, Ritz B. 2011. Traffic-related air toxics and preterm birth: a population-based case-control study in Los Angeles County, California. Environ Health 10:89, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-89.

Wu J, Houston D, Lurmann F, Ong P, Winer A. 2009a. Exposure of PM2.5 and EC from diesel and gasoline vehicles in communities near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Atmos Environ 43(12):1962–1971.

Wu J, Jiang C, Houston D, Baker D, Delfino R. 2011. Automated time activity classification based on global positioning system (GPS) tracking data. Environ Health 10:101, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-101.

Wu J, Laurent O, Li L, Hu J, Kleeman M. 2016. Adverse Reproductive Health Outcomes and Exposure to Gaseous and Particulate-Matter Air Pollution in Pregnant Women. Research Report 188. Boston, MA:Health Effects Institute.

Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2009b. Association between local traffic-generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the South Coast Air Basin of California. Environ Health Perspect 117:1773–1779, doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800334.

Wylie BJ, Coull BA, Hamer DH, Singh MP, Jack D, Yeboah-Antwi K, et al. 2014. Impact of biomass fuels on pregnancy outcomes in central East India. Environ Health 13(1):1, doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-1.

Yang CY, Chang CC, Chuang HY, Ho CK, Wu TN, Chang PY. 2004. Increased risk of preterm delivery among people living near the three oil refineries in Taiwan. Environ Int 30(3):337–342.

Yang CY, Chang CC, Tsai SS, Chuang HY, Ho CK, Wu TN, et al. 2003. Preterm delivery among people living around Portland cement plants. Environ Res 92(1):64–68.

Yorifuji T, Naruse H, Kashima S, Ohki S, Murakoshi T, Takao S, et al. 2011. Residential proximity to major roads and preterm births. Epidemiology 22(1):74–80.

Yuan Y, Zhu Y, Wu J. 2011. Modeling traffic-emitted ultrafine particle concentration and intake fraction in Corpus Christi, Texas. Chem Product Process Model 6(1):8, doi: 10.2202/1934-2659.1510.


WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien