Skip to content

Environmental Health Perspectives

Facebook Page EHP Twitter Feed Open Access icon  

Research September 2017 | Volume 125 | Issue 9

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/EHP1878

Effects of Orally Ingested Arsenic on Respiratory Epithelial Permeability to Bacteria and Small Molecules in Mice

Michael W. Henderson,1* Jennifer H. Madenspacher,1 Gregory S. Whitehead,1 Seddon Y. Thomas,1 Jim J. Aloor,1† Kymberly M. Gowdy,2 and Michael B. Fessler1
Author Affiliations open

1Immunity, Inflammation, and Disease Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA

PDF icon PDF Version (3.9 MB)

  • Background:
    Arsenic exposure via drinking water impacts millions of people worldwide. Although arsenic has been associated epidemiologically with increased lung infections, the identity of the lung cell types targeted by peroral arsenic and the associated immune mechanisms remain poorly defined.
    Objectives:
    We aimed to determine the impact of peroral arsenic on pulmonary antibacterial host defense.
    Methods:
    Female C57BL/6 mice were administered drinking water with 0, 250 ppb, or 25 ppm sodium arsenite for 5 wk and then challenged intratracheally with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or lipopolysaccharide. Bacterial clearance and immune responses were profiled.
    Results:
    Arsenic had no effect on bacterial clearance in the lung or on the intrapulmonary innate immune response to bacteria or lipopolysaccharide, as assessed by neutrophil recruitment to, and cytokine induction in, the airspace. Alveolar macrophage TNFα production was unaltered. By contrast, arsenic-exposed mice had significantly reduced plasma TNFα in response to systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge, together suggesting that the local airway innate immune response may be relatively preserved from arsenic intoxication. Despite intact intrapulmonary bacterial clearance during pneumonia, arsenic-exposed mice suffered dramatically increased bacterial dissemination to the bloodstream. Mechanistically, this was linked to increased respiratory epithelial permeability, as revealed by intratracheal FITC-dextran tracking, serum Club Cell protein 16 measurement, and other approaches. Consistent with barrier disruption at the alveolar level, arsenic-exposed mice had evidence for alveolar epithelial type 1 cell injury.
    Conclusions:
    Peroral arsenic has little effect on local airway immune responses to bacteria but compromises respiratory epithelial barrier integrity, increasing systemic translocation of inhaled pathogens and small molecules. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1878
  • Received: 09 March 2017
    Revised: 14 August 2017
    Accepted: 16 August 2017
    Published: 28 September 2017

    Address correspondence to M.B. Fessler, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 T.W. Alexander Dr., P.O. Box 12233, Maildrop D2-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3701. Email: fesslerm@niehs.nih.gov

    *Current address: UNC School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB7035, Genetic Medicine Building, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.

    Current address: East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute, Dept. of Physiology, East Carolina University, ECHI 4101C, Greenville, North Carolina 27834.

    The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

    Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Introduction

Arsenic is a naturally occurring metalloid found in soil, water, and air that has been linked to the development of a wide range of human cancers (i.e., lung, bladder, liver, skin, kidney), as well as cardiovascular disease and other nonmalignant disorders (Hughes et al. 2011). Although occupational exposure to arsenic may occur via inhalation, it is thought that the major route of exposure, involving
>140 million people worldwide, is via drinking water due to natural contamination of groundwater with inorganic arsenic from the earth’s crust (Hughes et al. 2011; States et al. 2011). Although comparatively a much larger problem in countries such as Bangladesh, Chile, India, and Taiwan where arsenic concentrations >1 ppm have been documented in drinking water, arsenic was ranked first on the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s 2015 “Priority List of Hazardous Substances” (https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/) due to elevated levels at several locations in the United States.

In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the lung as a uniquely susceptible target organ for arsenic ingested via the oral route. In addition to lung cancer (Celik et al. 2008; D’Ippoliti et al. 2015; Smith et al. 2009), epidemiologic studies have associated arsenic exposure via drinking water with decreased lung function (Das et al. 2014; Dauphiné et al. 2011; Parvez et al. 2013; Recio-Vega et al. 2015; von Ehrenstein et al. 2005), respiratory symptoms and signs (Mazumder et al. 2000; Parvez et al. 2010; Steinmaus et al. 2016), pneumonia (George et al. 2015; Rahman et al. 2011), bronchiectasis (Mazumder et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2006), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (D’Ippoliti et al. 2015). Although the underlying mechanisms have remained somewhat obscure, studies in rodent models have shown that the lung has substantial arsenic metabolizing capacity through arsenite methyltransferase (Healy et al. 1998), that some methylated arsenic species are preferentially distributed to the lung (Hughes et al. 2003; Kenyon et al. 2005), and that oral arsenic alters pulmonary gene expression (Andrew et al. 2007; Boellmann et al. 2010; Kozul et al. 2009b) and induces DNA single strand breaks selectively in the lung (Yamanaka et al. 1989). Toxic effects of arsenic on respiratory epithelial cells and macrophages have been identified in vitro. However, little work to date has been done in vivo to identify specific cell types in the lung targeted by arsenic and the associated effects on pulmonary immune responses to the environment.

Here, our objective was to define the effect of orally ingested arsenic upon antibacterial host defense in the lung. Mice were exposed to arsenic by drinking water for 5 wk and then challenged intratracheally with bacteria or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The intrapulmonary innate immune response was quantified. Bacterial burden was quantified in the lung in order to assess local microbial clearance, and in blood and spleen in order to assess extrapulmonary bacterial dissemination. Permeability of the respiratory epithelium to endogenous airspace proteins was assessed through the measurement of plasma Club Cell protein 16 (CC16). Permeability of the respiratory epithelium to exogenous small molecules was evaluated through measuring translocation of FITC-dextran from airspace to plasma.

Methods

Reagents

Sodium arsenite was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) was from GibcoTM (Gaithersburg, MD). Fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA) was used in cell culture studies.

Animals and Arsenic Dosing

Female, 8-wk-old C57BL/6 mice weighing 18–22 g were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and used in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals after review by the NIEHS Animal Care and Use Committee. Female mice were used in order to facilitate group housing and group exposure. Animals were treated humanely with due consideration to the alleviation of distress and discomfort. Four liter volumes of drinking water were freshly prepared with 250 μg/L (ppb) or 25 mg/L (ppm) sodium arsenite every 2 wk for ad libitum consumption. Mice consumed 2–5 mL of arsenic-containing water (or water control) daily for ∼5 wk prior to experimentation. In most studies, mice were fed NIH-31 chow. For a subset of studies, mice were fed AIN-93M diet (D10012M; Research Diets, Inc.; New Brunswick, NJ) for 2 wk prior to and during the 5-wk arsenic drinking water exposure.

In Vivo Bacterial Exposures

Klebsiella pneumoniae [ATCC 43816; 2,000 CFU (colony-forming units)] or Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 6303; 6.5−9×105 CFU) were delivered to the lung via oropharyngeal aspiration while the mice were under 4% isoflurane anesthesia, as previously reported (Madenspacher and Fessler 2016). In other experiments, K. pneumoniae (960, 6,200, or 92,000 CFU) was injected intravenously (i.v.), and tissues were collected 4 or 18 h later. Splenic homogenate and whole blood were serially diluted and plated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates for K. pneumoniae or TSA with 5% sheep’s blood for S. pneumoniae and incubated overnight for bacterial quantification.

In Vivo LPS Exposures

Mice were exposed to aerosolized Escherichia coli 0111:B4 LPS (300 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min, as previously reported (Draper et al. 2010; Smoak et al. 2008). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected immediately after euthanasia. BALF was centrifuged to pellet cells, and the supernatant was collected and frozen at −80°C prior to analysis. Cell count and differential calculation was performed using Wright’s stain. Alternatively, mice were injected i.p. with 0.5 mg/kg LPS for serum cytokine analysis.

Immunoblotting

BALF was collected as previously described (Draper et al. 2010). 400 μL of BALF was centrifuged (100,000 g, 2 h, 4°C), and the pellet was resuspended in 65 μL Laemmli sample buffer with 50 mM DTT and boiled for 8 min. Samples were run on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose using standard methods. The membrane was probed with anti-T1α/podoplanin antibody (AF3244; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and detection performed with a secondary antibody labeled at 800 nm (LiCor, Lincoln, NE) and an Odyssey Fc (LiCor). Quantification was performed using ImageStudio 5.0 (LiCor).

Flow Cytometry

Lungs were digested with porcine elastase (4.5U; E7885, Roche Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO) and 100 U/mL DNase I (Catalog No. 79254; Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Cells in suspension were then filtered and processed. Pacific Blue/V450 streptavidin-conjugated (Catalog No. 560797; BD Biosciences, San Jose CA) secondary antibody was used to label cells after staining with biotinylated antibodies against CD45 (Catalog No. 553078; BD Biosciences), CD31 (Catalog No. 558737; BD Biosciences), and CD34 (Catalog No. 119304; BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Cells were also stained with APC (allophycocyanin)-conjugated rat anti-mouse EpCAM (Catalog No. 17-5791-82; eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and 7-aminoactinomycin D (Catalog No. A1310; Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Cell isolation was performed using a FACS Aria II (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Epithelial cells were defined as CD31CD34CD45 (i.e., Lin), EpCAM+.

FITC–Dextran Permeability Analysis

Small-molecule permeability of the respiratory epithelial barrier was assayed using a modification of a reported method (Chen et al. 2014). FITC–dextran (3,000 MW; D3305, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was dissolved in sterile saline and introduced to the airspace via oropharyngeal aspiration (55 μL, 5 mg/kg). After 1 h, mice were euthanized via intraperitoneal (i.p.) sodium pentobarbital injection, and blood was collected by cardiac puncture into ETDA-containing plasma separation tubes (BD). Serial dilutions of plasma were loaded into 96-well plates and analyzed for fluorescence intensity using a BioTek Synergy (Winooski, VT) plate reader and 485/528 nm filter.

RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR

RNA was isolated by RNEasy kit (Qiagen). Complementary DNAs (cDNA) were generated from 500 ng of purified RNA using TaqMan reverse transcription reagents from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed in triplicate with Taqman PCR Mix (Applied Biosystems) in the HT7900 ABI sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Predesigned primers for Claudin-3 (Mm00515499_s1) and Claudin-18 (Mm00517321_m1) were purchased from Life Technologies. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) (Mm99999915_g1).

Protein Measurement

TNFα ELISA was from BioLegend (San Diego, CA). ELISAs for IgM (immunoglobulin M) and albumin were from Bethyl. CC16 ELISA was from Novatein Biosciences (Woburn, MA). All ELISAs were conducted per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Typing and Enumeration

Blood samples were analyzed using the HEMAVET 1700 hematology analyzer (Drew Scientific, Dallas, TX). Manual WBC (white blood cell) differential counts were reported and smear estimates used for confirmation.

Histology

Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, trimmed, processed for paraffin embedding, sectioned (5 μm), and stained with hematoxylin & eosin. The slides were scanned using an Aperio AT2 slide scanner (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and images were captured using Aperio ImageScope.

Statistical Analysis

Experiments were conducted using six mice per treatment condition and were repeated two to three times except where indicated in figure legends. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6.0 software (Graphpad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparisons of more than two groups, or Mantel-Cox log-rank analysis (survival). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

Effects of Oral Arsenic on Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Bacterial Burden following Intratracheal Challenge

Arsenic has been associated with increased rates of pneumonia and with lung diseases such as bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, and COPD that are characterized by chronic or recurrent bacterial lung infection (D’Ippoliti et al. 2015; George et al. 2015; Mazumder et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2011). Given this, we hypothesized that arsenic may compromise pulmonary host defense and reasoned that a murine model of bacterial pneumonia might provide insight into the underlying mechanisms. To our knowledge, the only studies to date that have tested the effect of peroral arsenic on lung infection in vivo have been in the specific setting of influenza A, where reduced viral clearance from the lung has been noted (Kozul et al. 2009a; Ramsey et al. 2013).

In preliminary studies, we exposed C57BL/6 mice for 5 wk to drinking water with 0, 250 ppb, or 25 ppm sodium arsenite and then profiled immune cell populations in the airspace. No significant change was noted upon hematoxylin & eosin staining of the lungs of arsenic-exposed mice (Figure 1a–c). Mice exposed to 25 ppm but not 250 ppb of arsenic had a modest increase in airway total leukocyte count that was driven by an increase in alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes (Figure 1d, e).

Figures 1a, 1b, and 1c are photomicrographs. Figure 1d plots WBC counts (times 10 superscript 3) (y-axis) when exposed to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm sodium arsenite (x-axis). Figure 1e is a bar graph plotting macrophage, lymphocyte, and PMN counts (times 10 superscript 3; y-axis) when exposed to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm sodium arsenite. Figures 1f and 1g plot K. pneumoniae burden (log CFU per milliliter) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm sodium arsenite in the lung, blood, and spleen samples (x-axis). Figure 1h plots S. pneumoniae burden (log CFU per milliliter) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm sodium arsenite in the lung, blood, and spleen samples (x-axis). Figure 1i is a line graph plotting percentage of survival of mice (y-axis) at days 0 to 13 after K. pneumoniae inoculation (x-axis) in mice exposed to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm sodium arsenite. Standard errors of the mean are also plotted for Figures 1a to 1i.

Figure 1. Intrapulmonary compartmentalization of bacteria following oral arsenic exposure. (a–c) Mice were exposed to 0 (a), 250 ppb (b), or 25 ppm (c) sodium arsenite via drinking water for 5 wk, and then lung histopathology was evaluated after hematoxylin and eosin staining. Results shown are representative of six mice per treatment. (d, e) BAL total WBC (d); and macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils (PMN) (e) were counted in C57BL/6 mice after a 5-wk exposure to drinking water with 0, 250 ppb, or 25 ppm sodium arsenite (n=6/treatment, representative of three independent experiments). (f) Mice exposed as in (d) were infected i.t. with 2,000 CFU K. pneumoniae. 24 h post-infection, bacterial burden was quantified in lung, blood, and splenic homogenate (n=23–30/treatment/tissue). (g) The study design in f was repeated, except mice were fed AIN-93M low-arsenic diet instead of NIH-31 chow (mice in all panels other than this were fed NIH-31) (n=12–24/treatment/tissue). (h) Mice exposed to water conditions shown were infected i.t. with ∼1×106 CFU S. pneumoniae, and then bacteria were quantified in the indicated tissues 24 h later (n=6/treatment, representative of two independent experiments). (i) Survival was monitored following i.t. inoculation with 360 CFU K. pneumoniae in mice exposed to arsenic or tap water as shown (n=10/treatment, repeated twice). Note: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CFU, colony-forming units; i.t., intratracheal; PMN, neutrophil; WBC, white blood cell. Data shown are mean±SEM. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001, ψ p=0.058.

We next challenged 5-wk arsenic-exposed mice intratracheally (i.t.) with the clinically relevant Gram-negative bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae (Draper et al. 2010) and quantified bacteria in the lung and peripheral tissues. Arsenic had no effect on bacterial burden in the lung 24 h post-infection (Figure 1f), suggesting that it does not compromise pathogen killing in the airspace. Despite this, mice from both arsenic groups had markedly increased bacterial counts in blood and spleen (Figure 1f), indicating increased extrapulmonary bacterial dissemination. Consistent with our prior findings (Madenspacher and Fessler 2016), a substantial number of mice had no detectable extrapulmonary bacterial dissemination 24 h post-infection with K. pneumoniae, consistent with an as-yet unbreached alveolocapillary barrier. Consistent with the accelerated escape of bacteria from the arsenic-exposed lung, bacteremia was detected in 8/29 (0), 18/29 (250 ppb), and 23/29 (25 ppm) mice, and splenic bacteria were detected in 18/29 (0), 24/29 (0 ppb), and 25/27 (25 ppm) mice.

Given that our standard facility chow (NIH-31) was determined to have a total arsenic concentration of ∼340 ppb, we repeated the K. pneumoniae infection studies, substituting in the purified AIN-93M diet, which has <50 ppb arsenic (vendor data). As shown in Figure 1g, similar results, namely, increased extrapulmonary bacteria but unchanged pulmonary bacterial burden, were also found on the low-arsenic diet. Given this, all subsequent studies were conducted using NIH-31 chow.

In order to assess the generalizability of our findings to other bacterial pathogens, we next challenged arsenic-exposed and control mice i.t. with the Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae. Although a much more modest effect and only statistically significant in the blood at 25 ppm, a similar finding of increased extrapulmonary bacterial burden was also noted (Figure 1h).

Given the enhanced extrapulmonary spread of bacteria we questioned whether arsenic exposure might reduce survival during pneumonia with the pathogen K. pneumoniae. Although a relative reduction in survival was noted in both arsenic groups starting after 5 d of pneumonia, this was not statistically significant (Figure 1i). Taken together, peroral arsenic exposure compromises compartmentalization of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria to the infected airspace during pneumonia but does not significantly reduce survival in this setting.

Effects of Oral Arsenic on Innate Immune Responses in Lung and Systemic Circulation

To more directly evaluate whether peroral arsenic alters the local innate immune response within the lung, we next evaluated leukocyte recruitment to the airspace 24 h post-infection. Neutrophils (PMNs) are rapidly recruited from the circulation to the infected airway by cytokines and chemokines produced by alveolar macrophages (Draper et al. 2010). In addition to playing a critical role in pathogen killing, PMNs cause bystander injury to the respiratory epithelium and thereby increase permeability of the alveolocapillary barrier (Zemans et al. 2009). Arsenic exposure did not alter recruitment of total leukocytes (Figure 2a) or PMNs (Figure 2b) to the K. pneumoniae-infected airway. Similar findings were noted after lung infection with S. pneumoniae (Figure 2c). Histopathologically, K. pneumoniae delivered to the lung via oropharyngeal aspiration induced sparse, patchy neutrophilic infiltration, but there was no overt effect of arsenic on either the severity or nature of histological pneumonia (Figure 3). Together, this indicates that the acute cellular immune response in the airspace to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria is unaltered by peroral arsenic, and also suggests that the excess bacterial dissemination in arsenic-exposed mice is unlikely to arise from increased cell-mediated inflammatory injury in the infected lung.

Figures 2a and 2b, respectively, plot BAL WBCs (times 10 superscript 3) and BAL PMN (times 10 superscript 3) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic (x-axis) in K. pneumoniae. Figure 2c plots BAL WBCs times 10 superscript 5 (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic (x-axis) in S. pneumoniae. Standard errors of the mean are plotted for Figures 2a to 2c.
Figure 2. Leukocyte recruitment to the infected lung following oral arsenic exposure. Mice exposed for 5 wk to drinking water with the indicated arsenic content were infected i.t. with K. pneumoniae (a, b) or S. pneumoniae (c). BAL WBCs and PMNs were quantified 24 h post-infection as shown. Note: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; i.t., intratracheal; PMN, neutrophil; WBC, white blood cell. Data shown are mean±SEM. Data in a, b derive from n=6/treatment and are representative of two independent experiments. Data in c derive from n=12/treatment.
Figures 3a, 3b, and 3c are photomicrographs.
Figure 3. Lung histopathology during pneumonia following oral arsenic exposure. Mice were exposed to 0 (a), 250 ppb (b), or 25 ppm (c) sodium arsenite via drinking water for 5 wk and then infected in the lungs with 2,000 CFU K. pneumoniae via oropharyngeal aspiration. Twenty-four hours post-infection, lungs were fixed and stained with hematoxylin & eosin; lungs from three mice/condition are shown and are representative of n=6/condition. Patchy, focal consolidative infiltration of neutrophils was observed in all mice. Note: CFU, colony-forming units. Scale bar applies to all lungs shown; insets are 20× original.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a glycolipid of the outer cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria that triggers the innate immune response by activating Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) (Rosadini and Kagan 2017). LPS inhalation has been used widely to model the early kinetics of the innate immune response of the lung (Draper et al. 2010). We found that arsenic had no effect on recruitment of either total leukocytes (Figure 4a) or PMNs (Figure 4b) to the LPS-exposed lung. The concentration of TNFα in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of LPS-exposed mice was also unaltered by arsenic (Figure 4c). Further indicating that peroral arsenic has no overt effect on the local innate immune response of the airspace, alveolar macrophages harvested from arsenic-exposed and control mice after LPS inhalation generated equivalent TNFα ex vivo (Figure 4d). Collectively, peroral arsenic has no substantial effect on infection-induced leukocyte recruitment nor local TNFα induction within the inflamed airspace.

Figures 4a and 4b plot, respectively, BAL WBC (times 10 superscript 3) and BAL PMN (times 10 superscript 3) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic (x-axis) in LPS. The standard errors of the mean are also plotted. Figures 4c, 4d, and 4e are bar graphs with standard error of the mean plotting, respectively, BALF TNF alpha in picograms per milliliter, TNF alpha in picograms per milliliter, and plasma TNF alpha in picograms per milliliter (y-axis) in LPS, alveolar macrophage, and intraperitoneal LPS after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic (x-axis). Figure 4f plots plasma TNF alpha in picograms per milliliter (y-axis) as exposed to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic (x-axis) in K. pneumoniae. Standard errors of the mean are also plotted.
Figure 4. Intrapulmonary and systemic innate immune responses following oral arsenic exposure. (a–c) Mice maintained for 5 wk on drinking water with the indicated arsenic content were exposed to aerosolized LPS (300 μg/mL, 30 min). BAL total WBCs (a) and PMNs (b) were measured 24 h post-LPS, and BALF TNFα (c) was measured 2 h post-LPS. n=6/treatment; representative of two independent experiments. (d) Mice were treated with drinking water and inhaled LPS as in c, except that alveolar macrophages were lavaged 2 h post-LPS and then cultured overnight, after which time the culture media was assayed by ELISA for TNFα. n=12/treatment. (e) Mice were exposed to the indicated drinking water for 5 wk, injected i.p. with 0.5 mg/kg LPS, and then sacrificed for plasma TNFα measurement 90 min post-LPS. n=6/treatment. (f) Plasma TNFα was measured 24 h post-lung infection with K. pneumoniae in mice that had been exposed to the indicated drinking water conditions for 5 wk. n=6/treatment. Note: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; i.p., intraperitoneal; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PMN, neutrophil; WBC, white blood cell. Data shown are mean±SEM. *p<0.05; **p<0.0001.

Next, to determine whether our findings were specific to the lung, we administered LPS via the i.p. route, a model of systemic sepsis. Intraperitoneal LPS triggers rapid induction of plasma cytokines that are thought largely to derive from splenic and hepatic macrophages (Vollmar et al. 1996), cells that, unlike airspace macrophages, are directly exposed to portal venous drainage from the intestinal tract prior to first-pass metabolism. Of interest, we found a marked arsenic dose-dependent reduction in i.p. LPS-induced plasma TNFα (Figure 4e). Given the increased bacteremia in arsenic-exposed mice during lung infection with K. pneumoniae (Figure 1f), we also measured plasma TNFα in this setting as a readout of the systemic immune response to exacerbated sepsis. Mice exposed to 25 ppm arsenic exhibited a dramatic increase in plasma TNFα compared with controls (Figure 4f).

Effects of Oral Arsenic on Intravascular Clearance of Bacteria and Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Distributions

The increase in extrapulmonary bacteria in arsenic-exposed mice in the face of unchanged pulmonary bacterial burden suggested to us two mechanistic possibilities, that arsenic may a) impair killing of bacteria in the bloodstream after translocation from the airspace, and/or b) directly compromise the integrity (i.e., increase the permeability) of the pulmonary epithelial barrier to bacteria. Our finding of attenuated plasma cytokine induction after systemic LPS challenge, suggesting dysfunction of peripheral tissue macrophages and/or blood leukocytes, potentially supported the former possibility.

To formally test bloodstream killing of bacteria, we bypassed the lung, inoculating mice i.v. with a range of doses of K. pneumoniae, and then cultured the blood and spleen at different time points in order to profile bacterial clearance. Arsenic exposure did not alter bloodstream or splenic counts of bacteria 4 h after i.v. injection of 9.2×104 or 6.2×103 CFUs of K. pneumoniae (Figure 5a). Similarly, bloodstream bacterial burden was equivalent in arsenic-exposed and control mice 18 h after i.v. injection of 960 CFUs of K. pneumoniae (Figure 5b). Further, suggesting that arsenic does not compromise either basal or emergency granulopoiesis (i.e., release from the bone marrow of bactericidal PMNs into the bloodstream in response to bacteremia and cytokines), we found that the number of PMNs and other leukocyte subtypes in peripheral blood of mice in the steady state as well as 24 h post-i.t. K. pneumoniae was not altered in arsenic-exposed mice (Figure 5c, d).

Figures 5a and 5b plot K. pneumoniae inoculation (log CFU per milliliter) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic in the blood and spleen samples (x-axis) 4 hours and 18 hours post-i.v. K. pneumoniae, respectively. Figures 5c and 5d are bar graphs with standard error of the mean plotting peripheral leukocyte count baseline and pleukocyte count 24 hours post K. pneumoniae (times 10 superscript 3 per microliter) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic in the lymph, PMN, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil samples (x-axis).
Figure 5. Intravascular K. pneumoniae clearance following oral arsenic exposure. (a, b) Mice maintained for 5 wk on drinking water with the indicated arsenic content were injected i.v. with 9.2×104 or 6.2×103 CFUs of K. pneumoniae. Bacteria were quantified in blood and spleen 4 h later (a). Alternatively, bacteria were quantified 18 h after i.v. injection of 960 CFUs (b). n=6/treatment/condition; representative of two independent experiments. (c, d) Circulating leukocytes were counted in arsenic water–exposed mice preceding (c) or 24 h following i.t. infection with 2,000 CFU K. pneumoniae (d).
n=6/treatment; representative of two independent experiments. Data shown are mean±SEM. Note: baso, basophil; CFU, colony forming unit; eo, eosinophil; i.t., intratracheal; i.v., intravenous; lymph, lymphocyte; mono, monocyte; ND, not detected; PMN, neutrophil.

Effects of Arsenic on Airspace-to-Plasma Translocation of Bacteria and Small Molecules

The finding of intact bacterial clearance in the bloodstream suggested to us that the increased peripheral bacterial burden in arsenic-exposed mice during pneumonia might instead arise from increased permeability of the airspace to pathogens. In support of this, we found evidence for arsenic dose-dependent acceleration of K. pneumoniae dissemination from the airspace during pneumonia. Specifically, at 12 h post-i.t. K. pneumoniae, a time point at which lung bacterial burden was equivalent across arsenic conditions and no bloodstream bacteria could yet be cultured in nonarsenic-exposed mice, 1 of 6 mice at 250 ppb and 4 of 6 mice at 25 ppm arsenic exposure (p<0.05) had detectable bacteremia (Figure 6a).

Figure 6a plots K. pneumoniae inoculation (log CFU per milliliter) (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic in the lung and blood samples (x-axis). Standard errors of the mean are also plotted. Figures 6b and 6c are bar graphs with standard error of the mean plotting, respectively, BALF albumin in micrograms per milliliter and BALF IgM in micrograms per milliliter (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic in the naïve and post-LPS condition (x-axis). Figure 6d is a bar graph with standard error of the mean plotting CC16 in picograms per milliliter (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic in uninfected and K. pneumoniae-infected BALF and serum. Figure 6e plots RLU (488 nanometers) (y-axis) after exposure to 0 and 250 ppb arsenic (x-axis) in FITC-dextran. Standard errors of the mean are also plotted.
Figure 6. Effects of oral arsenic on markers of alveolocapillary barrier permeability. (a) Mice maintained for 5 wk on drinking water with the indicated arsenic content were infected i.t. with 2,000 CFU K. pneumoniae, and then sacrificed for lung and blood bacterial quantification 12 h later. n=6/treatment/tissue. (b, c) Mice under the indicated drinking water conditions as in a were left untreated, or exposed to aerosolized LPS (300 μg/mL, 30 min) and sacrificed 24 h later. BALF albumin (b) and IgM (c) were then quantified by ELISA. n=6−18/treatment. (d) Mice exposed to drinking water conditions shown were left uninfected or infected i.t. with 2,000 CFU K. pneumoniae for 24 h. BALF and serum CC16 were quantified. n=6/condition; representative of three independent experiments. (e) Mice treated with drinking water conditions shown were exposed to aerosolized LPS. 5 h post-LPS, mice received i.t. FITC-dextran and then were sacrificed 1 h later for fluorescence detection in plasma. Note: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; CFU, colony-forming unit; IgM, immunoglobulin M; i.t., intratracheal; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; RLU, relative light unit. n=17−18/condition. Data shown are mean±SEM. *p<0.05; **p<0.01.

During pneumonia, intra-alveolar bacteria must first transit the epithelial barrier and then the endothelium in order to access the bloodstream. Bacterial penetration may in principle either be paracellular, via penetration through intercellular tight junctions, or transcellular, following invasion and/or damage to cells. Measurement in BALF of the levels of two plasma proteins, albumin (MW, ∼67 kDa) and IgM (MW, ∼970 kDa in pentameric form), is commonly used as a metric of endothelial permeability in the lung to circulating medium-sized and large molecules, respectively (Herrero and Matute-Bello 2015). BALF albumin and IgM were both increased after exposure of mice to inhaled LPS, as expected; however, levels were equivalent between control and arsenic-exposed mice in both the naïve and post-LPS condition (Figure 6b, c). This finding argues against overt compromise of the pulmonary endothelial barrier by peroral arsenic exposure.

We next evaluated the permeability of the respiratory epithelium using two independent approaches. CC16 is endogenously released into the airspace by epithelial Club cells; increased bloodstream levels of CC16 have been widely used as a biomarker indicating increased permeability of the respiratory epithelium (Lakind et al. 2007). Of interest, we found that peroral arsenic induced a dose-dependent increase in serum CC16 both in uninfected mice and in mice 24 h post-i.t. K. pneumoniae (Figure 6d). In a second approach designed to measure epithelial permeability to an exogenous marker under inflammatory conditions, we instilled FITC-labeled dextran i.t. 5 h post-LPS inhalation and then measured fluorescence intensity in the plasma 1 h later (Chen et al. 2014). Increased plasma FITC signal was detected in arsenic-exposed mice (Figure 6e), suggesting that arsenic also increases the permeability of the respiratory epithelium to inhaled foreign agents.

We questioned whether arsenic increases permeability by compromising epithelial cell viability. However, no increase in uptake of the nuclear dye 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) by total pulmonary epithelial (CD31CD34CD45EpCAM+) cells was seen by flow cytometry in arsenic-exposed mice (Figure 7a). This suggests that either arsenic does not cause a lytic mode of respiratory epithelial cell death that is detectable in pooled total epithelial cells subjected to an enzymatic lung digest protocol, or that, if it does, the affected cells are homeostatically cleared in vivo.

Figure 7a comprises a software image, histogram, and a bar graph with standard errors of mean plotting percentage of 7AAD superscript positive cells (y-axis) after exposure to 0 and 250 ppb arsenic (x-axis). Figure 7b comprises two bar graphs with standard errors of mean plotting Claudin 18 mRNA and Claudin 3 (normalized) separately in lungs of mice after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic. Figure 7c comprises an immunoblot and a bar graph with standard errors of mean plotting arbitrary units of BALF T1 alpha (y-axis) after exposure to 0, 250 ppb, and 25 ppm arsenic.
Figure 7. Effects of oral arsenic on pulmonary epithelial viability and injury. (a) Epithelial cells from lungs of arsenic-exposed and control mice were evaluated for viability by 7-AAD uptake. As shown by cytometry gating at left, epithelial cells were defined as Lin-negative (i.e., CD31CD34CD45 EpCAM+). This cell population (circled in the cytometry gating plot) was then evaluated for 7-AAD uptake, as shown in the histogram at the middle of the panel. 7-AAD+ cells (rightmost peak in histogram) are quantified in the bar graph at right (n=7/condition). (b) Claudin 18 and claudin 3 mRNA (normalized to GAPDH) was quantified in lung homogenates of mice following 5 wk of exposure to drinking water with the indicated arsenic content. n=6/condition. (c) Ultracentrifuged BALF was assayed by immunoblot for T1α, a marker of alveolar epithelial type 1 cell injury. Gel image shows BALF from nine independent mice, treated across the three conditions shown. T1α signal densitometry is quantified in the bar graph at the right. Note: AAD, 7-aminoactinomycin D; AU, arbitrary unit; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Lin, lineage. Data shown are mean±SEM. *p<0.05.

The claudin family of tight junction proteins serve as key regulators of permeability in the lung (Koval 2013). Of particular importance in the terminal airspaces are claudin 18, an alveolar epithelial-specific protein that is the predominant claudin of alveolar epithelial type 1 (AT1) cells, and claudin 3, which is relatively enriched in alveolar epithelial type 2 (AT2) cells (Koval 2013; LaFemina et al. 2014). Permeability defects in a variety of lung diseases have been shown to arise from abnormal changes, upward and downward, in pulmonary claudin expression. Of interest, we found that arsenic exposure via drinking water induced a dose-dependent increase in claudin 18 mRNA in lung homogenates, whereas claudin 3 expression was unaltered (Figure 7b). This suggested that arsenic might be increasing epithelial permeability through intoxication of AT1 cells. Consistent with this, we found elevated BALF levels of podoplanin/T1α protein, an established marker of AT1 injury (LaFemina et al. 2014), in arsenic-exposed mice (Figure 7c).

Discussion

In recent years, a growing number of epidemiologic reports have linked arsenic exposure via drinking water with a wide range of respiratory symptoms, signs, and diseases (D’Ippoliti et al. 2015; Mazumder et al. 2005; Steinmaus et al. 2016). In parallel, controlled exposure studies in rodents have suggested that the lung, perhaps due to its local arsenic metabolism and highly oxidizing microenvironment, may be uniquely susceptible to toxicity from orally ingested arsenic (Yamanaka et al. 1989). Indeed, arsenic has been shown to localize to the mouse lung within 1 h of a single oral administration and shows progressive accumulation upon repeated dosing (Hughes et al. 2003; Kenyon et al. 2005). To date, very few studies have been reported that address mechanisms by which oral arsenic modifies immune/inflammatory responses in the lung in vivo. Direct exposure of cultured macrophages with in vitro arsenic, or of airway macrophages via inhaled arsenic, suppresses antimicrobial and inflammatory functions (Lantz et al. 1995). However, the susceptibility of lung cells to arsenic ingested orally—the route most relevant to global health—remains largely undefined.

Here, we provide evidence that in vivo arsenic exposure via the oral route elicits differential functional effects upon macrophages of the intrapulmonary versus extrapulmonary compartment. Thus, following LPS inhalation, alveolar macrophages from arsenic-exposed mice had intact cytokine induction associated with normal in vivo BALF concentrations of TNFα, whereas plasma TNFα following i.p. LPS, largely a product of hepatosplenic macrophages (Vollmar et al. 1996), was markedly attenuated in this setting. The latter finding is generally consistent with a prior report that i.p. challenge of mice with sodium arsenite reduces LPS-induced nitric oxide production by purified splenic macrophages (Sengupta and Bishayi 2002). Alveolar macrophages have a different ontogeny and immune phenotype than macrophages from other tissues (Guilliams et al. 2013). Future studies are thus warranted to better define whether pulmonary and extrapulmonary macrophages have different intrinsic susceptibility to arsenic. Alternatively, the microenvironments of the alveolus and peripheral tissues may expose local macrophages to different concentrations and profiles of arsenic metabolites and/or program differential susceptibility through other local factors.

Our finding that arsenic increases alveolar-to-plasma permeability of the lung to bacteria, endogenous proteins (CC16), and exogenous small molecules (FITC-dextran), and that this may arise from compromise to AT1 (and perhaps other epithelial) cells, suggests a novel mechanism by which orally ingested arsenic may interact with inhaled exposures to amplify lung injury and augment systemic penetration of airborne agents. Of interest, a few clinical studies have provided indications that oral arsenic may injure the alveolar epithelium in humans. Thus, sputum levels of receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), a protein with high expression in AT1 cells, are reduced in patients with elevated urinary inorganic arsenic and are negatively correlated with the concentration of methylarsenic metabolites in exposed humans (Olivas-Calderón et al. 2015).

CC16 (a protein of pulmonary epithelial origin that is released into the airway lumen) has a complex relationship with environmental exposures. Although elevated plasma CC16 has been interpreted as a biomarker of increased respiratory epithelial permeability after acute lung insults (Lakind et al. 2007), reduced plasma CC16 has been interpreted as a biomarker of Club cell (i.e., epithelial) toxicity, typically in the setting of chronic injurious exposures (Beamer et al. 2016). Of interest, reduced plasma and urinary CC16 have been found in humans with chronic arsenic exposure (Beamer et al. 2016; Parvez et al. 2008). We speculate that a more prolonged arsenic exposure than 5 wk (the protocol used in the present study), or perhaps in utero exposure, as is presumed to occur in human populations (Rahman et al. 2011), may have instead caused progressive Club cell injury and resultant reduction in BALF and serum CC16. Future studies are warranted to better define the kinetics and reversibility of this biomarker in experimental oral arsenic exposure. Serum CC16 could potentially serve as a useful indicator of acute versus chronic injury to the respiratory epithelium in human populations, both during exposure and environmental mitigation.

In vitro studies have begun to suggest mechanisms by which arsenic may compromise the respiratory epithelium. Arsenic treatment of primary mouse tracheal epithelial and immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells reduces transepithelial electrical resistance, a measure of barrier function, and also alters expression of claudins (Sherwood et al. 2013b), similar to the findings in the present study. Arsenic also attenuates wound-induced purinergic calcium signaling and wound repair in respiratory epithelial cells in vitro (Sherwood et al. 2011, 2013a). It has been suggested that arsenic may either alter purinergic receptor function through direct binding to protein thiols (Hughes et al. 2011), or indirectly compromise wound repair (Olsen et al. 2008) and impair tight junction barrier function (Vermeer et al. 2009) through induction and activation of epithelial matrix metallo-proteinase-9. Additional mechanisms revealed by in vitro studies by which arsenic may potentially compromise pulmonary epithelial cells include degradation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (Bomberger et al. 2012), DNA damage (Xie et al. 2014), glycolytic reprograming (Zhao et al. 2013), and pro-apoptotic effects on mitochondria (Larochette et al. 1999).

Because aquaporins promote arsenic uptake into cells (Roggenbeck et al. 2016) and are highly expressed by the alveolar epithelium (Kreda et al. 2001), it is intriguing to consider that these channel proteins may, at least in part, underlie the apparent susceptibility of respiratory epithelia to arsenic. Given that arsenic-induced cellular transformation has been associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (Li et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2012), it seems plausible that the capacity of arsenic to disorder the epithelial barrier and to induce neoplasms of epithelial origin may possibly reflect different stages on a spectrum of molecular pathogenesis in the lung.

Optimal dosing and administration of arsenic in rodent models of human disease have remained somewhat controversial (States et al. 2011). Although the environmental relevance of the high arsenic dose used in the present study (25 ppm) may be questioned, ppm-range arsenic levels have been documented in drinking water outside the United States (Das et al. 1995). Moreover, mice have much higher capacity for arsenic metabolism than humans, and 50 ppm oral arsenic in rodents has been shown to achieve arsenic concentrations in liver tissue similar to those documented in human subjects from high arsenic-exposure regions (States et al. 2011). The major findings in our study, including increased bacterial dissemination and in vivo epithelial permeability, were observed with 250 ppb arsenic. The relevance of the findings observed only at the 25 ppm dose [i.e., increased steady-state airway leukocytes (Figure 1), S. pneumoniae bacteremia (Figure 1), plasma TNFα after K. pneumoniae infection (Figure 4), and BALF T1α (Figure 7)] is uncertain, and caution is thus warranted in interpreting these results. Whether lower doses (e.g., <10 ppb, the current U.S. EPA standard [epa.gov]) would induce similar changes is an interesting question worthy of further study. Prior reports have in fact documented significant changes in gene expression and immune response in mouse lung at these very low levels (Kozul et al. 2009a, 2009b). Our studies also raise the important possibility that background arsenic in the widely used NIH-31 diet may be an underappreciated variable in rodent studies that involve the pulmonary epithelium. Because our studies were limited to female mice, future studies are warranted to determine whether arsenic has similar or distinct effects in male mice.

Conclusions

We report for the first time that orally ingested arsenic compromises the respiratory barrier to inhaled pathogens and exogenous small molecules and provide evidence that this effect may stem, at least in part, from compromise to the lung epithelium. Respiratory epithelial barrier integrity has been shown to be pivotal to the pulmonary innate and adaptive immune response (Georas and Rezaee 2014), and to play a role in regulating atopic (Schuijs et al. 2015), fibrotic (Barkauskas and Noble 2014), and reparative (Liang et al. 2016) events in the lung, as well as translocation of air pollutants into the systemic circulation (Thorley et al. 2014). Taken together, we speculate that orally ingested arsenic may possibly interact synergistically with a wide range of inhaled exposures to promote pulmonary and perhaps systemic diseases of great public health significance.

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Perrow for breeding assistance, L. Miller DeGraff for technical assistance with animal harvests, the NIEHS Vivarium staff for assistance with animal care, the NIEHS Flow Cytometry Core for assistance with cytometry, and M. Styblo of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for consultation on arsenic.

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01 ES102005).

References

Andrew AS, Bernardo V, Warnke LA, Davey JC, Hampton T, Mason RA, et al. 2007. Exposure to arsenic at levels found in U.S. drinking water modifies expression in the mouse lung. Toxicol Sci 100(1):75–87, PMID: 17682005, 10.1093/toxsci/kfm200.

Barkauskas CE, Noble PW. 2014. Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 7. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 306(11):C987–C996, PMID: 24740535, 10.1152/ajpcell.00321.2013.

Beamer PI, Klimecki WT, Loh M, Van Horne YO, Sugeng AJ, Lothrop N, et al. 2016. Association of children’s urinary CC16 levels with arsenic concentrations in multiple environmental media. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(5), pii: E521, PMID: 27223295, 10.3390/ijerph13050521.

Boellmann F, Zhang L, Clewell HJ, Schroth GP, Kenyon EM, Andersen ME, et al. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression changes in the mouse lung following subchronic arsenate exposure. Toxicol Sci 117(2):404–417, PMID: 20667999, 10.1093/toxsci/kfq225.

Bomberger JM, Coutermarsh BA, Barnaby RL, Stanton BA. 2012. Arsenic promotes ubiquitinylation and lysosomal degradation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channels in human airway epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 287(21):17130–17139, PMID: 22467879, 10.1074/jbc.M111.338855.

Celik I, Gallicchio L, Boyd K, Lam TK, Matanoski G, Tao X, et al. 2008. Arsenic in drinking water and lung cancer: a systematic review. Environ Res 108(1):48–55, PMID: 18511031, 10.1016/j.envres.2008.04.001.

Chen H, Wu S, Lu R, Zhang YG, Zheng Y, Sun J. 2014. Pulmonary permeability assessed by fluorescent-labeled dextran instilled intranasally into mice with LPS-induced acute lung injury. PloS One 9(7):e101925, PMID: 25007191, 10.1371/journal.pone.0101925.

Das D, Bindhani B, Mukherjee B, Saha H, Biswas P, Dutta K, et al. 2014. Chronic low-level arsenic exposure reduces lung function in male population without skin lesions. Int J Public Health 59(4):655–663, PMID: 24879317, 10.1007/s00038-014-0567-5.

Das D, Chatterjee A, Mandal BK, Samanta G, Chakraborti D, Chanda B. 1995. Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part 2. Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people. Analyst 120(3):917–924, PMID: 7741255, 10.1039/an9952000917.

Dauphiné DC, Ferreccio C, Guntur S, Yuan Y, Hammond SK, Balmes J, et al. 2011. Lung function in adults following in utero and childhood exposure to arsenic in drinking water: preliminary findings. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84(6):591–600, PMID: 20972800, 10.1007/s00420-010-0591-6.

D’Ippoliti D, Santelli E, De Sario M, Scortichini M, Davoli M, Michelozzi P. 2015. Arsenic in drinking water and mortality for cancer and chronic diseases in central Italy, 1990–2010. PloS One 10:e0138182, PMID: 26383851, 10.1371/journal.pone.0138182.

Draper DW, Madenspacher JH, Dixon D, King DH, Remaley AT, Fessler MB. 2010. ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 deficiency dysregulates host defense in the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182(3):404–412, PMID: 20395559, 10.1164/rccm.200910-1580OC.

Georas SN, Rezaee F. 2014. Epithelial barrier function: at the front line of asthma immunology and allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134(3):509–520, PMID: 25085341, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.049.

George CM, Brooks WA, Graziano JH, Nonyane BA, Hossain L, Goswami D, et al. 2015. Arsenic exposure is associated with pediatric pneumonia in rural Bangladesh: a case control study. Environ Health 14(1):83, PMID: 26497043, 10.1186/s12940-015-0069-9.

Guilliams M, De Kleer I, Henri S, Post S, Vanhoutte L, De Prijck S, et al. 2013. Alveolar macrophages develop from fetal monocytes that differentiate into long-lived cells in the first week of life via GM-CSF. J Exp Med 210(10):1977–1992, PMID: 24043763, 10.1084/jem.20131199.

Healy SM, Casarez EA, Ayala-Fierro F, Aposhian H. 1998. Enzymatic methylation of arsenic compounds. V. Arsenite methyltransferase activity in tissues of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 148(1):65–70, PMID: 9465265, 10.1006/taap.1997.8306.

Herrero R, Matute-Bello G. 2015. How to measure alterations in alveolar barrier function as a marker of lung injury. Curr Protoc Toxicol 63:24.3.1–24.3.15, PMID: 25645245, 10.1002/0471140856.tx2403s63.

Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS, Thomas DJ. 2011. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicol Sci 123(2):305–332, PMID: 21750349, 10.1093/toxsci/kfr184.

Hughes MF, Kenyon EM, Edwards BC, Mitchell CT, Razo LM, Thomas DJ. 2003. Accumulation and metabolism of arsenic in mice after repeated oral administration of arsenate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 191(3):202–210, PMID: 13678653, 10.1016/S0041-008X(03)00249-7.

Kenyon EM, Del Razo LM, Hughes MF. 2005. Tissue distribution and urinary excretion of inorganic arsenic and its methylated metabolites in mice following acute oral administration of arsenate. Toxicol Sci 85(1):468–475, PMID: 15703264, 10.1093/toxsci/kfi107.

Koval M. 2013. Claudin heterogeneity and control of lung tight junctions. Annu Rev Physiol 75:551–567, PMID: 23072447, 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183809.

Kozul CD, Ely KH, Enelow RI, Hamilton JW. 2009a. Low-dose arsenic compromises the immune response to influenza A infection in vivo. Environ Health Perspect 117(9):1441–1447, PMID: 19750111, 10.1289/ehp.0900911.

Kozul CD, Hampton TH, Davey JC, Gosse JA, Nomikos AP, Eisenhauer PL, et al. 2009b. Chronic exposure to arsenic in the drinking water alters the expression of immune response genes in mouse lung. Environ Health Perspect 117:1108–1115, PMID: 19654921, 10.1289/ehp.0800199.

Kreda SM, Gynn MC, Fenstermacher DA, Boucher RC, Gabriel SE. 2001. Expression and localization of epithelial aquaporins in the adult human lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 24(3):224–234, PMID: 11245621, 10.1165/ajrcmb.24.3.4367.

LaFemina MJ, Sutherland KM, Bentley T, Gonzales LW, Allen L, Chapin CJ, et al. 2014. Claudin-18 deficiency results in alveolar barrier dysfunction and impaired alveologenesis in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 51(4):550–558, PMID: 24787463, 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0456OC.

Lakind JS, Holgate ST, Ownby DR, Mansur AH, Helms PJ, Pyatt D, et al. 2007. A critical review of the use of Clara cell secretory protein (CC16) as a biomarker of acute or chronic pulmonary effects. Biomarkers 12(5):445–467, PMID: 17701745, 10.1080/13547500701359327.

Lantz RC, Parliman G, Chen GJ, Barber D, Winski S, Carter DE. 1995. Effect of arsenic exposure on alveolar macrophage function. II. Effect of slightly soluble forms of As(III) and As(V). Environ Res 68(1):59–67, PMID: 7537211, 10.1006/enrs.1995.1008.

Larochette N, Decaudin D, Jacotot E, Brenner C, Marzo I, Susin SA, et al. 1999. Arsenite induces apoptosis via a direct effect on the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Exp Cell Res 249(2):413–421, PMID: 10366441, 10.1006/excr.1999.4519.

Li G, Lee LS, Li M, Tsao SW, Chiu JF. 2011. Molecular changes during arsenic-induced cell transformation. J Cell Physiol 226(12):3225–3232, PMID: 21344382, 10.1002/jcp.22683.

Liang J, Zhang Y, Xie T, Liu N, Chen H, Geng Y, et al. 2016. Hyaluronan and TLR4 promote surfactant-protein-C-positive alveolar progenitor cell renewal and prevent severe pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Nat Med 22(11):1285–1293, PMID: 27694932, 10.1038/nm.4192.

Madenspacher JH, Fessler MB. 2016. A non-invasive and technically non-intensive method for induction and phenotyping of experimental bacterial pneumonia in mice. J Vis Exp 115:e54508, PMID: 27768086, 10.3791/54508.

Mazumder DN, Haque R, Ghosh N, De BK, Santra A, Chakraborti D, et al. 2000. Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol 29(6):1047–1052, PMID: 11101546, 10.1093/ije/29.6.1047.

Mazumder DN, Steinmaus C, Bhattacharya P, von Ehrenstein OS, Ghosh N, Gotway M, et al. 2005. Bronchiectasis in persons with skin lesions resulting from arsenic in drinking water. Epidemiology 16(6):760–765, PMID: 16222165, 10.1097/01.ede.0000181637.10978.e6.

Olivas-Calderón E, Recio-Vega R, Gandolfi AJ, Lantz RC, González-Cortes T, Gonzalez-De Alba C, et al. 2015. Lung inflammation biomarkers and lung function in children chronically exposed to arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 287(2):161–167, PMID: 26048584, 10.1016/j.taap.2015.06.001.

Olsen CE, Liguori AE, Zong Y, Lantz RC, Burgess JL, Boitano S. 2008. Arsenic upregulates MMP-9 and inhibits wound repair in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 295(2):L293–L302, PMID: 18539681, 10.1152/ajplung.00134.2007.

Parvez F, Chen Y, Brandt-Rauf PW, Bernard A, Dumont X, Slavkovich V, et al. 2008. Nonmalignant respiratory effects of chronic arsenic exposure from drinking water among never-smokers in Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect 116(2):190–195, PMID: 18288317, 10.1289/ehp.9507.

Parvez F, Chen Y, Brandt-Rauf PW, Slavkovich V, Islam T, Ahmed A, et al. 2010. A prospective study of respiratory symptoms associated with chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh: findings from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS). Thorax 65(6):528–533, PMID: 20522851, 10.1136/thx.2009.119347.

Parvez F, Chen Y, Yunus M, Olopade C, Segers S, Slavkovich V, et al. 2013. Arsenic exposure and impaired lung function. Findings from a large population-based prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188(7):813–819, PMID: 23848239, 10.1164/rccm.201212-2282OC.

Rahman A, Vahter M, Ekström EC, Persson LA. 2011. Arsenic exposure in pregnancy increases the risk of lower respiratory tract infection and diarrhea during infancy in Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect 119(5):719–724, PMID: 21147604, 10.1289/ehp.1002265.

Ramsey KA, Foong RE, Sly PD, Larcombe AN, Zosky GR. 2013. Early life arsenic exposure and acute and long-term responses to influenza A infection in mice. Environ Health Perspect 121(10):1187–1193, PMID: 23968752, 10.1289/ehp.1306748.

Recio-Vega R, Gonzalez-Cortes T, Olivas-Calderon E, Lantz RC, Gandolfi AJ, Gonzalez-De Alba C. 2015. In utero and early childhood exposure to arsenic decreases lung function in children. J Appl Toxicol 35(4):358–366, PMID: 25131850, 10.1002/jat.3023.

Roggenbeck BA, Banerjee M, Leslie EM. 2016. Cellular arsenic transport pathways in mammals. J Environ Sci (China) 49:38–58, PMID: 28007179, 10.1016/j.jes.2016.10.001.

Rosadini CV, Kagan JC. 2017. Early innate immune responses to bacterial LPS. Curr Opin Immunol 44:14–19, PMID: 27842237, 10.1016/j.coi.2016.10.005.

Schuijs MJ, Willart MA, Vergote K, Gras D, Deswarte K, Ege MJ, et al. 2015. Farm dust and endotoxin protect against allergy through A20 induction in lung epithelial cells. Science 349(6252):1106–1110, PMID: 26339029, 10.1126/science.aac6623.

Sengupta M, Bishayi B. 2002. Effect of lead and arsenic on murine macrophage response. Drug Chem Toxicol 25(4):459–472, PMID: 12378952, 10.1081/DCT-120014796.

Sherwood CL, Lantz RC, Boitano S. 2013a. Chronic arsenic exposure in nanomolar concentrations compromises wound response and intercellular signaling in airway epithelial cells. Toxicol Sci 132(1):222–234, PMID: 23204110, 10.1093/toxsci/kfs331.

Sherwood CL, Lantz RC, Burgess JL, Boitano S. 2011. Arsenic alters ATP-dependent Ca2+ signaling in human airway epithelial cell wound response. Toxicol Sci 121(1):191–206, PMID: 21357385, 10.1093/toxsci/kfr044.

Sherwood CL, Liguori AE, Olsen CE, Lantz RC, Burgess JL, Boitano S. 2013b. Arsenic compromises conducting airway epithelial barrier properties in primary mouse and immortalized human cell cultures. PloS One 8:e82970, PMID: 24349408, 10.1371/journal.pone.0082970.

Smith AH, Ercumen A, Yuan Y, Steinmaus CM. 2009. Increased lung cancer risks are similar whether arsenic is ingested or inhaled. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19(4):343–348, PMID: 19190673, 10.1038/jes.2008.73.

Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y, Ferreccio C, Liaw J, von Ehrenstein O, et al. 2006. Increased mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis in young adults after exposure to arsenic in utero and in early childhood. Environ Health Perspect 114(8):1293–1296, PMID: 16882542, 10.1289/ehp.8832.

Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y, Liaw J, Ferreccio C, Steinmaus C. 2011. Evidence from Chile that arsenic in drinking water may increase mortality from pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Epidemiol 173(4):414–420, PMID: 21190988, 10.1093/aje/kwq383.

Smoak K, Madenspacher J, Jeyaseelan S, Williams B, Dixon D, Poch KR, et al. 2008. Effects of liver X receptor agonist treatment on pulmonary inflammation and host defense. J Immunol 180(5):3305–3312, PMID: 18292555, 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3305.

States JC, Barchowsky A, Cartwright IL, Reichard JF, Futscher BW, Lantz RC. 2011. Arsenic toxicology: translating between experimental models and human pathology. Environ Health Perspect 119(10):1356–1363, PMID: 21684831, 10.1289/ehp.1103441.

Steinmaus C, Ferreccio C, Acevedo J, Balmes JR, Liaw J, Troncoso P, et al. 2016. High risks of lung disease associated with early-life and moderate lifetime arsenic exposure in northern Chile. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 313:10–15, PMID: 27725189, 10.1016/j.taap.2016.10.006.

Thorley AJ, Ruenraroengsak P, Potter TE, Tetley TD. 2014. Critical determinants of uptake and translocation of nanoparticles by the human pulmonary alveolar epithelium. ACS Nano 8:11778–11789, PMID: 25360809, 10.1021/nn505399e.

Vermeer PD, Denker J, Estin M, Moninger TO, Keshavjee S, Karp P, et al. 2009. MMP9 modulates tight junction integrity and cell viability in human airway epithelia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 296(5):L751–L762, PMID: 19270179, 10.1152/ajplung.90578.2008.

Vollmar B, Rüttinger D, Wanner GA, Leiderer R, Menger MD. 1996. Modulation of Kupffer cell activity by gadolinium chloride in endotoxemic rats. Shock 6(6):434–441, PMID: 8961394.

von Ehrenstein OS, Mazumder DN, Yuan Y, Samanta S, Balmes J, Sil A, et al. 2005. Decrements in lung function related to arsenic in drinking water in West Bengal, India. Am J Epidemiol 162(6):533–541, PMID: 16093295, 10.1093/aje/kwi236.

Xie H, Huang S, Martin S, Wise JP Sr. 2014. Arsenic is cytotoxic and genotoxic to primary human lung cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 760:33–41, PMID: 24291234, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.11.001.

Xu Y, Li Y, Pang Y, Ling M, Shen L, Yang X, et al. 2012. EMT and stem cell-like properties associated with HIF-2α are involved in arsenite-induced transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells. PloS One 7(5):e37765, PMID: 22662215, 10.1371/journal.pone.0037765.

Yamanaka K, Hasegawa A, Sawamura R, Okada S. 1989. Dimethylated arsenics induce DNA strand breaks in lung via the production of active oxygen in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165(1):43–50, PMID: 2590239.

Zemans RL, Colgan SP, Downey GP. 2009. Transepithelial migration of neutrophils: mechanisms and implications for acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40(5):519–535, PMID: 18978300, 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0348TR.

Zhao F, Severson P, Pacheco S, Futscher BW, Klimecki WT. 2013. Arsenic exposure induces the Warburg effect in cultured human cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 271(1):72–77, PMID: 23648393, 10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.020.


WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien