Silica-Based Nanoparticle Uptake and Cellular Response by Primary Microglia

Background Silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are being formulated for cellular imaging and for nonviral gene delivery in the central nervous system (CNS), but it is unclear what potential effects SiNPs can elicit once they enter the CNS. As the resident macrophages of the CNS, microglia are the cells most likely to respond to SiNP entry into the brain. Upon activation, they are capable of undergoing morphological and functional changes. Objective We examined the effects of SiNP exposure using primary rat microglia. Methods We observed microglial uptake of SiNPs using transmission electron and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Microglial functions, including phagocytosis, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), expression of proinflammatory genes, and cytokine release, were measured after SiNP exposure at different concentrations. Results Microglia are capable of avidly taking up SiNPs at all concentrations tested. These same concentrations did not elicit cytotoxicity or a change in phagocytic activity. SiNPs did increase the productions of both intracellular ROS and RNS. We also observed a significant decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α gene expression at all concentrations tested and a significant increase in COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) gene expression at the highest concentration of SiNPs. Analysis of cytokine release showed a detectable level of interleukin-1β. Conclusions This is the first study demonstrating the in vitro effects of SiNPs in primary microglia. Our findings suggest that very low levels of SiNPs are capable of altering microglial function. Increased ROS and RNS production, changes in proinflammatory genes, and cytokine release may not only adversely affect microglial function but also affect surrounding neurons.


Research
The use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) has increased significantly in the past decade. Because of the flexibility of producing NPs of different sizes, shapes, and surface modifications, engineered NPs can be used in a variety of applications, including skin care products, foods, electronics, and medi cine. Anthropogenic sources of NPs also emerge from power plants and industries. It is likely that humans will be exposed to NPs through dermal absorption, ingestion, and inhalation. This may pose a health concern because studies have shown that NPs can elicit adverse cellu lar effects in vitro (Fubini and Hubbard 2003;Napierska et al. 2009;Park and Park 2009). A recent study has shown that workers occupationally exposed to NPs for 5-13 months exhibited symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis, with NPs present in the cytoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells (Song et al. 2009).
Entry of engineered NPs into the brain may be possible via several pathways. One of the well-studied pathways is the nose-to-brain transport through the olfactory epithelium. Olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) reside in the olfactory epithelium and have processes in direct contact with the outside environment. Thus, NPs might be able to gain access to the brain by OSNs and its projections to the olfactory bulb and subsequently to other regions in the brain (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al. 2002;Oberdörster et al. 2004). Another possible nose-to-brain transport can occur through the tri geminal nerve, the largest of the cranial nerves. Afferent neurons from the tri geminal nerve pass directly through the nasal mucosa and enter the brainstem at the level of the pons (Mistry et al. 2009). For example, in rats, intranasal adminis tra tion of the neuro trophic factor insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) resulted in the delivery of IGF-1 to both the olfactory bulb and brainstem areas (Thorne et al. 2004). In addition, NPs can be synthetically engineered to bypass the blood-brain barrier. One of the cardinal features of the blood-brain barrier is the tight junction that is formed between endothelial cells, restricting the passage of xeno biotics into the central nervous system (CNS). However, depending on their size and chemical composition, engineered NPs may bypass the BBB and gain direct entry into the brain (Lockman et al. 2004).
In the brain, microglia are immunocompetent cells and represent approximately 5-10% of the glial cell population. As the sentinels of the CNS, microglia are the first cells to respond to disruption of brain homeo stasis and entry of foreign particles or infectious agents. Once activated, microglia can undergo morphological and functional changes, including proliferation, migration to the site of injury, and phago cytosis of cellular debris. Activated microglia can also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and elicit an inflammatory response (Streit et al. 1999(Streit et al. , 2005Tambuyzer et al. 2009). Thus, microglia are the brain cells most likely to respond to the entry of NPs, and several studies have suggested this possibility (Kircher et al. 2003;Ribot et al. 2007;Voisin et al. 2007). Engineered NPs have been shown to trigger oxidative stress in vitro; because the brain is highly vulnerable to oxidative stress, increased ROS production can lead to neuro degeneration (Block et al. 2007;Long et al. 2007). One study showed that nano size titanium dioxide, commonly used in skincare products, stimulates the production of ROS in immortalized brain microglia and damages neurons in vitro (Long et al. 2007). Other studies suggest the plausible role of ultra fine particles found in air pollution in neuro inflammation and in the induction of pathology associated with Alzheimer's disease (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al. 2002. Silica is a major component of sand and glass, and it has been used in the synthesis of NPs. Silica NPs (SiNPs) are generally deemed non toxic and are inexpensive and easy to produce. Functional groups can also be added to the surface, making them appealing for designs for different applications Wang et al. 2008). SiNPs are being formulated for potential drug delivery and for imaging and diagnostic applications in the CNS because they are considered to be more bio compatible than are other imaging NPs, such as quantum dots, which may contain toxic metals such as cadmium and mercury Liu et al. 2008;Manzoor et al. 2009;Roy et al. 2005;Su et al. 2009). Studies have proposed microglia as a vehicle for the delivery of NPs to tumors for imaging or drug delivery Voisin et al. 2007).
Background: Silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are being formulated for cellular imaging and for nonviral gene delivery in the central nervous system (CNS), but it is unclear what potential effects SiNPs can elicit once they enter the CNS. As the resident macrophages of the CNS, microglia are the cells most likely to respond to SiNP entry into the brain. Upon activation, they are capable of undergoing morphological and functional changes. oBjective: We examined the effects of SiNP exposure using primary rat microglia. Methods: We observed microglial uptake of SiNPs using transmission electron and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Microglial functions, including phagocytosis, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), expression of pro inflammatory genes, and cytokine release, were measured after SiNP exposure at different concentrations. results: Microglia are capable of avidly taking up SiNPs at all concentrations tested. These same concentrations did not elicit cytotoxicity or a change in phagocytic activity. SiNPs did increase the productions of both intracellular ROS and RNS. We also observed a significant decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α gene expression at all concentrations tested and a significant increase in COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) gene expression at the highest concentration of SiNPs. Analysis of cytokine release showed a detectable level of interleukin-1β. conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating the in vitro effects of SiNPs in primary microglia. Our findings suggest that very low levels of SiNPs are capable of altering microglial function. Increased ROS and RNS production, changes in pro inflammatory genes, and cytokine release may not only adversely affect microglial function but also affect surrounding neurons. We synthesized the SiNPs used in this study using the Stöber method, which is known to generate amorphous SiNPs of a controlled size (Stöber et al. 1968). In addition, the SiNPs were embedded with a fluorescent dansyl amide dye, allowing them to be tracked in cells. The physico chemical properties of these particular SiNPs have been previously charac terized (Nyland et al. 2009). Incorporation of dansylamide dye molecules inside the silica matrix protects the dye from the surrounding environment and provides signal enhancement due to an increase in the number of dye molecules per NP without dye aggregations (Ow et al. 2005;Sokolov and Naik 2008). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy showed that these dansylamide-embedded SiNPs are not contaminated with other metals (Nyland et al. 2009). Another primary concern of testing the toxicity of NPs is the concept of NP aggregation, which can result in mis leading information. Thus, we tested these SiNPs for stability and for clumping in cell culture media using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering. These SiNPs were stable in cell culture media for approximately 1 week, and no clumping or aggregation was observed (Nyland et al. 2009;Thomassen et al. 2010). The goal of the present study was to determine whether these fluorescent SiNPs can be taken up by primary microglia from rat brain and to determine whether they disrupt microglial function.

Synthesis and characterization of SiNPs.
The NPs used in this study were formed in an emulsion where 0.5 g of the hydrophobic phase, high-molecular-weight poly(dimethylsiloxane) (Scientific Polymer Products, Ontario, NY), was dissolved in 2 mL of the sol-gel precursor tetraethyl orthosilicate (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI) and 70 mL ethanol (Aldrich), the hydrophilic phase. Then 0.05 g dansyl-amino propyltriethoxysilane (dansylamide dye; Gelest, Morrisville, PA) was added to the solution and ultimately became covalently bonded to the cross-linked silica network. Control experiments established that this networking was essential for retention of the dye inside the particles. After adding 10 mL ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH) to initiate the polymerization process, 0.4 g Dow 190 surfactant (silicone ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer; Dow Corning, Midland, MI) was added. The reaction was allowed to continue for 12 hr at room temperature. After the reaction was completed, NPs were washed with ethanol and deionized water to remove surfactant and then centrifuged five times. The NPs were finally resuspended in 100% ethanol. The final particle concentration was determined by averaging the number of counts in the field of view in 20 SEM images of a mono layer of 3.5 mg/mL NPs. The size, shape, and concentration of NPs (expressed as NPs per milli liter ethanol) were examined under SEM (JEOL 6700F) and an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis system (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA). Fluorescence of the dye-doped NPs was measured with a Hitachi F-4500 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Schaumberg, IL). The fluorescence emission of the dansylamidedoped NPs was at 460-480 nm, a wavelength detectable using fluorescence microscopy.
The dansylamide-embedded SiNPs were also characterized before treatment. Figure 1A is an SEM image of the dansylamide-embedded SiNPs suspended in culture media. The NPs are spherical in shape and about 150-200 nm in diameter. These SiNPs do not aggregate in cell culture media, and the dansylamide dye mole cules do not leak out as they are incorporated into the NP matrix. The size distribution and the surface charge of these SiNPs were measured by photon correlation spectroscopy using a Zetasizers 3000 (Malvern Instruments, Southborough, MA). The size distribution of these SiNPs ( Figure 1B) indicates the absence of aggregation. The overall surface charge of these SiNPs, determined by their zeta-potential values, is negative (-23 mV; Figure 1C) because of the hydroxyl groups on their surface.
Primary microglia cell culture. Primary mixed glial cell cultures were prepared using a modified version of the glial culture technique as previously described (Giulian and Baker 1986). Briefly, 9-10 brains from post natal day 1-3 Sprague-Dawley rat pups (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were dissected, and the meninges were carefully removed. Brain tissue was dissociated by trypsination (0.25% trypsin at 37°C for 30 min), trituration, and filtration through 40-µm cell strainers. Cells were centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 min, resuspended, and plated onto 75-cm 2 poly-l-lysine-coated culture flasks in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)/F12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), and 100 U penicillin/100 µg streptomycin (Invitrogen). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified chamber of 95% air/5% CO 2 for 12-14 days, when the glial cultures reached confluency. Microglia were then separated from the glial cultures by shaking the flasks for 2 hr at 200 rpm at 37°C and collected as floating cells in the media. After centrifugation (2,000 × g for 10 min), cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion, and cells were plated on 96-well plates, 6-well plates, or 60-mm dishes, depending on the assay being tested. Non adherent cells were removed 20 min after plating by changing the culture medium to DMEM/F12 containing 2% FBS. Adherent cells were incubated overnight before being used for experiments. More than 95% of the adherent cells were positive for microglia-specific marker Mac-1 (Chemicon, Billerica, MA) as determined by immuno staining. Figure 2 shows an image of primary microglia in culture prior to treatment. The animals used for this study were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering. All the animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Experimental conditions for SiNP treatments. We used a series of SiNP concentrations to test possible effects on primary microglia. The SiNP stock solution (concentrations ranging from 4 × 10 10 NPs/mL to 7 × 10 10 NPs/mL) was diluted in 100% ethanol to the appropriate concentrations (shown in Table 1), and the NPs were added to DMEM/F12 medium containing 2% FBS; ethanol content in the solutions was < 1%. Microglia were exposed to SiNPs for 24 hr before being assayed. In some experiments, bacterial lipo poly saccharide (LPS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used as a positive control to assess microglial function. Table 1 shows the conversions of the NPs/volume concentrations used in this study to mass/volume. The concentrations we used were similar to or less than the concentrations used in previously published in vivo NP studies (He et al. 2008;Lockman et al. 2004). Cell viability. Cell viability was determined using Promega CellTiter 96 AQ ueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay {MTS [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3 carboxymethoxy phenyl)-2-( 4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt]; Promega, Madison, WI} according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 30,000 microglia/well were plated onto 96-well plates. Four hours before the end of the exposure, MTS was added, and at the end of exposure, the plate was read at 490 nm.
Measurement of ROS. We measured ROS using the 2´,7´-dichlorohydrofluorescein diacetate (H 2 DCFDA) assay (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Nonfluorescent H2DCFDA readily crosses the cell membranes and gets deacetylated to H 2 DCF by intracellular esterases. After oxidation by ROS, H 2 DCF is converted to the highly fluorescent DCF, which is detectable using a fluorescent plate reader. A 2.5-mM stock solution of DCF-DA was first made in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) and then diluted in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) so that the percentage DMSO in solution was < 1%. A total of 30,000 microglia/well was plated onto a 96-well plate. After 24-hr exposure, culture medium was removed and the cells were washed in HBSS. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in HBSS containing 10 µM DCF-DA. After incubation, medium was aspirated and the cells were washed twice with HBSS. The plate was read at 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission.

Measurement of RNS.
We measured RNS using the 4-amino-5-methylamino-2´,7´-difluoro fluorescein (DAF-FM) assay (Invitrogen). DAF-FM readily crosses the cell membranes and is deacetylated by intra cellular esterases to 4,5-diaminofluorescein (DAF-2). DAF-2 remains essentially non fluorescent until it reacts with the nitrosonium cation (produced by spontaneous oxidation of nitric oxide) to form a fluorescent benzo triazole, which is detectable using a fluorescent plate reader. A 5-mM stock of DAF-FM was first made in DMSO and then diluted in HBSS so that the percentage DMSO in solution was < 1%. We plated 30,000 microglia/well onto a 96-well plate. After 24-hr exposure, culture medium was removed and the cells were washed in HBSS. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in HBSS containing 1 µM DAF-FM. After incubation, medium was aspirated and the cells were washed twice with HBSS. The plate was read at 495 nm excitation and 515 nm emission.
Phagocytosis. We measured microglial phagocytosis using fluorescent poly styrene micro beads (1 µm diameter; Molecular Probes). The emission wavelength for these beads is 598 nm, which does not overlap with the fluorescence of the SiNPs. A stock solution of 1 × 10 10 beads/mL was diluted in HBSS to generate a solution of 50-100 fluorescent poly styrene beads per cell. We then plated 30,000 microglia/well onto a 96-well plate. After 24-hr exposure, medium was aspirated, and cells were washed and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in HBSS containing the fluorescent poly styrene beads. After incubation and washing, the plate was read at 570 nm excitation and 598 nm emission.
SiNP uptake using fluorescence confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We plated 250,000 primary microglia/well onto 6-well plates with a glass coverslip per well. After 24-hr exposure, microglial cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (15 min at room temperature) followed by 0.2% Triton (10 min at room temperature). The cells were then blocked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% normal goat serum for 1 hr at room temperature before being incubated with mouse anti-Mac-1 primary antibody (1:100; Chemicon) overnight at 4°C. After three washes in PBS, the cells were incubated with goat anti-mouse Alexa 594 secondary anti body (1:500; Invitrogen). After three final washes in PBS, the cells were mounted with Prolong with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2phenyl indole; Invitrogen) to counter stain for the nuclei. Fluorescence confocal images were taken using Zeiss LSM510-Meta (Carl Zeiss Microimaging Inc., Thornwood, NY) at the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Medicine Microscope Facility.
For TEM, we plated 250,000 primary microglia/well per treatment onto 35-mm dishes. After 24-hr exposure, cells were washed and fixed in 2% glutaldehyde. The samples were then sent to the JHU School of Medicine Microscope Facility for electron microscopy preparation. TEM images were taken using a Hitachi 7600 TEM.
Cytokine production profiling using Luminex (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX). For profiling of cytokine production, we plated 30,000 primary microglia/well onto a 96-well plate. After 24-hr exposure, 50 µL of the culture medium was collected to be assayed for 10 different cytokines [granulocyte/ macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)] using the Cytokine Rat 10-Plex Panel (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. (qRT-PCR). We plated 500,000 primary microglia per treatment onto 60-mm dishes. After 24-hr exposure, total RNA was isolated from each plate using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quality of RNA was tested using an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Quantum Analytics, Inc., Foster City, CA). We used 50 ng total RNA for reverse transcription using the Sensiscript RT Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions. The final cDNA product was diluted to a final volume of 100 µL, and 5 µL of cDNA per gene of interest was used for qRT-PCR, which was performed using the Applied Biosystems Real-Time PCR 7000 Sequence Detection System with Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix and rat TNF-α [GenBank accession no. NM_012675.2 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/)] and rat cyclo oxygenase-2 (COX-2; GenBank accession no. NM_017232.3) Taqman primers (all from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). β-Actin was used as the internal control for these experiments. qRT-PCR analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method.

Statistical analysis.
Values are expressed as mean ± SE. Each group consisted of three or four independent trials for each concentration studied. We used a one-way analysis of variance to determine treatment effect followed by Fisher's post hoc analysis.

Results
Uptake of SiNP by primary microglia. We exposed primary microglia to various concentrations of SiNPs for 24 hr. Confocal fluorescent microscopy showed the internalization of SiNPs by microglia at all concentrations tested (Figure 3). At the highest concentration, 40,000 NPs/µL (equivalent to 7.28 µg/mL), nearly every microglia showed uptake of SiNPs. At this concentration, primary microglia looked hyper trophic compared with lower concentrations ( Figure 3C). We also detected uptake of SiNPs by TEM. At 4 NPs/µL (7.28 × 10 -4 µg/mL), SiNPs were present within the cytoplasm but did not appear to accumulate in phagocytic vacuoles ( Figures 4B, 5B). In contrast, at 400 NPs/µL (7.28 × 10 -2 µg/mL; Figures 4C, 5C) and 40,000 NPs/µL (7.28 µg/ mL; Figures 4D, 5D), SiNPs were present in what appear to be phagocytic vacuoles. Analysis of the diameter of SiNPs in the cytoplasm and in phagocytic vacuoles of microglia ( Figure 5B-D) is consistent with the known distribution of the diameter for most of the SiNPs, which is approximately 150-200 nm ( Figure 1B).
Cell viability and phagocytosis. We examined whether SiNPs are cytotoxic to microglia, by measuring cell viability using the MTS assay. We used LPS, a potent inflammagen, as a positive control because it is a well-known activator of microglia (Facchinetti et al. 2003;Minghetti and Levi 1995). After a 24-hr exposure to SiNPs, we observed no significant difference in cell viability at any of the SiNP concentrations tested relative to the vehicle control ( Figure 6). However, LPS generated a positive response compared with vehicle and all the SiNP concentrations tested (F 7,19 = 32.67; p = 0.0001), which may be related to an effect of LPS on microglial proliferation.
To determine whether SiNPs can alter phagocytic activity, we exposed primary microglia to SiNPs for 24 hr before the addition of fluorescent poly styrene micro spheres, which are commonly used to assess phagocytic (B) Microglia exposed to 4 NPs/µL; SiNPs were dispersed throughout the cytoplasm (magnification, 5,000x). (C) Microglia exposed to 400 NPs/µL; there was uptake of SiNPs into what it appears to be phagocytic vacuoles (arrow; magnification, 8,000x). (D) Microglia exposed to the highest concentration tested (40,000 NPs/µL); numerous phagocytic vacuoles contained SiNPs (magnification, 6,000x).
2 µm 2 µm 2 µm 2 µm activity. The microspheres are detected at a different wavelength (emission at 598 nm) than the SiNPs (emission at 460-480 nm), so SiNP fluorescence does not interfere with this phagocytic activity assay. Figure 7 shows that SiNPs did not produce a significant effect on microglial phagocytic activity (F 3,8 = 0.775; p = 0.540). We also tested phago cytosis at an earlier time point of SiNP exposure (i.e., 30 min), and did not observe a difference in phagocytic activity (data not shown). In summary, SiNPs at the concentrations tested were not cytotoxic to primary microglia, nor did they alter phagocytosis.

Production of ROS and RNS.
Although cell viability was not altered by SiNPs, we were interested in determining whether SiNPs could induce the production of intra cellular ROS and RNS. It is known that, upon activation, microglia are capable of generating both ROS and RNS. After 24 hr exposure to SiNPs, we observed a consistent and significant increase in intra cellular production of ROS (F 4,11 = 8.47; p = 0.0023; Figure 8A) and RNS (F 4,11 = 9.85; p = 0.0012; Figure 8B). These increased levels of intra cellular ROS and RNS were present even at the lowest concentration tested, and were similar to the level produced by 100 ng/mL LPS (Figure 8).

Gene expression of pro inflammatory markers.
To determine if exposure to SiNPs can induce an inflammatory response in primary microglia, we measured the levels of the proinflammatory genes TNF-α and COX-2 using qRT-PCR. After 24 hr of SiNP exposure, we observed a significant decrease in TNF-α gene expression at all concentrations tested (F 4,12 = 79.27; p = 0.0001) and a significant increase in COX-2 gene expression at the highest concentration of 200,000 NPs/ µL (36.4 µg/mL of SiNPs; (F 4,10 = 43.30; p = 0.0001) (Figure 9).
Cytokine release. We examined the effect of SiNPs on the release of inflammatory cytokines, using Luminex technology, which can simultaneously measure 10 different cytokines. Under the conditions used, we measured low but detectable levels of IL-1β after SiNP exposure. In contrast, IL-1β was not detectable in the culture medium from vehicle-exposed microglia. Microglia treated with 100 ng/mL LPS served as a positive control, and this treatment resulted in a robust increase in IL-1β release ( Figure 10).

Discussion
In this article we provide in vitro evidence for the effects of SiNPs on primary microglia from rat brain. Using both TEM and fluorescence confocal microscopy, we found that primary microglia can take up SiNPs when exposed to very low concentrations (as low as 4 NPs/µL, or 7.28 × 10 -4 µg/mL). Although these SiNPs do not exert acute cyto toxicity at the concentrations tested or alter phagocytic activity of microglia, SiNPs did increase intra cellular ROS and RNS levels. Previous studies have shown that intra cellular ROS acts as a signal that stimulates the production of inflammatory markers (Pei et al. 2007;Wang et al. 2004). This is consistent with our observation that microglia exposed to SiNPs released detectable levels of IL-1β. We also observed a consistent decrease in TNF-α gene expression at all SiNP concentrations and a significant increase in COX-2 gene expression at the highest concentration. We do not yet understand the reason for the decrease in TNF-α gene expression. A change in COX-2 activity may be involved. Previous studies have shown that enhanced COX-2 activity and subsequent increase in prostaglandins such as PGE 2 (prosta glandin E 2 ) has a negative feedback in TNF-α (Aloisi et al. 1999;Levi et al. 1998;Zhang and Rivest 2001). PGE 2 might exert this effect by increasing the level of intra cellular cAMP because the effect of PGE 2 on down-regulating TNF-α was mimicked by cAMP-elevating agents (Minghetti et al. 1997). However, this is only speculative, and future studies are needed to examine this possibility.
An interesting observation from this study is that at the lowest concentration (4 NPs/µL; 7.28 × 10 -4 µg/mL), the SiNPs did not appear to be localized in phagocytic vacuoles but were dispersed throughout the cytoplasm. In contrast, at higher concentrations, SiNPs appeared to be engulfed in phagocytic vacuoles. This suggests different mechanisms of SiNP uptake based on SiNP concentration. Future studies will examine the effects of concentration, size, and surface modification of SiNPs on primary microglial uptake and function, because smaller SiNPs with a higher surface area can elicit a greater dose-dependent cytotoxicity than larger NPs (Lin et al. 2006;Napierska et al. 2009;Shvedova et al. 2007).
This study provides important insights on possible adverse effects on primary microglia exposed to SiNPs in vitro. The results can guide experimental animal studies in which SiNPs are administered in vivo. This is an important next step because reports have demonstrated the use of SiNPs for drug delivery into the CNS without assessing potential toxic effects. Our present results showed the effects of only 24-hr exposures to SiNPs. However, if SiNPs are not readily degradable or eliminated from the CNS, then it is probable that SiNPs would accumulate in the brain, leading to an exacerbation of the microglial responses observed in this study.

Conclusion
This is the first report of effects of SiNPs on primary microglia. The main effect observed is increased production of intra cellular ROS and RNS, altered TNF-α and COX-2 gene expression, and a small but detectable release of IL-1β. Other studies have suggested that microglia can internalize SiNPs and be used as a vehicle for gene therapy and as a contrast agent for glioma treatment (Kircher et al. 2003;Ribot et al. 2007;Voisin et al. 2007). Although this approach may advance the field of nano medicine, little is known about the possible adverse effects of SiNPs once they have been internalized by microglia in the brain parenchyma. Our study suggests that at concentrations as low as 4 NPs/µL (7.28 × 10 -4 µg/mL), there is a significant increase of ROS and RNS. Because NPs may gain entry into the brain via multiple pathways, it is possible that microglia may be affected in both supra tentorial and infratentorial regions of the brain. This could cause deleterious effects, because the continuous production of ROS by microglia is capable of damaging neurons in their vicinity. Moreover, SiNP-induced microglial dysfunction can lead to their inability to maintain neuronal health. Figure 9. Effects of SiNPs on inflammatory gene expression of TNF-α and COX-2 meas ured by qRT-PCR. Data are normalized to vehicle and expressed as mean ± SE of three independent trials. *p < 0.05 compared with vehicle and 100 ng/mL LPS of three independent trials. # p < 0.05 compared with all treatments.